Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-21-2016, 07:24 AM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,611,637 times
Reputation: 17654

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillobyte View Post
Like say for example, Lou Gehrig's Disease (ALS) one of the worst diagnoses a person could get. I've been watching numerous video on YouTube of people and their families coping with various diseases and Gehrig's is about the worst I've seen. I've had many meetings with myself and have decided that if I ever got a terminal diagnosis like this I would just move to Oregon and use their law. Anyone else feel the same?
Yes, I wish the law would pass in my state. I don't see why I shouldn't be able to make the choice to safely and peacefully end my life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-21-2016, 07:29 AM
 
21,884 posts, read 12,970,292 times
Reputation: 36895
So it looks like I'm the only one with any religious, ethical, or moral compunction against suicide here. Always in the minority!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2016, 12:12 PM
 
Location: AZ
757 posts, read 838,324 times
Reputation: 3375
Quote:
Originally Posted by otterhere View Post
So it looks like I'm the only one with any religious, ethical, or moral compunction against suicide here. Always in the minority!
You are certainly entitled to your view. I find no fault with that whatever. I just do not want your view controlling my decision making. The problem is technology has forced itself into medical issues which enables the prolonging of life despite inevitable outcomes. If this were in the 1800s and before, or even half or more of the 1900s, we would have little choice about dying sooner rather than later. I find it odd that we are not willing to use technology to enable a more pleasant departure from this life as opposed to an agonizing one not to mention bankrupting families for no good reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2016, 01:59 PM
 
21,884 posts, read 12,970,292 times
Reputation: 36895
I would rather NOT hold this view, actually, but the question certainly enters my mind. A greater theologian than I might hold the answer but, at present, I'm unsure what it is. I agree that these are new problems; even fifty years ago, people just died, and often quite suddenly and unavoidably. Big Pharma has eradicated the fast and relatively painless deaths (heart attack, stroke, arrhythmias) and left us to the long, lingering, slow death -- in nursing homes, for most. I can't call that "progress," exactly. But I'm unsure how much (more) control we should wrest from God. As for "bankrupting families," I find that argument always distasteful. The old person who wants to live to 100 has every right to, even if it uses up every penny of HIS OR HER money, however much it may be coveted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2016, 04:43 PM
 
Location: AZ
757 posts, read 838,324 times
Reputation: 3375
Quote:
Originally Posted by otterhere View Post
I would rather NOT hold this view, actually, but the question certainly enters my mind. A greater theologian than I might hold the answer but, at present, I'm unsure what it is. I agree that these are new problems; even fifty years ago, people just died, and often quite suddenly and unavoidably. Big Pharma has eradicated the fast and relatively painless deaths (heart attack, stroke, arrhythmias) and left us to the long, lingering, slow death -- in nursing homes, for most. I can't call that "progress," exactly. But I'm unsure how much (more) control we should wrest from God. As for "bankrupting families," I find that argument always distasteful. The old person who wants to live to 100 has every right to, even if it uses up every penny of HIS OR HER money, however much it may be coveted.



The number one reason for bankruptcy in the USA is medical expenses. I fully agree that a person has every right to do with their money as they see fit to include drawing an agonizing breath to the very end.

However, I care for my family more than I care for me. I KNOW what happens post death of a family member as I imagine you do. I have over 7 decades behind me and I've seen a lot, maybe too much. I do not want to depart this life leaving my family in worse financial condition than when I was here on this side. The medical bills start arriving after the old boy is in the ground or his ashes are in the rose bed. No one thinks of that but reality shows up and slaps the survivors hard.

I have no desire personally to live into an age where I cannot care for myself. Nursing homes are pits, money pits. They are stalls for people and like those of horses smell like a stall. The only difference is the horse stall is cleaned daily thoroughly. At least at my stable.

Is it God's will that my family be impoverished to keep this wad of dust alive? Is it His will that I should fear dying which is why most people want to go for that few extra days or weeks or months? I prefer the good help from a good doctor to go my way and so if necessary I will make the trip to Switzerland or set up housekeeping in Oregon or some other location for "help". I prefer not to do it myself but I might screw up enough courage to do it. I hate pain and suffering.

Of course the medical industry opposes assisted dying. What a milk cow the last six months of life are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2016, 07:24 PM
 
965 posts, read 939,042 times
Reputation: 1933
Quote:
Originally Posted by otterhere View Post
So it looks like I'm the only one with any religious, ethical, or moral compunction against suicide here. Always in the minority!
Do we take this to mean that you believe that everyone else who commented is non-religious, unethical, and immoral? Oh and without any compunction?
It is a moot point if it is against your religion for goodness sake. If you think you will go to hell, or that it is against gods will if you commit suicide, period - why would you even comment?

This was a question, not about factual actions. I read what everyone else said, and it didn't look to me like anyone was saying yee haw, let's kill ourselves because life is a drag.

I read it as a question in regards to whether one might utilize death with dignity. Yes or no would have done, but counting yourself as superior in regards to your opinion does seem to have left you in the minority.
This question was not about you, your religion, ethics, and moral compunction. I dont say that to try to shame you, just to make a point.

A decision like this would likely include at the very least; ones ethics, and morals, though I dare say it would be far more likely to do with the end of devastating, and sometimes nearly endless pain. There is a reason it is referred to as death with dignity.

My answer is yes, I would choose it if necessary, under the right / wrong circumstances, and NO ONE else's religion, morals or ethics would play a part in my decision making.

Oh and I do have strong feelings about suicide, but that has nothing to do with this post/question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 09:53 AM
 
21,884 posts, read 12,970,292 times
Reputation: 36895
"Do we take this to mean that you believe that everyone else who commented is non-religious, unethical, and immoral? Oh and without any compunction?"


No.


"If you think you will go to hell, or that it is against gods will if you commit suicide, period - why would you even comment?"


Because, obviously, with the recent advances in medical technology, the line is blurred and the question is no longer a simple one. We can now extend life (depending upon your definition of "life") almost indefinitely. Is passively denying yourself the means of extending your life the moral equivalent of taking active measures to end your life? The answer is also no longer a simple one, at least in my mind.


But perhaps this is a topic for the "Philosophy" or "Religion" forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2016, 08:50 PM
 
Location: Hawaii
1,688 posts, read 4,299,513 times
Reputation: 3108
Quote:
Originally Posted by otterhere View Post
So it looks like I'm the only one with any religious, ethical, or moral compunction against suicide here. Always in the minority!
If God didn't want death with dignity, he wouldn't have given it us...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,810,729 times
Reputation: 39453
I do not trust doctors enough to do that. They misdiagnose all the time. Plus I am not sure how I feel about that from a moral/religious perspective. I would need to do a lot of thinking about it if I was certain the diagnosis was correct. I also would not want to leave my family bankrupt just so I could have a few extra years of suffering. It is not so much about leaving money for my kids, but my wife is pretty much dependent on me since she gave up her career to be a professional mom for several decades. Further, while my kids are not entitled to anything, I would not want to spend all that might be left to them to make their lives easier on wasted medical procedures to try to alleviate the pain or other suffering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2016, 11:34 AM
 
21,884 posts, read 12,970,292 times
Reputation: 36895
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyvin View Post
If God didn't want death with dignity, he wouldn't have given it us...

Well, there's that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top