Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2014, 06:53 PM
 
Location: San Jose
574 posts, read 696,690 times
Reputation: 732

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
You need to measure your performance against what you could get by simply buying an S&P 500 Index fund. Also, how long have you been "successful" day trading? If you don't have at least a 5 year track record, then you don't have enough to go on, and I really don't even think 5 years is enough data.
Very true. I would say you need at least 20 years of data beating the S&P 500 after taxes and trading fees to be considered a reliable day trader. Anything less is more likely to be dumb luck. Boring index funds FTW!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2014, 09:57 PM
 
Location: The Pacific NW.
879 posts, read 1,962,032 times
Reputation: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by RecentGrad1 View Post
Very true. I would say you need at least 20 years of data beating the S&P 500 after taxes and trading fees to be considered a reliable day trader. Anything less is more likely to be dumb luck.
You guys are way off on this point. You do realize that DAY TRADING means buying and selling the same stock on the same day, right? A typical day trader does maybe 3 or 4 of these round-trip trades each day. That's about 750 to 1000 trades each year, 3750 to 5000 trades after 5 years, 15,000 to 20,000 trades after 20 years. LOL, you think it takes at least 15,000 to 20,000 trades (20 years) to prove that one's successful trading methodology is not a fluke??? Or even 5000 trades (5 years)? That's nutty.

BTW, trading INTRA-DAY, like day traders do, has little to do with the LONG-TERM direction of the market, so a successful DAY TRADING record for a year in which the market went up isn't necessarily "confusing genius with a bull market." If it were, you wouldn't have so many (bad) day traders LOSING money in a bull market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Wartrace,TN
8,051 posts, read 12,761,708 times
Reputation: 16479
90% of the people that attempt to day trade lose. I believe this statistic is somewhat misleading due to the ease of entry into the business. All you need is some trading capital and a dream to start. A lot of people view trading as "easy money"; all they have to do is buy/sell when their "extra special technical indicator" flashes a signal. Throw in a little bit of greed and fear. Add a dash of ego. A recipe for failure.

Look at all the charlatan's out there on the internet selling "trading systems"; there must be thousands of them. These "systems developers" wouldn't bother advertising if the rubes didn't bite and buy. I ask you, if any trading system was successful why would the creator sell it to other traders? Why wouldn't they trade it themselves?

Even if a person educates themselves there seems to be a lot of advice to use technical indicators. While some of the indicators are useful as decision support tools they are all lagging price. They are great if you want to see what happened in the past. Professional traders KNOW you are using these indicators and will use them against you.

Lets say you do find a trading plan that is consistent in back testing. Many people do not follow their plan due to psychological pressures. The fear and greed take over and the plan goes out the window. "I know I should puke it out but it's going to come back" or " I am going to hold on even though it has reached my target price, I am going to get rich!"

Another downfall for the 90% is poor money management. Nobody is going to be right 100% of the time and in fact if you are right over 50% of the time you are doing well. You need to limit your exposure on each trade to 2% or less of your trading capital. A lot of aspiring traders start trading undercapitalized leaving little room for error.

This is just a short list of the challenges. People have written books on the subject. It is no wonder why the failure rate is so high. People don't look at markets like they should. It is nothing but a two way auction based on the participants perception of value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 09:46 AM
 
Location: The Pacific NW.
879 posts, read 1,962,032 times
Reputation: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wartrace View Post
90% of the people that attempt to day trade lose. I believe this statistic is somewhat misleading due to the ease of entry into the business. All you need is some trading capital and a dream to start.
Yep. In my estimation, at least half of those taking up day trading take it as seriously as a trip to the casino--and put just as much work/study into it. Based on that fact alone, the high failure rate shouldn't surprise anyone.

