Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is higher profile area-Gulf Coast or Great Lake?
Gulf Coast 49 43.75%
Great Lake 63 56.25%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-14-2019, 11:37 PM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,212 posts, read 3,299,341 times
Reputation: 4133

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by QCongress83216 View Post
Is it me or is this becoming a p*****g contest? "Gulf Coast good", "Great Lakes bad". "Gulf Coast is Paradise", "Great Lakes are 3rd World countries." But, us Great Lake folks are used to it by now. We're used to having all kinds of shade thrown at us while the Gulf Coast barely has any shade thrown at them. JK .
Great Lakes cities have been at or near the top of the American food chain-Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland. When you're at the top, you get haters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2019, 02:55 AM
 
2,339 posts, read 2,933,405 times
Reputation: 2349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enean View Post
Obviously, you take great delight in the term "Rust Belt", even though it's derogatory and outdated. Milwaukee is a beautiful city, and no matter how it placed, it doesn't look "Rust Belt."
Milwaukee most certainly seems very rust-belt to me. Just have a look at the Courteen Seed building, that's about as industrial and gritty as it gets.

Not that there is anything wrong with being rust-belt. Personally, I greatly admire the gritty, industrial vibe of the rust-belt. To me, the rust-belt is the most attractive, beautiful region in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 03:01 AM
 
Location: The Heart of Dixie
10,219 posts, read 15,931,403 times
Reputation: 7205
Quote:
Originally Posted by grega94 View Post
True, but it is still a navigable river that serves a different drainage basin, all the agricultural products and whatever else that is produced in Alabama are shipped down the Alabama/Mobile river, not the Mississippi river. Obliviously New Orleans will always be the larger city since it serves a much larger market, but to say Mobile doesn't have one is disingenuous.




City (population) - City (Population): Ratio | distance in between
Buffalo (1,134,210) - Rochester (1,082,284): 0.95 | 66.62 miles
Seattle (3,939,363) - Portland (2,478,810): 0.63 | 145.17 miles
Washington (6,216,589) - Baltimore (2,802,789): 0.45 | 35.15 miles
Boston (4,628,910) - Providence (1,604,291): 0.35 | 41.15 miles
New Orleans (1,262,888) - Mobile (413,757): 0.33 | 131.34 miles
New York (19,979,477) - Philadelphia (6,096,120): 0.31 80.59 miles
Houston (6,997,384) - New Orleans (1,262,888): 0.18 | 317.53 miles
Chicago (9,533,040) - Milwaukee (1,572,245): 0.16 | 81.24 miles


So I guess you are right Milwaukee is not the best example, but there are plenty of other cities that beat New Orleans and Mobile, I guess the real surprising thing is how small New Orleans is, and true it doesn't have the best geographic lay out, but certainly another near by city could have sprouted as the hub for between international trade and domestic trade of the Mississippi river drainage basin, perhaps that city could've even been Mobile, or Biloxi?

And the fact that the Gulf state doesn't have enough "economic" room to support multiple major cities tells you that the Great Lakes region is superior to the Gulf coast, with out the tourist/retirement industry of Florida and energy field of Texas, Houston and Tampa wouldn't even be as nearly large as they are now.
Baton Rouge is also relatively close to New Orleans, much closer than Mobile or Biloxi are, and is also one of the top 10 ports in the nation and a very important center for the oil and gas industry. In fact the Mississippi in between New Orleans and Baton Rouge is lined with refineries and petrochemical plants and port facilities. Lake Charles is also an important center for the energy industry including the new LNG terminal that's currently under construction, one of the largest in the world. There's also Tampa and Houston which are booming. You never see this kind of boom in the Great Lakes, an area people have fled in droves partly due to the economic conditions and partly due to the miserable weather. I just think the Great Lakes area, with their lake effect snow, for example, is just very miserable to live in most of the year. I prefer a hot humid Louisiana summer over a Chicago winter anyday, not to mention a Buffalo winter. Now in Ohio, Columbus and Cincinnati do still have decent economies and a good quality of life (and isn't as cold as Cleveland) but those are away from the Great Lakes, and Cleveland and Toledo are definitely miserable in comparison. In Indiana, Gary would be part of the Great Lakes area while Indianapolis not really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Brew City
4,865 posts, read 4,181,366 times
Reputation: 6826
Quote:
Originally Posted by drro View Post
Milwaukee most certainly seems very rust-belt to me. Just have a look at the Courteen Seed building, that's about as industrial and gritty as it gets.

