Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-26-2017, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Home is Where You Park It
23,856 posts, read 13,743,685 times
Reputation: 15482

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
Lots of excuses. A 12 hour plus period to vote plus absente voting is more than enough.


Making it easy to vote is not the goal. Having an informed electorate is, which means having people who care enough to learn about the issues and candidates actually doing the voting. I would prefer a basic efficiency test to vote, something simple like "name all the branches of government" "name two of the 9 members of the supreme court" and "how many US senators are there" This plus removing all indication of party from the ballot would do us good.
Courts have ruled that candidates have a free-speech right to identify their party affiliation.

Here in Washington, we have an election system that de-emphasizes the role of parties. But candidates are given the option to have their party preference printed on the ballot, and they overwhelmingly do so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2017, 08:45 AM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wambatown81 View Post
Voting shouldn't be hard, but it should require a little effort in getting off your butt. A slight bit of sacrifice standing in a line shows you care. And if you don't hardly care then why should your opinion of our government matter at all? I support a window of a couple days of voting because bad luck can happen (car trouble etc) but no more.
Someone might care a lot but not be able to afford to take a day off to stand in line.

Many states don't have laws requiring time off to vote. Of those that do have such laws, many do not require that it be paid. And of those that do require paid time off, many limit it to a couple hours, which is not enough if you're unfortunate enough to live in a minority neighborhood that doesn't get anywhere close to enough voting machines.

Restricting voting times is little more than a thinly veiled way to implement a poll tax and suppress the vote from people who cannot afford to not get paid for a day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top