Make no mistake about it, day trading is generally difficult to do successfully, even for those who take it seriously and put in the work. Wartrace mentioned a few of the reasons why. But it absolutely can be done, and done very well compared to market returns/volatility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,808 posts, read 24,880,628 times
Reputation: 28479
I don't want to spend a ton of time defending my strategy. I simply buy the index I prefer, and try to catch the intraday swings. For example, when I feel like trading the S&P500, I use SDS and SH to short, and SPXL and SPY to catch upside. I trade different indexes, but mostly the s&p over the past year. I try to catch both the upward and downward momentum, while also using these inverse ETFs as insurance against potential loss against one another.

I don't know if that makes sense, but it doesn't have to. I don't want to convince anyone that what I do can be replicated. It's very risky if not executed properly. I use a fair bit of math and number crunching to pick my preferred entry point during the day. It's been making me exceptional returns, but it's admittedly a very stressful way to go about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Wartrace,TN
8,051 posts, read 12,761,708 times
Reputation: 16479
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
I don't want to spend a ton of time defending my strategy. I simply buy the index I prefer, and try to catch the intraday swings. For example, when I feel like trading the S&P500, I use SDS and SH to short, and SPXL and SPY to catch upside. I trade different indexes, but mostly the s&p over the past year. I try to catch both the upward and downward momentum, while also using these inverse ETFs as insurance against potential loss against one another.

I don't know if that makes sense, but it doesn't have to. I don't want to convince anyone that what I do can be replicated. It's very risky if not executed properly. I use a fair bit of math and number crunching to pick my preferred entry point during the day. It's been making me exceptional returns, but it's admittedly a very stressful way to go about it.
I hope you didn't read my post as an attack on day trading Andy; I was attempting to explain WHY day trading has such a dismal success rate in general. I love the analogy that Longarm made of it being like a casino.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-05-2014, 09:34 PM
 
24,396 posts, read 26,932,004 times
Reputation: 19962
I always say stick to whatever you are good at... if you aren't good at one thing, that doesn't mean your neighbor won't be good at it too. With that being said, it's always good to remain humble and remind yourself there is still a lot to learn. The market has been in an uptrend since 2009, so it's very easy to make money with ANY strategy. I personally do a mix of trading and investing. This is what works for me. I mainly use moving averages, stochastics, volume and chart patterns. I'm not a day trader, but I actively trade. However, I also have long term positions as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 09:05 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
27,549 posts, read 28,630,498 times
Reputation: 25118
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
If your good enough at it though, is there any reason to stop?
As mentioned by other posters, no. Do what works for you. Everyone has their niche. It's that simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
5,874 posts, read 6,940,842 times
Reputation: 10277
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongArm View Post
Yep. In my estimation, at least half of those taking up day trading take it as seriously as a trip to the casino--and put just as much work/study into it. Based on that fact alone, the high failure rate shouldn't surprise anyone.

Make no mistake about it, day trading is generally difficult to do successfully, even for those who take it seriously and put in the work. Wartrace mentioned a few of the reasons why. But it absolutely can be done, and done very well compared to market returns/volatility.
I view it as continuously going to the casino. You may do well in the short-term or for the first few trips, but in the long run (years), the odds favor the casino and they will get their money back (and more). The fees and taxes make it very difficult to be a successful day trader in the long run. Are there any mulit-billionaires that made their fortune through day trading?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2014, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Wartrace,TN
8,051 posts, read 12,761,708 times
Reputation: 16479
Quote:
Originally Posted by don6170 View Post
I view it as continuously going to the casino. You may do well in the short-term or for the first few trips, but in the long run (years), the odds favor the casino and they will get their money back (and more). The fees and taxes make it very difficult to be a successful day trader in the long run. Are there any mulit-billionaires that made their fortune through day trading?
John Arnold. John D. Arnold - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marc Rich. Marc Rich - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The taxes on futures trading are much lower than stock trading or wage income due to the section 1256 rule that taxes all futures contracts as 60% LT capital gains and 40% short term.

Fees? 4 dollars a round trip per contract is not excessive.

As far as it being a casino; it is only a casino if you treat it like one. Most traders are not looking to become billionaires, they do it for income. A lot of people made a good living trading at the CBOT as floor traders before the move to electronic trading.

Last edited by Wartrace; 10-06-2014 at 11:10 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top