Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
2004 vote: Early Likely
Bush……………40%…………..40%
Kerry…………..45……………..40
This shows two significant problems. First, Bush beat Kerry by three points, which makes this a little less valuable as a predictive tool. Second, how did CBS determine “likely voters”? In their methodology, they show only 9% of their sample as new voters, but the combined total of Bush and Kerry voters only comes to 80%. Where did the other 11% go? Into the ether? And why would Bush voters be less likely to vote in 2008 than in 2004 (the missing 3%)?
It’s not the only problem in this poll. As it does in most polls, CBS far oversampled Democrats. The party-identification split on Democrats to Republicans has a 13-point gap, 41% to 28% respectively, among likely voters. With most people predicting a gap closer to 3-5%, CBS gives Democrats at least an extra 8% in the sample — which accounts for most of Obama’s lead, apart from the other problems in this survey.
I am voting for Mr. Obama and I sincerely hope the rest of you will as well.
Sorry, I refuse to lose my manhood and turn my back on the country I have proudly served for 22 years and vote for a man who voted to cut our funding in the middle of a war.
Sorry, I refuse to lose my manhood and turn my back on the country I have proudly served for 22 years and vote for a man who voted to cut our funding in the middle of a war.
Amen!!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.