Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-23-2023, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Born + raised SF Bay; Tyler, TX now WNY
8,505 posts, read 4,747,409 times
Reputation: 8429

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
I think it’s perfectly reasonable to not consider Salinas a city 90 miles from SF as a SF suburb.

It’s so weird SF and DC are so desperate for status they pretend places 100 miles away are actually part of their city.
It’s not and on the ground Salinas doesn’t operate that way either. I don’t remember ever hearing anybody trying to count Salinas. Heck we used to debate on whether Santa Cruz should be in our “club”! I even think it’s dicey to include a lot of the spillover into the delta/Central Valley even though that growth is directly tied to the nuckin’ futs housing situation in the Bay Area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-23-2023, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Medfid
6,815 posts, read 6,051,327 times
Reputation: 5262
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Again this is because Counties too rough to accurately capture metros in areas with dense base populations. Mansfield isn’t in the Boston MSA not because it isn’t a Boston suburb but
Exactly my point - if I have to choose between a meaningless, Frankenstein definition that ignores towns that are unarguably suburbs of Boston and a definition that includes everything important plus some cow pastures in central NH, I’m going to choose the latter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2023, 11:09 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,156 posts, read 39,430,503 times
Reputation: 21253
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
I think it’s perfectly reasonable to not consider Salinas a city 90 miles from SF as a SF suburb.

It’s so weird SF and DC are so desperate for status they pretend places 100 miles away are actually part of their city.
It's odd to characterize this as the cities themselves being desperate for status as I don't think the cities care at all. What's happening is probably more along the lines that they are fairly strong economic engines with high paying salaries and very costly real estate nearby so people are going much further out for that lower cost of living while the salary is still large enough to make the grueling commutes an acceptable trade-off for them. Remember, CSAs are done via a fairly low threshold (far from majority) for county-level commuting patterns among the workforce.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2023, 11:58 AM
 
Location: On the Waterfront
1,676 posts, read 1,089,771 times
Reputation: 2507
Based on the new numbers, Chicago looks like it has a solid hold on the #3 spot for several years to come.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2023, 12:14 PM
 
14,023 posts, read 15,032,674 times
Reputation: 10471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Shudra View Post
Exactly my point - if I have to choose between a meaningless, Frankenstein definition that ignores towns that are unarguably suburbs of Boston and a definition that includes everything important plus some cow pastures in central NH, I’m going to choose the latter.
The thing is MSA’s might not have the correct people but it roughly cancels out of who’s in but shouldn’t be and who’s out who should be in. (Frankly Most MSA’s are probably 10-12% too big)

I don’t think correctly assigning Mansfield or to Boston is a good trade for pretending Laconia NH, Gardner MA or Westerly RI are in any way Metro Boston.

You are I guess correct in most cases that CSA’s aggressiveness in annexation is “cow pastures” but in Boston, DC , SF and Cleveland’s case the issue is it’s not Cow pastures, its Providence, Baltimore, San Jose and Canton that are absurdly grafted on where they don’t belong.

Even Merrimack County NH which is largely rural has 155,000 people it’s not nothing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2023, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee
1,733 posts, read 1,897,707 times
Reputation: 1594
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCity76 View Post
Based on the new numbers, Chicago looks like it has a solid hold on the #3 spot for several years to come.
How So? the Gap Between Chi and Metro Dallas just closed by 200,000, Now it's easier than ever for Dallas to leap past Chicago
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2023, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Shelby County, Tennessee
1,733 posts, read 1,897,707 times
Reputation: 1594
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdw1084 View Post
Here are the new MSA numbers based on the updated metropolitan delineations:

Updated MSAs (4 million plus)

New York MSA: 19,557,311
Los Angeles MSA: 12,872,322
Chicago MSA: 9,274,200
Dallas MSA: 7,943,685
Houston MSA: 7,368,466
Washington MSA: 6,265,183
Philadelphia MSA: 6,241,163
Atlanta MSA: 6,237,435

Miami MSA: 6,139,330
Phoenix MSA: 5,015,678
Boston MSA: 4,900,550
Riverside MSA: 4,667,558
San Francisco MSA: 4,579,599
Detroit MSA: 4,345,761
Seattle MSA: 4,034,248

Quick Takeaways: The 6 million metros are very close in population. Only 126,000 people separate Miami and Washington. Seattle finally entered the 4 million club. Dallas will hit 8 million next year. Boston and San Francisco may align more with their CSA population or at least some of it because the MSA population feels too small for those two cities.
Poor Philadelphia, let's Toast to Philadelphia's final days as 7th largest Metro. Philly will still be a Great City
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2023, 07:54 PM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,435 posts, read 6,307,587 times
Reputation: 3827
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdw1084 View Post
Here are the new MSA numbers based on the updated metropolitan delineations:

Updated MSAs (4 million plus)

New York MSA: 19,557,311
Los Angeles MSA: 12,872,322
Chicago MSA: 9,274,200
Dallas MSA: 7,943,685
Houston MSA: 7,368,466
Washington MSA: 6,265,183
Philadelphia MSA: 6,241,163
Atlanta MSA: 6,237,435
Miami MSA: 6,139,330
Phoenix MSA: 5,015,678
Boston MSA: 4,900,550
Riverside MSA: 4,667,558
San Francisco MSA: 4,579,599
Detroit MSA: 4,345,761
Seattle MSA: 4,034,248

Quick Takeaways: The 6 million metros are very close in population. Only 126,000 people separate Miami and Washington. Seattle finally entered the 4 million club. Dallas will hit 8 million next year. Boston and San Francisco may align more with their CSA population or at least some of it because the MSA population feels too small for those two cities.
This number for DFW is from 2022. We should have already passed 8 million this year.

Atlanta has most likely already passed Philly and possibly DC depending on how much growth they might see this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2023, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Green Country
2,868 posts, read 2,822,843 times
Reputation: 4798
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdw1084 View Post
Here are the new MSA numbers based on the updated metropolitan delineations:

Updated MSAs (4 million plus)

New York MSA: 19,557,311
Los Angeles MSA: 12,872,322
Chicago MSA: 9,274,200
Dallas MSA: 7,943,685
Houston MSA: 7,368,466
Washington MSA: 6,265,183
Philadelphia MSA: 6,241,163
Atlanta MSA: 6,237,435
Miami MSA: 6,139,330
Phoenix MSA: 5,015,678
Boston MSA: 4,900,550
Riverside MSA: 4,667,558
San Francisco MSA: 4,579,599
Detroit MSA: 4,345,761
Seattle MSA: 4,034,248

Quick Takeaways: The 6 million metros are very close in population. Only 126,000 people separate Miami and Washington. Seattle finally entered the 4 million club. Dallas will hit 8 million next year. Boston and San Francisco may align more with their CSA population or at least some of it because the MSA population feels too small for those two cities.
Seattle entered the 4 million MSA club 3 years ago. It's MSA boundaries were unchanged. It's just been stagnant since.

2020 Pop. 4,027,487
2021 Pop. 4,016,274
2022 Pop. 4,034,248
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2023, 08:10 PM
 
Location: Marshall-Shadeland, Pittsburgh, PA
32,620 posts, read 77,632,563 times
Reputation: 19102
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRedTide View Post
Poor Philadelphia, let's Toast to Philadelphia's final days as 7th largest Metro. Philly will still be a Great City
Yeah. Sadly Pennsylvania is the poster child of stagnation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top