Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seattle just had a proposal for a gondola line from the center of downtown to the waterfront of Seattle. It's supposed to cut down on street level congestion and make it easier for people to access the waterfront. 2 years ago an expansive gondola project was proposed from Capitol Hill in Seattle to South lake union to the Seattle center ending at the waterfront. Gondolas have been used as an important form of public transportation in many other cities in the world but I have yet to see them used as more then a tourist attraction here in America. Do you think it can work? Could more US cities see these projects happening?
Someone recently proposed one from the Phildelphia Zoo to the Art Museum - not sure it would be financially feasable but an interesting concept as this would afford a tremedous of the city skyline bothouse row and the Art Museum accross the river - this in concept would link with an expanded light rail line that would be submerged at the Art Museum using an old Pennsylvania railroad tunnle tha exists and unused from NW Philly into Center City
But the Gondola would be more a tourist ride than anything and get people to the Zoo easier with great views
While most see gondolas as a tourist devise mostly, I think they function very similarly to cable cars of yesteryear, except that gondolas are superior since they're not slowed down by traffic lights. For a city like Seattle, an extensive gondola network would probably rival buses in terms of effectiveness of travel.
Stillwater, MN has a tourist oriented gondola on the St. Croix River (which is along part of the border of MN & WI). It has a limited season there due to the chilly winters: open from May to October. Here is a link: Gondola Romantica | Stillwater | St. Croix.
Last edited by chessgeek; 03-04-2014 at 07:54 PM..
Reason: sentence correction
Portland has the gondola. I can remember some of the residents being less than pleased about it that one of them left a rude message on his roof. I don't know if it's still there or not.
Portland's gondola pretty affordable... I don't think Seattle's going to be as affordable.
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,225,683 times
Reputation: 57822
The timing is right for Seattle, with the rapidly increasing mess of the tunnel project and seawall replacement. Unfortunately this would involve a lot of time and expense to secure street use permits from the city. They charge a lot of money (annual fees) to have anything over any street or other public property.
For example, $30,000 a year for a skybridge across a street, $3,000 for an awning that hangs over a sidewalk. This would have to be done with private money, the city would only allow it if it cost them nothing but brought in revenue.
You can ride gondolas in Central Park through the Boathouse, it's a restaurant (a very good, but expensive one). Apparently, someone drives it for you and for $30 you and up to 6 people can cruise the lake. Of course, this is a tourist attraction but still pretty interesting.
I'm not sure gondolas would be quick or overall efficient enough for public transportation, unless you made them huge and motorized which would stray from traditional. They really can only work in cities with canals, which is why they're good in Venice. Crossing the Hudson or even the East River with a gondola would not be a good idea.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.