Not that there is anything wrong with being rust-belt. Personally, I greatly admire the gritty, industrial vibe of the rust-belt. To me, the rust-belt is the most attractive, beautiful region in the US.
I won't argue Milwaukee's Rust Belt status (it is) but it's odd that you would choose a seed storage building as proof of Rustiness. Normally Rust Belt is defined by the decline in manufacturing.

And from the article you posted;

"The building's original owner went out of business in the 1960s. Not much seems to have been done with the property since then, but a lack of boards and broken windows indicates some form of use and occupancy."


Again, not very rusty.

There are plenty of buildings that would fit the profile though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 07:02 AM
 
4,087 posts, read 3,245,620 times
Reputation: 3058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Lennox 70 View Post
Baton Rouge is also relatively close to New Orleans, much closer than Mobile or Biloxi are, and is also one of the top 10 ports in the nation and a very important center for the oil and gas industry. In fact the Mississippi in between New Orleans and Baton Rouge is lined with refineries and petrochemical plants and port facilities. Lake Charles is also an important center for the energy industry including the new LNG terminal that's currently under construction, one of the largest in the world. There's also Tampa and Houston which are booming. You never see this kind of boom in the Great Lakes, an area people have fled in droves partly due to the economic conditions and partly due to the miserable weather. I just think the Great Lakes area, with their lake effect snow, for example, is just very miserable to live in most of the year. I prefer a hot humid Louisiana summer over a Chicago winter anyday, not to mention a Buffalo winter. Now in Ohio, Columbus and Cincinnati do still have decent economies and a good quality of life (and isn't as cold as Cleveland) but those are away from the Great Lakes, and Cleveland and Toledo are definitely miserable in comparison. In Indiana, Gary would be part of the Great Lakes area while Indianapolis not really.
You are making this a AGENDA of downplaying a region and cities on everything you can dig into. The North is remaking Dixie..... far far more then Dixie is itself. Major cities have much less Dixie in them.

When it is such a downplaying of this region. That includes whole states. Despite much of the state might not be Great Lakes related as parts closest.

It's amazing to discover the state debts and city debts of this booming Sunbelt region and booming states Assistance level populations to poverty. Some of Deep Dixie isn't either like Mississippi and Alabama and much of Louisiana. Seem as if forgotten by the boom of Corporate America steering migrations from the North. So you have aspects of your own Rust-belt areas and the woes and rising debts while booming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 07:28 AM
 
257 posts, read 160,474 times
Reputation: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Lennox 70 View Post
Baton Rouge is also relatively close to New Orleans, much closer than Mobile or Biloxi are, and is also one of the top 10 ports in the nation and a very important center for the oil and gas industry. In fact the Mississippi in between New Orleans and Baton Rouge is lined with refineries and petrochemical plants and port facilities. Lake Charles is also an important center for the energy industry including the new LNG terminal that's currently under construction, one of the largest in the world. There's also Tampa and Houston which are booming. You never see this kind of boom in the Great Lakes, an area people have fled in droves partly due to the economic conditions and partly due to the miserable weather. I just think the Great Lakes area, with their lake effect snow, for example, is just very miserable to live in most of the year. I prefer a hot humid Louisiana summer over a Chicago winter anyday, not to mention a Buffalo winter. Now in Ohio, Columbus and Cincinnati do still have decent economies and a good quality of life (and isn't as cold as Cleveland) but those are away from the Great Lakes, and Cleveland and Toledo are definitely miserable in comparison. In Indiana, Gary would be part of the Great Lakes area while Indianapolis not really.
It hasn't been mentioned yet, but Grand Rapids has definitely seen this boom and while not directly on the Great Lakes, it's MSA most certainly is.

