Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-06-2016, 10:36 AM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,934,547 times
Reputation: 4561

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
The poor will get it free, so the middle class will end up paying the bill.
In my province in Canada, nobody pays, except through taxes. Once one combines the average tax rate and healthcare premium, deductible and co-pay, in most states (not Florida where there is no state income tax) it ends up being cheaper in Canada.

33% cheaper as a percentage of GDP. With better outcomes.

Canadians live longer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2016, 02:36 PM
 
Location: New York
1,186 posts, read 968,366 times
Reputation: 2970
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
The poor will get it free, so the middle class will end up paying the bill.

The middle class already pays the bill in the form of now-mandatory-post-ACA healthcare premiums which are only rising for many. Often thousands of dollars a year. As the poster above mentions, it is highly unlikely that a universal system would eclipse this in terms of dollars per year expended, even with an income tax increase. Part of these high costs account for shifting the inherent 'risk' in any insurance-based system that some people using the system will default on their medical bills or receive more in net benefits than they pay out in premiums/deductibles/co-pays. If someone doesn't pay the costs just get passed to the other policy holders.

Also, eliminating high deductibles and co-pays should be considered a net gain as well when calculating the relative costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2016, 03:15 PM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,497,727 times
Reputation: 12187
Quote:
Originally Posted by ram2 View Post
The poor will get it free, so the middle class will end up paying the bill.

The same thing happens in private workplace healthcare. Everyone gets the same insurance and co pay but a few workers are far more productive while other people do the bare minimum to avoid getting fired. Ditto with sick / vacation time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2016, 10:29 PM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,567 posts, read 24,096,042 times
Reputation: 24012
Our current system is a dysfunctional mess. Many have no coverage and even folks that have coverage routinely shell out $
in out of pocket payments. We have to eliminate the profit motives in healthcare, as a start. UH is way overdue in our great country, we need to implement it for everyone NOW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,350,249 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
In my province in Canada, nobody pays, except through taxes. Once one combines the average tax rate and healthcare premium, deductible and co-pay, in most states (not Florida where there is no state income tax) it ends up being cheaper in Canada.

33% cheaper as a percentage of GDP. With better outcomes.

Canadians live longer.
So smug. Trade southern borders with the U.S. and watch those costs climb and lifespans diminish, amigo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 05:37 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,934,547 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
So smug. Trade southern borders with the U.S. and watch those costs climb and lifespans diminish, amigo.
Ah, yes, those Mexicans.

Wonder whose jobs they are taking? There appear to be many living in inner cities who won't do the work that Mexicans do. Oh well, must be coincidence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,350,249 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
Ah, yes, those Mexicans.

Wonder whose jobs they are taking? There appear to be many living in inner cities who won't do the work that Mexicans do. Oh well, must be coincidence.
The topic is healthcare costs. Comparing ethnically homogeneous, sparsely-populated Canada to the US and our huge, diverse population is an exercise in incongruity.

Last edited by Yeledaf; 04-18-2016 at 06:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 07:25 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,934,547 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeledaf View Post
The topic is healthcare costs. Comparing ethnically homogeneous, sparsely-populated Canada to the US and our huge, diverse population is an exercise in incongruity.
Canada ethnically homogeneous? You haven't been in Toronto or Vancouver or any of the other major cities, have you?

But let's not go by perceptions. Let's look at some research. By a group everyone agrees has credibility, Pew Research. In this map, darker green is more diverse. Even Mexico is more diverse than USA, and Canada much more.



And the 33 page study with details, statistics and indepth charts are here:

http://www.eea-esem.com/files/papers...lopment-v6.pdf

Facts, not perceptions, count.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 07:35 PM
 
Location: louisville
4,754 posts, read 2,743,571 times
Reputation: 1721
Very little understanding of healthcare rules and operability on cd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 07:58 PM
 
Location: Atlantis
3,016 posts, read 3,913,692 times
Reputation: 8867
Mandatory health insurance is such a great idea that life insurance should also be required by law, of course also based on income and resulting in a fine if it is not obtained.


Because insurance is so important and necessary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top