Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Of course art is subjective. That is the only absolute that applies to art. Some people think Thomas Kinkade is amazingly gifted and creates beautiful art. I think it's drivel. Is it my place to declare his paintings are not art? Nope.
You just declared his art to be drivel - which is your right and (gasp) quite your place to do so. Actually I think his art is drivel too.
We're splitting hairs. It's certainly my right to say that art is subjective, and also that I think the "fashions" displayed in this video are ridiculous and I can't stand them, etc - and by the way, I hope that people in centuries to come don't think that Thomas Kincade was everyone's favorite artist of this era either. But I'm not going to get too worked up about it either way.
Well, how many randomly chosen collections WOULD be? One-tenth of 1%?....one_thousandth of 1%? The odds are against any collection being around in 50 years....OP just found something weird to post with no fashion sense used in its selection. Only intended for entertainment purposes.
I get it. I'm just giving commentary - for entertainment purposes only.
Sheeze by some of the sanctimonious, pearl clutching comments on this thread, you'd think I've insulted the Queen or something!
You just declared his art to be drivel - which is your right and (gasp) quite your place to do so. Actually I think his art is drivel too.
Well yeah, I said I think it's drivel, but I didn't say that it's not art. There's plenty of art that I don't like, but that doesn't mean it's not art. It's not my place to decide whether something is art or not. Just whether or not I like it.
Well yeah, I said I think it's drivel, but I didn't say that it's not art. There's plenty of art that I don't like, but that doesn't mean it's not art. It's not my place to decide whether something is art or not. Just whether or not I like it.
For the record, I didn't say these fashions "aren't art" either. I just basically said I think they suck. Oh, to be clear, I think they're drivel.
With all the layers and shields, it looks like clothing designed to keep the Cooties at bay.
I was thinking maybe it's a statement about "me too", and the idea of what we wear is what gets us molested and raped. So, if we cover ourselves as ugly and ridiculous as possible, that should keep us safe. ( Done in a tongue-in-cheek, sardonic way.)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
:
Oh, to be clear, I think they're drivel.
