Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Hockey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which of the following cities deserve an NHL team?
Quebec City 18 32.14%
Halifax 4 7.14%
Hartford 16 28.57%
Hamilton 12 21.43%
Seattle 19 33.93%
Portland 8 14.29%
San Francisco 3 5.36%
Minneapolis 4 7.14%
Cleveland 9 16.07%
Cincinatti 3 5.36%
Saracuse/Rochester/Albany (Upstate NY) 4 7.14%
Indianapolis 5 8.93%
Kansas City 13 23.21%
Winnipeg 25 44.64%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-31-2009, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Midwest
4,666 posts, read 5,094,408 times
Reputation: 6829

Advertisements

Phoenix should move back to Winnipeg; one of the Florida teams should move to Quebec City; Nashville should move to Kansas City
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2009, 08:56 PM
 
Location: Toronto
1,654 posts, read 5,856,245 times
Reputation: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaToby View Post
Kansas City didn't have a good team either. A cadaver would have lost interest. Phoenix is having similar problems. Denver and Atlanta may follow.

Doesn't Minneapolis already have a NHL club in its sister city next door in Saint Paul?

I wonder why Houston isn't on the list? Houston is as large as Dallas, larger than every city on the list.

Frankly, to spread hockey as a sport into a new city, the NHL needs to think of placing a good team in the new city. Not division winners mind you, but something above doormat status.....
I wanted to choose more realistic teams, regardless of a cities size.. the people have to like the sport itself, numbers come after. By looking at the teams that are struggling at the moment, almost all of them hail from the south. That tells me that the south doesn't have much of an interest in the sport itself. Look at Phoenix, metro of over 4 million, yet can't fill their seats to 70% capacity for a single game.. to spite tickets going for $7, and quite a small minority given free. Population in numbers means nothing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 09:26 PM
 
Location: Edwardsville, IL
1,814 posts, read 2,498,236 times
Reputation: 1472
[quote=SeaToby;10025756]Kansas City didn't have a good team either. A cadaver would have lost interest. Phoenix is having similar problems. Denver and Atlanta may follow.

If you are referring to the KC Scouts of the 74-76 seasons, then yes. However, KC is 34 years older and wiser, and has a gorgeous, new state-of-the-art arena, and is a good sports city.

Phoenix may fold (bankruptcy). Denver/Colorado has always had a good hockey base (DU, Colorado College, Minor Leagues, etc.) and the Avalanche have a solid fan base.

I'm not sure about Atlanta. Large market, but I remember when the Flames moved to Calgary in 1980.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2009, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Moose Jaw, in between the Moose's butt and nose.
5,152 posts, read 8,529,163 times
Reputation: 2038
Quote:
Originally Posted by amark View Post
Florida -------> Seattle
Phoenix --------> Winnipeg
NY Islanders ------> Quebec City
Atlanta -------> Minneapolis

Seattle is definitely the #1 spot to relocate to in my opinion. The fan base is there and the metro area is over 1 mil larger than Vancouver which easily holds it own. Also, having a team in Seattle would let people from Portland drive up to Seattle to watch a game. Plus, the Vancouver-Seattle rivalry would be intense!
Atlanta--------> Minneapolis?
Minneapolis, basically already has a team, the Wild (play literally next door in St. Paul).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2009, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
109 posts, read 319,612 times
Reputation: 76
Las Vegas!!!!



Just kiddingIt would never work here. You think the flack Phoenix gets is bad....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2009, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,701,378 times
Reputation: 9980
Phoenix deserves a real team
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2009, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,701,378 times
Reputation: 9980
Quote:
Originally Posted by TominLasVegas View Post
Las Vegas!!!!



Just kiddingIt would never work here. You think the flack Phoenix gets is bad....
Actually Las Vegas could make it work if they called the team the Las Vegas Victims. Then tourists from cities like Detroit, Philadelphia and New york, where you can't touch a ticket could come watch their home team pound the victims
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2009, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
109 posts, read 319,612 times
Reputation: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Actually Las Vegas could make it work if they called the team the Las Vegas Victims. Then tourists from cities like Detroit, Philadelphia and New york, where you can't touch a ticket could come watch their home team pound the victims

LOL victims!


Las Vegas Slush
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2009, 10:37 AM
 
131 posts, read 219,528 times
Reputation: 66
Winnepeg Halifax and Quebec city?

The Winnepeg and Quebec city teams have failed and moved out.
Those locations cannot support NHL hockey.
Halifax is way too small a market.

Hamilton is a tiny market but would thrive on what would in reality be toronto money.

So what really belongs on that list as far as canadian cities is second team toronto.

Some of those US cities could support NHL hockey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2009, 01:06 AM
 
Location: Toronto
1,654 posts, read 5,856,245 times
Reputation: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWhale View Post
Winnepeg Halifax and Quebec city?

The Winnepeg and Quebec city teams have failed and moved out.
Those locations cannot support NHL hockey.
Halifax is way too small a market.

Hamilton is a tiny market but would thrive on what would in reality be toronto money.

So what really belongs on that list as far as canadian cities is second team toronto.

Some of those US cities could support NHL hockey.

You can't solely look at the city population itself for numbers.. it's not like arena seats will sell to only city specific citizens.. Halifax could draw fans throughout all maritime provinces as well as New England (tell me how Green Bay with a population of under 100k can support an NFL team). Hamilton is a HUGE market.. exactly why Balsillie is putting over $200 million into relocating a team there. Hell if they're willing to put teams in Florida and Arizona, could a relocation to QC or Winnipeg be that detrimental to the league?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Hockey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top