Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2009, 11:59 PM
 
Location: At the center of the universe!
1,179 posts, read 2,062,979 times
Reputation: 383

Advertisements

Tyler, TX
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-06-2009, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC (in my mind)
7,943 posts, read 17,247,259 times
Reputation: 4686
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindin View Post
Jackson, MS. The only thing changing about that place is all the business closing and moving out to the suburbs each year. I lived there for 9 years, and got out when I could. I said the only way I'd return is either in a pine box or an urn. Or if I found out the world was ending, because they are 10-20 years behind many places.
Ditto for Little Rock, Arkansas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 01:28 PM
 
Location: Jolo, WV
7 posts, read 12,281 times
Reputation: 18
i dont think hardly any big southern city maybe 10000 or more is really southern thats how it is in wv for appalachian anyways too many people movin in
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 01:48 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by LovinDecatur View Post
Roanoke, VA
Raleigh, NC
Georgetown, SC
Beaufort, SC
Greenville, SC
Huntsville, AL
Mobile, AL
Murfreesboro, TN
Jackson, MS
Is that a joke?
I think one probably needs to look at cities with slower growth from migration. To remain relatively unchanged, a city can't sustain huge amounts of outside influence. Raleigh has been one of the fastest growing cities in America for decades and has had so much influence from outside the South that it's ridiculous to call it unchanged. The city alone has grown 42% in the 8 years since the 2000. It's MSA is the fastest growing in the US with Raleigh being the 8th fastest growing municipality over 100,000 in the USA in 2008. Its immediate suburb: Cary, was the 3rd fastest growing municipality over 100,000 in the USA in 2008. At almost 400,000 in the city limits alone, the population is almost double of what it was in 1990.
The challenge to all high growth cities is to retain what is best of you culture while allowing change to come to those parts that need the most work. Keep the good and toss the bad if at all possible.

Last edited by rnc2mbfl; 07-06-2009 at 02:05 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 09:29 PM
 
Location: metro ATL
8,180 posts, read 14,860,458 times
Reputation: 2698
"Relatively large" appears to be quite subjective in this thread. Tyler, TX? ROFL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 09:53 PM
 
4,574 posts, read 7,498,900 times
Reputation: 2613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 View Post
"Relatively large" appears to be quite subjective in this thread. Tyler, TX? ROFL!
It kind of has to be. Pretty much the majority of the South's largest cities have changed a lot.



Here's mine.

Fort Smith, Arkansas
Shreveport, Louisiana
Vicksburg, Mississippi
Pine Bluff, Arkansas
Texarkana, Texas/Arkansas
Charleston, South Carolina
Savannah, Georgia
Knoxville, Tennessee
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Macon, Georgia
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 10:34 PM
 
Location: At the center of the universe!
1,179 posts, read 2,062,979 times
Reputation: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 View Post
"Relatively large" appears to be quite subjective in this thread. Tyler, TX? ROFL!
Yes relatively large is pretty relative in here. I was comparing Tyler to the 8 million small towns you have in the south. It's relatively large compared to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2009, 11:04 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
296 posts, read 644,496 times
Reputation: 349
savannah, GA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 06:25 AM
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,450 posts, read 44,061,014 times
Reputation: 16804
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
Is that a joke?
I think one probably needs to look at cities with slower growth from migration. To remain relatively unchanged, a city can't sustain huge amounts of outside influence. Raleigh has been one of the fastest growing cities in America for decades and has had so much influence from outside the South that it's ridiculous to call it unchanged. The city alone has grown 42% in the 8 years since the 2000. It's MSA is the fastest growing in the US with Raleigh being the 8th fastest growing municipality over 100,000 in the USA in 2008. Its immediate suburb: Cary, was the 3rd fastest growing municipality over 100,000 in the USA in 2008. At almost 400,000 in the city limits alone, the population is almost double of what it was in 1990.
The challenge to all high growth cities is to retain what is best of you culture while allowing change to come to those parts that need the most work. Keep the good and toss the bad if at all possible.
No, it wasn't a joke. I'm well aware of Raleigh's growth and the changes that come with that, which is why I'm always surprised at how much Southern flavor it has retained. I believe that was what the OP was inquiring about, wasn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2009, 06:41 AM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,549,608 times
Reputation: 6790
Of "relatively large cities" Jackson, Mississippi seems to have the highest percentage "born in state." If you want bigger Birmingham, Alabama is apparently 82.7% "born in state."

//www.city-data.com/top2/h166.html

I seem to recall reading that Lafayette, Louisiana has kept a good deal of old Cajun culture alive. Although it's apparently touristy so might not have kept its old ways up that well. I think Savannah, mentioned above, might be a good choice too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top