Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-04-2019, 10:19 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,512,088 times
Reputation: 25816

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey2k View Post
No, you don't get to use the "fair share" argument unless you are proposing the people who don't pay any taxes now start chipping in. They are certainly not paying their "fair share".

And as noted, the richest people already pay way more than their fair share.

And whether someone works hard enough to earn any particular amount of money is not your decision. It's between the person making the money and their employer and/or customer(s). If the latter didn't think it was worth it, they wouldn't be parting with their money.

I am sick of the massive sense of entitlement of the left. Your whole economic policy boils down to "Gimme gimme gimme! I want what you have and I'm going to use the government to take it from you."
I propose Amazon start chipping in. How much did they pay in taxes last year again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2019, 11:43 AM
 
1,586 posts, read 1,127,290 times
Reputation: 5169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
I propose Amazon start chipping in. How much did they pay in taxes last year again?

You want to target a business and make them pay more then their peers in the same industry?

Great idea, what could go wrong? /sarcasm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2019, 12:49 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,920,234 times
Reputation: 43660
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Loud View Post
You want to target a business and make them pay more then their peers in the same industry?
Have to start somewhere.
Once Jeff feels the bite he'll do what he can to share to load with the others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2019, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
1,406 posts, read 800,235 times
Reputation: 3328
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
Have to start somewhere.
Once Jeff feels the bite he'll do what he can to share to load with the others.
The wealthy are already paying more, both as a percentage of their income and total dollar amount. By an incredibly large amount.

Like I said, "Gimme gimme gimme".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2019, 02:14 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,920,234 times
Reputation: 43660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey2k View Post
The wealthy are already paying more...
It would be really hard for them not to be.
What does that have to do with anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2019, 02:23 PM
 
10,609 posts, read 5,639,469 times
Reputation: 18905
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
I propose Amazon start chipping in. How much did they pay in taxes last year again?
I see you never studied Economics. There are some excellent free online resources should you feel motivated to learn.

One of the fundamental lessons of economics is that the entity that bears the statutory burden of a tax has nothing to do with where the burden of that tax ultimately falls. "Statutory burden" means the entity that, by law/regulation, must fill out a tax form & send it with money off to the IRS and to various state and local taxing authorities.

Any statutory burden of a tax on a corporation is allocated as follows:
  • X% is borne by customers in the form of prices higher than they otherwise would be
  • Y% is borne by employees in the form of total compensation (and hours worked) lower than they otherwise would be
  • Z% is borne by business owners (shareholders) in the form of profits lower than they otherwise would be

...where X+Y+Z=1.0 (that is, X%+Y%+Z%=100.0%)

Sooo... corporations merely collect & forward tax revenue to the IRS. The burden of that statutory tax is always allocated to a combination of customers, employees, and business owners (shareholders).

That is, 100% of corporate income tax obligations are paid by PEOPLE. Actual, real, breathing, tangible, live people.

Zero Percent of any corporate income tax obligation falls on the shoulder of a corporation. Zero. Percent.

To the extent a corporation is able to minimize a tax burden, that just means customers didn't have to pay a higher price, employees get paid more (and work more), and business owners (shareholders) make more profit.

There quite literally is no place else for the corporate tax to flow: it must go to a combination of the three.

If you didn't understand me, here are a few hyperlinks that you can follow to get more detail or perhaps a better explanation.

http://www.econport.org/content/hand...incidence.html
https://www.khanacademy.org/economic...-tax-incidence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_incidence
http://ase.tufts.edu/economics/papers/200607.pdf

The assertion that "huge corporations got a tax break" in the TCJA is 100% false. Corporations do not bear the burden of income taxes so they cannot get a tax break.

That last sentence bears repeating lest you accidentally misread it: Corporations do not bear the burden of income taxes so they cannot get a tax break.

Corporations merely collect and forward tax receipts from people. Similarly, because corporations do not incur the burden of taxes, any time you raise corporate tax rates, you are merely raising taxes on actual people.

The assertion by all the candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination that they will raise income taxes on "huge corporations" is also disingenuous. If that comes to pass, 100% of that tax increase will fall on the shoulders of actual people: customers in the form of prices that are higher than they otherwise would be, employees in the form of lower total compensation & fewer hours worked compared to what they otherwise would be, and owners in the form of profits that are lower than they otherwise would be.

Corporations do NOT pay taxes, period. They merely collect and forward taxes.

Think about it this way: when you go to a retail store and buy stuff, look at your receipt and you will see you paid some sales tax (well, that is true in 45 of the 50 states; the other 5 do not have a sales tax). So... you paid sales tax on your purchases, right?

Nope. You did NOT pay sales tax. You did NOT file a form with your state sales tax authority and remit money to them. The retailer did. So the Retailer paid the sales tax (along with filing the paper work).

But wait! Every Housewife knows she actually paid the sales tax - it is there on the receipt, even though the retailer is the one who actually filed the paperwork and sent off money. Every Housewife understands the retailer is "collecting and forwarding" sales tax revenue to the state and the burden falls on the shoulder of the shopper; the same is true with regard to corporate income taxes: the corporation "collects and forwards" income tax, where the economic burden of that income tax falls on the shoulders of actual people: customers in the form of prices higher than they otherwise would be, employees in the form of total compensation & hours worked lower than they otherwise would be, and owners (shareholders) in the form of profits lower than they otherwise would be.

So the question is, are you as erudite as Every Housewife?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2019, 02:46 PM
 
1,586 posts, read 1,127,290 times
Reputation: 5169
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
Have to start somewhere.
Once Jeff feels the bite he'll do what he can to share to load with the others.
Seriously... You want your government to target a business. You now mention an individual.

Let's get this straight... You want your government to target individual people?

Last edited by 2Loud; 11-04-2019 at 03:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2019, 03:57 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,920,234 times
Reputation: 43660
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Loud View Post
Seriously...
Seriously... we're 250 posts into a click bait thread.
If you think anyone is having their minds changed by anything said at this late stage
or even that anything said is any way some sort of new perspective on anything important...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2019, 06:23 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,664,723 times
Reputation: 14050
It is due to anger, hopelessness, lack of education and lack of society/community.

It's a very real question and it has real answers.

Just enough people would rather see others hurt ("we own the libs!") than see a better country and world for themselves and their families...add that to the minority who believe in Sky Beings and who do what the Preacher, Boss or other "Leader" tells them to do and that can swing an election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-04-2019, 06:39 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas & San Diego
6,913 posts, read 3,370,512 times
Reputation: 8629
Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
Big Business is very organized and have tons of lobbyists to represent them.
But, it is evil when labor organizes.
No, labor unions are evil when they force joining to keep a job.

Quote:
Originally Posted by J746NEW View Post
All those factories closed up shop and moved to Communist China where unions are banned.
Got to love labor under communism where workers have no rights.
Got to ask why all these factories left, couldn't possibly be because unions made it too expensive.

BTW - what worker rights do you get when the jobs leave?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top