Elections have consequences. Stolen elections have catastrophic consequences (claim, vote)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It would be nice if you or the other clown who is challenging it viewed the presentation ....
you're asking us to waste our time on something you are unable to summarize and you yourself admit can't be verified because of ayyadura's omission of any names and addresses.
and in the very next sentence you confirm that it's true.
there is nothing legally prohibiting him from putting forward information if he has evidence a crime has been committed.
People are innocent until proven guilty, he could not give the name and address of the voter since the voter was not yet charged with a crime. It is not Dr. Shiva's job to publicly identify them. This was one example, there were multiple voters who did this. Again, if you viewed the video you would have known that.
correct..... in a court of law. there is nothing preventing ayyadura from producing the names/addresses if there truly were duplicates. if i see tommy shoplifting at 7-11 a can say "i saw tommy shoplifting at 7-11" i don't have to wait till he's charged and/or convicted.
now, if i make that same claim and i know it isn't true then i open myself up to a defamation suit from tommy ( which may be the reason ayyadura isn't getting specific ).
Quote:
It is not Dr. Shiva's job to publicly identify them.
it is precisely his job to support his claims with evidence.
correct..... in a court of law. there is nothing preventing ayyadura from producing the names/addresses if there truly were duplicates. if i see tommy shoplifting at 7-11 a can say "i saw tommy shoplifting at 7-11" i don't have to wait till he's charged and/or convicted.
now, if i make that same claim and i know it isn't true then i open myself up to a defamation suit from tommy ( which may be the reason ayyadura isn't getting specific ).
it is precisely his job to support his claims with evidence.
The evidence found from Dr. Shiva and his team will be provided in the court cases against individuals who voted twice or more in 2020. It obviously takes a long time to get through the court system, below is a link from heritage foundation on AZ election fraud cases - the latest one from 2020 was a case involving duplicate voting in the 2016 election.
The evidence found from Dr. Shiva and his team will be provided in the court cases against individuals who voted twice or more in 2020. It obviously takes a long time to get through the court system, ......
voting twice is a criminal offense. if anybody had been charged with voting twice we'd already be aware of it once they were charged ( again, that's public record ).
...the latest one from 2020 was a case involving duplicate voting in the 2016 election.
it's the only one that was from 2020 and in that case the culprit voted once in AZ and again in NV. it had nothing to do with what's going on in maricopa county. you have a list of unrelated incidents that were caught and charged. the list points to the system working.
voting twice is a criminal offense. if anybody had been charged with voting twice we'd already be aware of it once they were charged ( again, that's public record ).
The point is convicted of voter fraud.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.