Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2014, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Dana Point
1,224 posts, read 1,824,906 times
Reputation: 683

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thelopez2 View Post
Because Lincoln can handle so much more capacity.


When it's done, it will only take 45 minutes to go to the grocery store instead of the current 30.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2014, 05:40 PM
 
1,319 posts, read 2,197,631 times
Reputation: 651
Weren't they talking about adding either a street or more direct walkable paths to help alleviate congestion in MDR?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2014, 07:22 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
73 posts, read 147,407 times
Reputation: 142
I lived in MDR from 2001 to 2007, on Tahiti Way. It was the best time of my life. I was poor, paid half my salary on rent and lived on the other half, but somehow that didn't matter. I thought it was paradise. It was beginning to change in the mid 2000's when a proposed multi use complex, including a Traders Joe's was in the plan. A couple of the restaurants along Admiralty were already closed. It seems like most of the places I frequented are gone, Souplantation, LA Fitness, AMC. I used to frequent a Family restaurant in the "Pavillion" shopping area, I think it was right behind a bagel shop, it was very nice and reasonable. I bought my stereo receiver from Goodguys and used to frequent Tower Records and Barnes and Noble, all in the same vicinity. I used a shortcut to access the beach in between buildings, and was on the beach within a 5 minute walk. I loved it when I slept with my porch sliding door open, and I could hear the waves crashing. I recently was watching All The President's Men, and to my surprise, Robert Redford's apartment was in my building, and it was a replica of my place. It was neat to see how it looked in the 70's when it was first build (dark walnut kitchen cabinets, and yellow oven). Thanks for the memories!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2014, 03:10 AM
 
1,927 posts, read 1,901,966 times
Reputation: 4760
Quote:
Originally Posted by John23 View Post
I still can't believe the new santa monica place, what a contrast to the old one.
I hate the new Santa Monica Place. I often visited the Old, but have only been twice to the New. The Old had character, good basic eateries, and simple stores with stuff I might wish to buy. The New is mostly high-end clothes boutiques.

And what's with the open sky? An indoor mall has air-conditioning and shade against hot, sunny days, and it's dry on the fewer rainy days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2014, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
2,054 posts, read 2,569,088 times
Reputation: 3558
I visited the new Santa Monica Place back in October, with my wife, just because we don't like living in Alabama anymore. It was pretty nice, but at our age, not too much just blows us away. I just really like the surrounding environment better, and generally like Santa Monica a lot, because we love the beach. I envy those of you who live there now. I also hope it doesn't price completely out of sight before I can relocate!
Sorry! I know you all don't need any more people! But it's beautiful!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2014, 08:44 PM
 
25,556 posts, read 23,980,472 times
Reputation: 10120
MDR is one of the nicest parts of Los Angeles. I love it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2014, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
2,883 posts, read 5,892,164 times
Reputation: 2762
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
Apparently they're going to level Fisherman's Village in MDR to make it more "relevant": Dated Marina del Rey to get a modern makeover - latimes.com
I think there is a fine line between "modernizing" and saving things from the past. I hope they don't completely bulldoze fisherman's village.

Why not keep some of the tahitian theme, and modernize some of it. The center on admiralty, fiji and lincoln is pretty classy. Some shopping complexes end up way too sleek. There's no character. I hope they don't do that to fisherman's village.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2014, 08:37 PM
 
Location: Coastal L.A.
513 posts, read 914,103 times
Reputation: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinema Cat View Post
I hate the new Santa Monica Place. I often visited the Old, but have only been twice to the New. The Old had character, good basic eateries, and simple stores with stuff I might wish to buy. The New is mostly high-end clothes boutiques.

And what's with the open sky? An indoor mall has air-conditioning and shade against hot, sunny days, and it's dry on the fewer rainy days.
NO. The old SM Place needed to go. It was old, it was done, it had its run. The new one is beautiful. The open sky? It's because we have fantastic weather most of the year in L.A and we want to take advantage of that. Duh.

The old one had character? just because something is "old" doesn't mean it has "character". Some things are just that...OLD, and need to be replaced with newer, more contemporary and better things.

It's a much better mall. It looks great. I'm sorry that you feel out of place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2014, 12:50 AM
 
1,319 posts, read 2,197,631 times
Reputation: 651
Not a fan of the new mall either. Offers nothing interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2014, 01:10 AM
 
Location: El Sereno, Los Angeles, CA
733 posts, read 940,227 times
Reputation: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by NyWriterdude View Post
I think the major difference is the nice areas of Los Angeles tend to just have well off people. In Manhattan, you have luxury housing right next to the housing projects. One block can be ghetto, and a few blocks over you can have Whole Foods.

LA dumps its homeless and welfare motel facilities downtown and in South Central disproportionately, while NYC has stuff like that even in the Upper West Side (a lot of wealthy Manhattan neighborhoods have housing projects where residents pay 400 dollars a month to live there).
Oh in LA we still got our ghettos sprinkled throughout....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top