Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House > Home Interior Design and Decorating
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-25-2013, 02:55 PM
 
Location: In the city
1,581 posts, read 3,852,303 times
Reputation: 2417

Advertisements

I ran across this blog and thought it was interesting. As an urban dweller, I am painfully aware of the premium charged for square footage. What is the smallest space you would live in?

Intentionally Small | exploring small spaces and simple living
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-25-2013, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Saint Paul, MN
1,365 posts, read 1,883,557 times
Reputation: 2987
I am lucky to live in an area that is urban without being hugely congested. Before my SO moved in with me he was in a 900 square foot 1-BR. I spent a lot of time visiting him there, and I think that would be about the minimum area I could live in without feeling markedly cramped and uncomfortable. Of course, if the situation demanded it, I could live pretty much anywhere. But under about a thousand square feet would not be a fun living situation.

Last edited by StPaulGal; 11-25-2013 at 05:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2013, 08:22 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,550 posts, read 81,103,317 times
Reputation: 57750
Now that the kids have grown up the 3,000 sf we have is more than we need, but I would still want at least 1,800. Our first house was 1,100, 2nd 1,400 and it's been so nice to have a little elbow room I hate to give up all of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2013, 08:23 PM
 
Location: SW Missouri
15,852 posts, read 35,122,669 times
Reputation: 22695
Quote:
Originally Posted by confusedasusual View Post
I ran across this blog and thought it was interesting. As an urban dweller, I am painfully aware of the premium charged for square footage. What is the smallest space you would live in?

Intentionally Small | exploring small spaces and simple living
Our home is about 765 square feet. I could be happy in a smaller space if I didn't have so much junk. If I could get a big storage building, I could be happy with 500 feet if it was laid out well.

20yrsinBranson
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 08:55 AM
 
Location: In the city
1,581 posts, read 3,852,303 times
Reputation: 2417
I am pretty comfortable in a small space myself-- I lived in a studio that was about 465 sq ft for a while without issue. I do agree that layout makes a huge difference. I thought it was very cleansing to only live with what you need and not have room for a lot of other stuff. My current apartment is 920 sq ft and it feels huge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 09:09 AM
 
Location: southwestern PA
22,568 posts, read 47,624,621 times
Reputation: 48178
As others have mentioned, it is not about the square footage, but about the flow and layout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Johns Creek, GA
17,472 posts, read 66,010,995 times
Reputation: 23621
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Chick View Post
...it is not about the square footage...
It's everything about square footage(or lack there of) in NYC!

The smallest apartment in New York
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 12:53 PM
 
4,213 posts, read 6,901,334 times
Reputation: 7177
Not sure what the smallest space we could live in is, but after owning our first house (2500ft²) for 3.5 years, we definitely could do with much, much less space if they layout was done smartly for the small space.

Dream house for us is definitely a tiny, modern house within walking distance of amenities. Been looking hard for land around us to hold and potentially build on in the future since we have a great downtown and land in the vicinity is relatively cheap considering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Prospect, KY
5,284 posts, read 20,045,077 times
Reputation: 6666
1500 sf...we have almost 3400 now - but we could pare down to 1500 for the two of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2013, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,325 posts, read 5,507,417 times
Reputation: 2596
I moved from 670 sq. ft. to 2300. It's funny how I had no problem living in the small space but I'm sure I'd feel claustrophobic there now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > House > Home Interior Design and Decorating
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top