Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-07-2009, 04:33 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
And now they're being FORCED to raise $74B in 60 days. Good. Too bad they couldnt be bothered to do it on their own.
Thats my point, now they are being FORCED to do their job, something they should have done months ago, but hey, why do that when daddy government is there with a check, and wont even take the money back when its offered..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-07-2009, 04:36 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
oh you want a response? the government gave them the money so they could take over. they could have just done what most americans wanted, and ignored them and let the market phase out the losers.
But it wasnt a popular idea then, let the banks fail? Ooh no, that would mean people would lose money, lets have the government come in, make people lose money, and then say that banks need to raise money on their own... its the popular thing to do now...

I have no doubt that if the taxpayers still thought that the banks needed another bailout, they would receive their bailout.. no doubt at all, and to me, spitting in the wind to see what way the polls show people feel about the issues prior to making a decision is not leadership..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Idaho Falls
5,041 posts, read 6,221,567 times
Reputation: 1483
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefinalsay View Post
oh you want a response? the government gave them the money so they could take over. they could have just done what most americans wanted, and ignored them and let the market phase out the losers.
Yes, they could have. And a debate on whether keeping them in business was a good idea or a bad one would be useful.

However, your comment was that the Dems were actively taking over the businesses, when in fact, the businesses had begged for the intervention.

Your lies are not that easy to hide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 04:53 PM
 
Location: I currently exist only in a state of mind. one too complex for geographic location.
4,196 posts, read 5,848,016 times
Reputation: 670
no, the statement is that democrats hate the private sector. this is not a lie, it's common knowledge. why do you think corporate taxes are so high? corporate taxes should be 0%.. dems love taking over every aspect of the private sector. thefinalsay lays down the truth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by idahogie View Post
Yes, they could have. And a debate on whether keeping them in business was a good idea or a bad one would be useful.

However, your comment was that the Dems were actively taking over the businesses, when in fact, the businesses had begged for the intervention.

Your lies are not that easy to hide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 05:09 PM
 
2,265 posts, read 3,735,437 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
When they (banks and corporations) make a profit they already are stealing from the people. Profit indicates a market failure created by charging their customers too much for their product or paying their workers and suppliers too little.
That statement is so pathetic I'm not sure it even warrants a response.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:12 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by paullySC View Post
That statement is so pathetic I'm not sure it even warrants a response.
The sad part, he actually believes that...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:35 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,186,811 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Thats my point, now they are being FORCED to do their job, something they should have done months ago, but hey, why do that when daddy government is there with a check, and wont even take the money back when its offered..
Dont blame the daddy for stepping in though, blame the chronically irresponsible kid.

Obama's kind of the stepdaddy here in this story actually...get that kid on track and maybe that'll please this crazy woman he married...hold our head up among the neighbors...etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:37 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,174,590 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
Dont blame the daddy for stepping in, blame the chronically irresponsible kid.
You blame daddy for not teaching them to be responsible BY bailing them out..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 06:55 PM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,186,811 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You blame daddy for not teaching them to be responsible BY bailing them out..
Daddies will bail kids out in a crisis, but then they set up mean strict rules the kids dont like and make them straighten up - no take-backs. Anyway it's their earlier daddy's fault for indulging them to be the little piggies they are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2009, 07:53 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,928,226 times
Reputation: 4459
what you have to wonder is why the government will invest over 6 billion (plus) taxpayer dollars in a company valued at 2 billion dollars. maybe the new daddy shouldn't handle the money either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top