Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2014, 04:10 PM
 
107,080 posts, read 109,388,270 times
Reputation: 80454

Advertisements

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2014, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Saint Johns, FL
2,345 posts, read 2,701,450 times
Reputation: 2530
Quote:
Originally Posted by fumbling View Post
Actually most equity dividends in my experience are qualified dividends which are taxed at a 15% rate (could be going up to 20%?) so that is the lowest tax rate possible other than tax free muni income.
Actually, fumbling... If you are in the 15% bracket either because your income is simply below the level, or you've managed to put most of your investments into Roth accounts, then qualified dividend income in "taxable" accounts are free from taxation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2014, 07:36 PM
 
2,294 posts, read 2,785,723 times
Reputation: 3852
People that think dividends increase value are typically the same ones who think stock splits increase value. All it does is shift the numbers around and possibly let in some new investors at a lower price point. From an overall financial stand point, there is nothing gained from being paid a dividend that you couldn't have obtained by just selling off a similar percentage of your stock in the company. The only reason it would matter at all is you can't necessarily sell off 3% of your shares if you only one 1 share of a high price stock. Financially, it's the same.

The companies that have been paying dividends for decades and still going up in value? They would have gone up even more in value if they weren't reducing their share price every quarter. For an obvious example, look at the REITs. They typically stay in a very narrow range because of their dividends. If a company with a share price of $15 is paying $2.50 a year in dividends, there's no way it's share price will go up substantially. At the same time, if they didn't have to pay that out, they could have had their share price go up $2.50 a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2014, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Saint Johns, FL
2,345 posts, read 2,701,450 times
Reputation: 2530
Hey Jeo.... did you read the other 40 times someone said that in this thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2014, 09:53 PM
 
2,189 posts, read 2,612,183 times
Reputation: 3736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowexpectations View Post
And after all that it's only total return that matters
Yes but some people like to use part of that total return on a regular no-hassle periodic basis, not keep it unrealized until they die, okay?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2014, 09:58 PM
 
2,189 posts, read 2,612,183 times
Reputation: 3736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newporttom View Post
Actually, fumbling... If you are in the 15% bracket either because your income is simply below the level, or you've managed to put most of your investments into Roth accounts, then qualified dividend income in "taxable" accounts are free from taxation.
Wow I didn't know that and thanks for the info even though I don't think I'll ever be in the 15% bracket since I never put money into Roths but that's good for people to know and better than any LT capital gain on total return investing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2014, 11:28 PM
 
Location: The Pacific NW.
879 posts, read 1,965,830 times
Reputation: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by fumbling View Post
...that's good for people to know and better than any LT capital gain on total return investing.
Well, no it's not. LT capital gains are taxed at 0% for those in the 15% and lower brackets too.

Last edited by LongArm; 08-11-2014 at 11:57 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2014, 01:55 AM
 
2,189 posts, read 2,612,183 times
Reputation: 3736
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongArm View Post
Well, no it's not. LT capital gains are taxed at 0% for those in the 15% and lower brackets too.
Another new thing I learned!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2014, 02:17 AM
 
107,080 posts, read 109,388,270 times
Reputation: 80454
a couple can earn almost 100k and after just standard deductons and exemptions be in the 15% tax bracket and pay zero capital gains taxes.

This why folks blow it most of the time by filling up their tax deferred accounts with equities. Equities belong in either a roth or taxable account.

Income generating stuff belongs in tax deferred accounts since taxes are the same regardless.

Last edited by mathjak107; 08-12-2014 at 03:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2014, 03:53 AM
 
107,080 posts, read 109,388,270 times
Reputation: 80454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeo123 View Post
People that think dividends increase value are typically the same ones who think stock splits increase value. All it does is shift the numbers around and possibly let in some new investors at a lower price point. From an overall financial stand point, there is nothing gained from being paid a dividend that you couldn't have obtained by just selling off a similar percentage of your stock in the company. The only reason it would matter at all is you can't necessarily sell off 3% of your shares if you only one 1 share of a high price stock. Financially, it's the same.

The companies that have been paying dividends for decades and still going up in value? They would have gone up even more in value if they weren't reducing their share price every quarter. For an obvious example, look at the REITs. They typically stay in a very narrow range because of their dividends. If a company with a share price of $15 is paying $2.50 a year in dividends, there's no way it's share price will go up substantially. At the same time, if they didn't have to pay that out, they could have had their share price go up $2.50 a year.
In theory yes but markets are going to take things wherever they go over a quarter. Sometimes they will retrace the payout and cover it ,sometimes they won't.

All that is important is the combination of the two which is your total return.
Your net worth couldn't care less how it is arrived at .

Studies show that the biggest bang for the buck will be in reinvesting dividends while spending down cash and bonds first giving stocks and reinvested dividends plenty of compounding time.

Spending dividends up front first cuts your bang for the buck over time as opposed to drawing your income stream from bonds and cash first and leaving higher compounding on the equities..

Last edited by mathjak107; 08-12-2014 at 04:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top