Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Someone asked directly about a specific situation, and I answered. You didn't read it. You also didn't read where I said that there were a number of ways that I could handle it. You made an assumption, and that assumption was not valid.
My "assumption" is quite valid, considering "one of the ways" you discussed handling it was physical assault, which led to a discussion on the legality of said internet tough guy response.
Your assumption, your erroneous assumption, seemed to indicate that you thought it was my only available response. That is where you a fool, for being unable to read the responses given. But if forced to do so, I might be driven to respond to rudeness in just that way. Of course, when I ran that sandwich shop, I'd just toss the rude people out. Do you have any idea how many people don't like rude people, but are afraid to do anything to the people? To confront them?
Your assumption, your erroneous assumption, seemed to indicate that you thought it was my only available response. That is where you a fool, for being unable to read the responses given. But if forced to do so, I might be driven to respond to rudeness in just that way. Of course, when I ran that sandwich shop, I'd just toss the rude people out. Do you have any idea how many people don't like rude people, but are afraid to do anything to the people? To confront them?
I understand you with rude people but, unless physically attacked you have no reason to ASSAULT anyone. Especially if they are only talking to you even if what they are saying you dont agree with or find rude.
Your assumption, your erroneous assumption, seemed to indicate that you thought it was my only available response. That is where you a fool, for being unable to read the responses given. But if forced to do so, I might be driven to respond to rudeness in just that way. Of course, when I ran that sandwich shop, I'd just toss the rude people out. Do you have any idea how many people don't like rude people, but are afraid to do anything to the people? To confront them?
Why are you trying to deflect from the issue WE were discussing?
The illegality of assaulting someone because they offended you.
Is your attempt at misdirection your way of admitting that assault not only isn't a socially responsible reaction to PDA's, but illegal as well?
TK, the law takes hate crimes a little more seriously than they do petty crimes. If you assault a gay person just for being gay, you surely will end up locked up.
I understand you with rude people but, unless physically attacked you have no reason to ASSAULT anyone. Especially if they are only talking to you even if what they are saying you dont agree with or find rude.
I had to physically throw people out of the shop because they would not respond to a verbal request to leave.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
