Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107
gold is gold for protection and a store of value. no gold stock can lay claim to that.
even with dividends most if not all gold stocks failed to out perform gold long term..
|
Actually, my post was about the fact that gold miners are just now
starting to pay dividends.
In your statement "
even with dividends" ... you are talking about "
even with" the 0.8% dividend which
was the best dividend being paid by American or Canadian miners just a little over a year ago.
Long-term, a basket of miners tracks gold pretty well.
Up until less than a year ago, no dividend from any minor was a factor.
If the miners continue to raise dividends and we start seeing companies that pay 5-6% yields - even
with the volatility - a retired person, looking for protection, but also needing yield, could buy these.
My original post was simply highlighting this. Things change.
Again, I have tracked the price of gold and the price of the stocks from 1983 to 2008
and there was no benefit to holding the miners unless you were doing some trading
and balancing. Since 2008, you are totally right, the metal has been far superior.
Things change.
One of the things that is changing is that China is buying, or trying to buy, resource companies - like gold miners.
Even if they don't own a substantial presence is US/Canadian miners, buying up others means the N. American miners will be worth a premium.
I trade a lot, but even for my 78-year-old mom, I keep some of her money in miners. Note that I said "some."
Also note that trading out at highs and in at lows does not mean trading even 1/2 of one's position(s).