Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Did Hillary Clinton have anything to do with Stein's Fund for Recount? Multiple Choice Poll
Sure. "and" She secretly donated to the fund 54 31.40%
Sure she did. Still being Crooked-Hillary 81 47.09%
No Way! 24 13.95%
The Russians had something to do with it. 2 1.16%
The election was hacked for sure, right? 4 2.33%
The Donaters to Stein's fund are about to get ripped off $$$$ Burned! 39 22.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 172. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-23-2016, 10:44 AM
 
27,131 posts, read 15,308,615 times
Reputation: 12068

Advertisements

They have not found any evidence to recount.

 
Old 11-23-2016, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,711,350 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalk View Post
Haha still no proof at all, you really need to have one integrity and stop lying as you speak like your candidate trump!

Like I pointed out all the sources, people who GOT ARRESTED for election fraud are trumpkins
and it only happened with Trump supporters? It is you who needs to have proof. Has it occurred to you maybe these people who supposedly were arrested may have claimed they were Trumpsters or Trumpkins as you put it and think you are so funny> You really need to get a gripe: I will say the same thing to you I said a minute ago: Suck it up Butter Cup. What about all the protesters that have been arrested, is that different and acceptable?
 
Old 11-23-2016, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
4,510 posts, read 4,042,401 times
Reputation: 3084
instead of recounting how about just make it so it can't be frauded in the future.
 
Old 11-23-2016, 11:33 AM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,268,999 times
Reputation: 5253
why would CNN give false hope to a group of democrats who suffered enough on election night? this is wrong!

I never seen a bunch of lesbians, gays, nerds, feminists and democrats in one place cry in my life at the Clinton's headquarter in New York City on election night.....its bad enough they had to return the fire works for a refund and all the stuff they had to return from the party but giving false hope is brutal.......but I love it!
 
Old 11-23-2016, 12:30 PM
 
33,321 posts, read 12,511,334 times
Reputation: 14937
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
Just announced on air on CNN......the 'Clinton Camp' (presumably Podesta, etc.) have agreed to meet with these computer scientists.
 
Old 11-23-2016, 12:55 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,611,558 times
Reputation: 18521
The computer is going to have the same numbers, or it should or their is some tampering.
The computer is not going to count differently.

Now, an audit of the vote... Now that is much different than a recount. You can only really recount paper media. The computer automatically counts and would not recount differently, but the error factor in paper ballots goes way up.
 
Old 11-23-2016, 01:10 PM
 
776 posts, read 745,728 times
Reputation: 349
Let's also recount Nevada, Minnesota, Maine and New Hampshire.
 
Old 11-23-2016, 01:12 PM
 
776 posts, read 745,728 times
Reputation: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
The computer is going to have the same numbers, or it should or their is some tampering.
The computer is not going to count differently.

Now, an audit of the vote... Now that is much different than a recount. You can only really recount paper media. The computer automatically counts and would not recount differently, but the error factor in paper ballots goes way up.
You would look at machine logs.
 
Old 11-23-2016, 01:12 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,615,791 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Now, an audit of the vote... Now that is much different than a recount. You can only really recount paper media. The computer automatically counts and would not recount differently, but the error factor in paper ballots goes way up.
Don't know if it is the same there, but the computer balloting machines here in NC print a paper tape with all your choices as well. You can see it in a window by the screen and verify that your choices were printed.
 
Old 11-23-2016, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
1,436 posts, read 1,882,201 times
Reputation: 1631
I think there are reasons to warrant checking this out.
One of my friends had castes their ballot for Hilary Clinton through the electronic voting. When she went to hit Vote, the board lit up on the Trump side.

Could have been a mistake, but seemed to unreasonable to me.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top