Last edited by bartonro; 11-15-2019 at 08:43 AM.. Reason: Grammar
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 07:56 AM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,970,495 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by grega94 View Post
True, but it is still a navigable river that serves a different drainage basin, all the agricultural products and whatever else that is produced in Alabama are shipped down the Alabama/Mobile river, not the Mississippi river. Obliviously New Orleans will always be the larger city since it serves a much larger market, but to say Mobile doesn't have one is disingenuous.
Who said Mobile didn't have a market? I'm not sure what you're even arguing against right now.

Quote:
City (population) - City (Population): Ratio | distance in between
Buffalo (1,134,210) - Rochester (1,082,284): 0.95 | 66.62 miles
Seattle (3,939,363) - Portland (2,478,810): 0.63 | 145.17 miles
Washington (6,216,589) - Baltimore (2,802,789): 0.45 | 35.15 miles
Boston (4,628,910) - Providence (1,604,291): 0.35 | 41.15 miles
New Orleans (1,262,888) - Mobile (413,757): 0.33 | 131.34 miles
New York (19,979,477) - Philadelphia (6,096,120): 0.31 80.59 miles
Houston (6,997,384) - New Orleans (1,262,888): 0.18 | 317.53 miles
Chicago (9,533,040) - Milwaukee (1,572,245): 0.16 | 81.24 miles


So I guess you are right Milwaukee is not the best example, but there are plenty of other cities that beat New Orleans and Mobile, I guess the real surprising thing is how small New Orleans is, and true it doesn't have the best geographic lay out, but certainly another near by city could have sprouted as the hub for between international trade and domestic trade of the Mississippi river drainage basin, perhaps that city could've even been Mobile, or Biloxi?
Are you saying that another city could have been an additional hub or that one could have supplanted New Orleans as the hub?

Quote:
And the fact that the Gulf state doesn't have enough "economic" room to support multiple major cities tells you that the Great Lakes region is superior to the Gulf coast, with out the tourist/retirement industry of Florida and energy field of Texas, Houston and Tampa wouldn't even be as nearly large as they are now.
Obviously no city would be as large as it is without the key industries that support the local economy, but the major advantage of the Great Lakes cities is that they were much more industrial from the start and didn't have economies based on the "peculiar institution" that pretty much languished until the WWII era.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 07:56 AM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,892,967 times
Reputation: 4908
Quote:
Originally Posted by drro View Post
Milwaukee most certainly seems very rust-belt to me. Just have a look at the Courteen Seed building, that's about as industrial and gritty as it gets.

Not that there is anything wrong with being rust-belt. Personally, I greatly admire the gritty, industrial vibe of the rust-belt. To me, the rust-belt is the most attractive, beautiful region in the US.
Sure, every city has buildings like that, and every city has grit. Did you notice the links I attached, or were they too "not rust-belt" looking enough for you to acknowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2019, 07:58 AM
 
3,733 posts, read 2,892,967 times
Reputation: 4908
Gary, Indiana is a very small city of 76,000, and is only mentioned when people are trying to denigrate the Great Lakes Region.

Last edited by Enean; 11-15-2019 at 08:35 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 07:29 PM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,212 posts, read 3,299,341 times
Reputation: 4133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indentured Servant View Post
Well...Canada is the largest US trading partner if not usurped recently by China. The corridors of that trade comes through the Great lakes. Also, the Great Lakes region is HEAVILY populated. Outside of the Boston-Washington Corridor megalopolis, the Great Lakes region is the most densely and heavily population cluster/region in the nation.

So my vote goes for the Great Lakes region.....which includes Toronto. The main positive of the Gulf Coast region is population growth.
The trade gap between Canada and Mexico is very small, and port-wise, do the Great Lakes have an answer to New Orleans/Houston?


Its also hard to not notice the trends of population growth/decline in each region.


(yes, replying to an old post but the poll was left even)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top