Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think fake may be the wrong word but inaccurate or unreliable may be more appropriate. Time and again, the polls are getting it wrong and too many times, even outside the error of margin. That equates to a statistical modeling failure.
They are intentionally done. I have seen MSNBC predicting about Kansas turning blue. That is as fake as it gets.
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,798,920 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitey
Wow, it didn't even take one minute:
LOL, this "victory" was supposed to be the proof in the pudding that even Republican voters are turning against Trump. Sure enough when that didn't pan out, y'all trot out the well-worn backpedal you used after all the other special election results came in.
Sorry, nobody's buying it. When the Democrats have to focus on 450 Congressional races instead of one and they can't outspend the opposition 2 or 3 or 4 to 1, these seats will be safe again.
The person who is likely to buy it is the GOP Congressman who barely won election.
Last edited by Ibginnie; 06-20-2017 at 08:40 PM..
Reason: off topic
There is roughly 80% that will vote for the two main parties no matter who runs. There is now a growing number of people who want an alternative to the (R)'s.
I'm not sure it's as important in this race as this seems to be a pretty conservative area BUT the (D)'s are going to have to run people who are not (R)'s with a couple social differences or they will continue to lose.
I don't think (D)'s are alternative to growing number of people who want an alternate to the (R)'s.
So, the Dems torched only a mere $25 million in this election.
The good news is that most of it came from CA and NY, although why the donors want to burn their money in a losing effort in the first place is somewhat of a mystery.
It's should come as a relief to Ossoff that he lost by a fair margin. It would have been a real downer if the single vote that would have tied the election was the one he himself could not cast because he didn't live in the the district he was running to represent.
And, on the plus side, it appears that whenever a GOP-leaning Congressional district needs a quick infusion of cash, all they have to do is call a special Congressional election, and the moolah from the coasts will shower down like raindrops during the monsoon season.
That aligns with what I am saying. She is a huge part of the old failed party.
Yet they won't dump her and even after the shellacking they took during Obama's term.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Unfortunately to them, we are on to em.
