Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's no point in arguing with these people. They are either trolls or delusional since the polls seemlingly got it wrong in 2016. So they expect a repeat. They don't account for the corrections that were made in polling since then or the statistics accounting for the "silent Trump" supporters.
However, once Trump loses the popular vote, which he will, don't expect these people to admit they were wrong. They will pivot to how the election was stolen with fraudulent votes.
Yeah, most Trump supporters on here live in their own world and its hard to tell if their serious or trolling.10 years from now, they'll be passing stories down to their grandchildren about how "the deepstate stole the election for Trump by fradulent mail in ballots."
Its always gonna be someone elses fault when objectively speaking....Trump is just a plain awful president and has never been popular other than with his base
Yeah, most Trump supporters on here live in their own world and its hard to tell if their serious or trolling.10 years from now, they'll be passing stories down to their grandchildren about how "the deepstate stole the election for Trump by fradulent mail in ballots."
Its always gonna be someone elses fault when objectively speaking....Trump is just a plain awful president and has never been popular other than with his base
Democrats can openly admit Carter was not a good President. He is consistently ranked in the bottom half of US Presidents. You lick your wounds and move on. I have my feeling that you are right. Trump supporters will be spinning tall tales about Trump and how he was taken down by TikTok and other conspirators.
No collusion with Russia
No collusion with Russia
No collusion with Russia
Repeat as much as necessary until it sinks in.
You mean when they narrowed the scope to not include looking at any of his financials, did not make some key players available, and stonewalled- they couldn't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt there was collusion. Although 1 R did vote to convict. And a second said he would learn his lesson which is an interesting comment given that most people don't use that in relation to innocence.
At any rate- SDNY should have a lot of fun once he's out of office.
I have a close relative with late stage Alzheimer's and have seen it progress from the early stages. I'm well aware of what dementia looks like. I've had other family friends' parents that had other forms of dementia.
You appear desperate to explain away why Biden handled Trump without admitting that you bought the dementia BS hook, line and sinker.
I've seen Biden speak. He's lost what little he had. You're in denial.
Biden didn't handle Trump. He repeated a few talking points and mostly had nothing else to say.
That so many Democrats have been behind someone disabled for president is a really bad sign on the Democrats.
What are your predictions for the Presidential Election 2020 popular vote?
Here are mine--
Donald Trump:
2016 popular vote: 62,984,828
2020 predicted popular vote: 64,550,000
Joe Biden:
2016 Hillary Clinton popular vote: 65,853,514
2020 predicted Joe Biden popular vote: 62,700,000
I think Trump's voter enthusiasm is through the roof, partially due to the Democrat's ANTIFA and BLM destructive riots, and the abolish/defund police proposals.
I think a lot of would-be Democrat voters are turned off this election, and won't vote, in part due to bad candidate in Biden, his worse VP candidate in Harris, and just frustration due to everything going on.
Chime in with predictions and opinion.
A parade of nonsense here, defying all current prognostications. No facts whatsoever.
Trump enthusiasm may be high, but it can't even ever measure up to the disgust and revulsion that people have for Trump. Early voting is what is through the roof, and that is a sign Democrats are out to win.
HAHA what? Biden played "despacito" on his phone at a Latino event. He pre-signaled that he'd be picking a "woman" for his VP way back before he won the nomination. He "doesn't pander??"
He's also just been pretty much proven to have lied about his knowledge of his son's corrupt behavior, using his VP status as a way to make money for him.
Biden himself said he'd be the "most progressive candidate in history." That doesn't sound like a moderate. He might have been in 1987, certainly not now.
And Kamala Harris was so hated by even the Democrat party that she had to drop out before the first primary.
1. I wouldn't call appointing a woman as his VP "pandering". Had he picked Bernie as his VP, people would have said he was pandering to progressives. Had he picked Buttigieg, people would have said he was pandering to LGBT folks. Had he picked a straight, white man for his VP, the same people would have criticized him for that, so he went with someone he thought was more than qualified, Kamala, who happens to be black and a woman.
2. This focus on Hunter Biden is nothing but a last ditch effort of the failing Trump re-election campaign to basically pull a 2016-esque surprise at the eleventh hour. The timing of this is extremely suspicious and the New York Post's reporting of all this reeks of misinformation (getting pulled from social media sites). At this point Trump is drowning in controversy and scandal (taxes, COVID, inciting white supremacists, disrespecting our veterans, etc.) so I wouldn't put it past him to start slinging mud at the competition.
3. "Progressive" doesn't equate to socialist or far-left. Reducing income inequality, reforming our policing, getting money out of politics, and introducing renewable energy policies are not and should not be considered far-left policies.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.