Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-13-2010, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,391,849 times
Reputation: 1802

Advertisements

Waters is well-liked in Los Angeles and will get re-elected as long as she wants to run. However, there are ethic charges that she and her husband benefited from some bank deal and that has not been cleared up. But Waters is pretty old and her days in political office are probably coming to an end within the next few years in my opinion. Waters is a reliable liberal and very progressive. Her district votes almost totally Democratic and any other liberal would do well so whoever follows Waters will likely vote exactly as she has all these years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2010, 10:38 AM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,455,391 times
Reputation: 7586
She's the biggest fruitcake in Congress. Sounds like a good fit. I'd love to watch from a safe distance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
155 posts, read 252,716 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike121 View Post
One of the tough problems for Ms Waters as a candidate is the nature of her coalition. For a long time in California she's worked hard to build a strong coalition of African-American elected officials. This has been a crucial job: because blacks have been under-represented in government, and she's help bring up some good people. If it weren't for people like here, there might not be any blacks in local politics at all.

But the old black powerbase is fading away: African Americans (like whites) have been fleeing both the city of LA and the state of California.

She hasn't done enough to promote herself outside her base, and she isn't seen as one who pays attention to people outside her base.
You beat me to it. This is absolutely true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,391,849 times
Reputation: 1802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike121 View Post
One of the tough problems for Ms Waters as a candidate is the nature of her coalition. For a long time in California she's worked hard to build a strong coalition of African-American elected officials. This has been a crucial job: because blacks have been under-represented in government, and she's help bring up some good people. If it weren't for people like here, there might not be any blacks in local politics at all.

But the old black powerbase is fading away: African Americans (like whites) have been fleeing both the city of LA and the state of California.

She hasn't done enough to promote herself outside her base, and she isn't seen as one who pays attention to people outside her base.
Waters district is more Latino than Afro-American.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 11:36 PM
 
3,393 posts, read 5,280,058 times
Reputation: 3031
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluenoter View Post
Maxine Waters, if she were governor, would put California back where it belongs. She seems has a plan to get the economy moving, helping consumers, and ending global warming.
Negative. CA needs somebody like Reagan, minus his amnesty programs, or Bill Clinton, minus NAFTA. Bill, if you're reading this, come to California and be our Governor!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 11:43 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,391,849 times
Reputation: 1802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay100 View Post
Negative. CA needs somebody like Reagan, minus his amnesty programs, or Bill Clinton, minus NAFTA.
Today's Republican party would never vote for someone like Ronald Reagan; he would be considered too liberal for them. That's how far the GOP has moved toward the loony right-wing Tea baggers!

Today's GOP could snub even Reagan - Los Angeles Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2010, 11:56 PM
 
3,393 posts, read 5,280,058 times
Reputation: 3031
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Today's Republican party would never vote for someone like Ronald Reagan; he would be considered too liberal for them. That's how far the GOP has moved toward the loony right-wing Tea baggers!

Today's GOP could snub even Reagan - Los Angeles Times
Both extremes are basically looney. I just like the fact that the USA was strong under Reagan. Oh well it's not going to happen anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 02:32 AM
 
2,245 posts, read 4,233,106 times
Reputation: 2155
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluenoter View Post
Maxine Waters, if she were governor, would put California back where it belongs. She seems has a plan to get the economy moving, helping consumers, and ending global warming.
Yes, I'm sure she does. However, what we need are plans that are actually effective. And, given Waters cannot seem to manage much of anything correctly as she has a remarkably poor acumen for understanding the causes of problems, it's unlikely any plan of hers would be good for much, other than encouraging people of color to hate White people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 06:31 AM
 
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
6,588 posts, read 17,552,477 times
Reputation: 9463
I'm also liberal, and I'd move out of California if Ms. Waters became governor!

She was on the wrong side of the debate about King Drew Medical Center, for one thing. Does anyone else remember that series of harrowing articles in the L.A. Times about that hospital, and how poorly run it was? How could she want to keep it open after that?

Let's hope the OP's post was tongue in cheek.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2010, 09:54 AM
 
672 posts, read 2,175,874 times
Reputation: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
Waters district is more Latino than Afro-American.
True, but, how many of those Latinos actually vote when compared to the African American population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top