Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerChicago
Now I'm curious.
|
Then I'll humor you.
1. Why would you even bring up his accent? He's a Norwegian. He should have an accent as someone who allegedly only recently entered the U.S for a winter break. A "Friend" would not even bring this up first thing. No reasonable person would bring this up unless they were attempting to defend the idea that they should be in "America" and act "American".
2. According to your timeline, he entered the U.S. in Winter of 2010 in a "gap year". Norwegians have a "gap year" at the age of 19, when they graduate their secondary schooling. And although it's not law that he attend secondary "primary" school, in practice, all Norwegian kids do because otherwise they'd be done with school at 16 and the country would not have any college graduates. Which reasonably made him 19 or 20.
3. If he were in college, he'd have to be back in Norway by early January. The first week in fact. You said they met after New Year. So... if he's on a "gap year" then he wasn't in college and had no need to immediately return home.
If I've already established that he's 19 or 20 in his "gap year", your comment "He didn't end up finishing his degree but that's irrelevant, I guess" is extremely relevant because he was "able to come to Chicago again for a month and a half in the summer of 2011". Which means he never attended college period. How do I know? Because his "gap year" would mean he would have taken the whole year off. Fall and Spring, and if he's not in Norway in time for the Spring semester (which starts in very early January, which he could not attend because he was still in the U.S. at that time), then he didn't attend college that year. And since the gap year is the time between post secondary primary school and your first year of college, he did not attend college at all.
And if he couldn't afford college in the U.S. and I've shown that it was impossible for him to attend college in Norway, then he did not attend college. Which means he can't stay in the U.S. as a "student".
4. They had gotten hastily hitched and no one knew. You choose this route when you know you're misbehaving and making a mistake. The green card hunter fears her family will discover what's going on and try to stop it. Vegas wouldn't exist if it wasn't for mistakes of this nature.
They married in June. He was in the U.S. in January and in less than 5 months he's back and married and no one knows. Not even you, although you claim the female was telling you about how she was pining away for this guy. Yet she doesn't tell you she got married? That makes no sense.
5. "And Chicago was becoming a second home to the guy." In two visits? One visit in the winter and one in the summer? I think not. I've moved around plenty in my life time and have never made a city a "second home" in under 6 months and neither has any other reasonable person who has no family or attachment to a city with a culture unlike anything they're accustomed to.
It's more likely he has been to the U.S. quite a bit as an exchange visitor. Hence his ability to speak English with a minimal accent and proper use of American colloquialisms. Usually the male green card hunters are lifeguards and camp counselors for two summers before they find their "soul mate".
6. You refer to this person as though he's your best friend and not the husband of another friend. You claim that he's now your friend. Yet it's his wife who called you to keep you abreast of her preoccupation with this man and complain about the marriage falling apart. This would indicate that you are indeed her friend under normal circumstances because females generally only give this type of information to their closest friends.
Not only that, but you've backflipped on your female friend. You've gone from being her friend to accusing her of being morbid and really changing.
7. "So let's say he becomes a citizen and divorces her afterwards? Would this cause problems? What if he renounces his Norwegian citizenship, only has the American, and then gets a divorce? Will immigration officials look into the case if there's too small a time gap between becoming a US citizen and divorcing? Would they strip him of the citizenship even if that's the only one he has? What would happen?"
This is a classic rambling question posted by someone who is in a relationship for one purpose and desperate to know if they have a shot at succeeding. People who marry for love aren't concerned about "staying" or obtaining citizenship. And they certainly are not thinking of ways to renounce their citizenship in their home country.
8. It is now January 2013. If he was 19 or 20 at his 2010 winter break, then he's now 22 or 23 and the female is about 25. Age gaps aren't that important for the most part, but when you're 19 or 20 and the female is 21 or 22, it actually is a larger gap than a 50 year old man and a 35 year old female in terms of personal development and maturity.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not going to keep analyzing your post line by line and discrepancy by discrepancy. I don't buy your story. I've given sufficient examples of why I don't buy it and why I don't believe any ISO worth their weight in salt would buy it either. The best possible outcome for you/your friend is to hope the ISO looks the other way because they have bigger fish to fry.
The bottom line is this:
Your "friend" is now a bum. He's not a college drop out, he's an uneducated service worker. And he has no means to immigrate to the U.S. except through marriage. He can't do anything in Norway because they make people go to college and contribute to society in a meaningful way. Where as in America you can earn a living just by applying for a job without any education. Hence being a 25 year old without any education "managing" a clothing store.
I'd be depressed and "morbid" if I was your female friend too. She got duped and probably feels about as sexy as a wrench does to a mechanic.
The female hasn't "changed". This is just what all green card hunters claim and hope they don't get called in for an interview. The only thing more classic than "she's changed" is if he accuses her of cheating/dancing/making out with another man, a year and a half into the marriage. At that point, he gets all worked up and she's guilted into signing the papers to remove the conditions on his residency thinking he'll stay. He'll hang out for another year, obtain citizenship based on that same marriage and then divorce her 3 months after obtaining that certificate. He'll tell her he forgives her and she was wonderful but he just can't get over her dancing with another man. He's "lost passion".
He'll then petition for his high school sweetheart who just happened to vacation in Chicago during his last year of marriage and she'll give birth to his child within 6 months of the divorce being finalized and his obtaining the certificate. His current wife will never know.
I'm not going to keep picking apart the original post. You're either the immigrant or your the immigrant's high school girlfriend debating on how to best proceed and trying to determine if you need to marry a citizen yourself as a backup plan.
This isn't just my "suspicions".
This is based on experience.
And each time you post, it confirms my "suspicions".
All that being said...
If the OP is actually "just a friend of a friend who became a friend" and a disinterested party (the odds being about 5 in 100), I would have to say that you've been duped every bit as much as your female friend. Your Norwegian pal is priming you to submit affidavits in support of his petition to remove the conditions on his marriage. You've probably already met his Norwegian high school sweetheart but chalked it up to her being just his "bff" or "roommate" or "friend of a roommate".
The only reasonable thing for a person in his age and situation to do would be to return home to his/your parents. But he/you won't. Because he/you entered the U.S. with the intent to immigrate from the get go. Green card hunters have nothing to gain by leaving and everything to gain by staying.