Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2015, 05:32 PM
 
Location: West Los Angeles and Rancho Palos Verdes
13,583 posts, read 15,667,720 times
Reputation: 14049

Advertisements

Quote:
A majority of Los Angeles County voters are in favor of raising the minimum hourly wage to $15.25 and requiring employers to offer paid sick leave, according to a poll released today.

The poll was commissioned by the Raise the Wage campaign, whose members are urging the Los Angeles City Council to approve a minimum wage hike package.
Poll: Most People Want County's Minimum Wage at $15.25 | Brentwood, CA Patch

Why stop at $15.25? Let's make it $50 and hour, and with all the other entitlements many people in transitional jobs get (thanks to the tax paying middle class), let's see just how much more quickly the middle income tax base leaves, so we'll have a two tier economic system consisting of peasants at the bottom and Bolsheviks at the top.

Welcome to the post-American America, not your grandfather's America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2015, 06:14 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,741 posts, read 16,361,136 times
Reputation: 19831
If you think you'd prefer my grandfather's America, farming rock and stump Minnesota land in those winters with no indoor plumbing or central heating or electricity, there are still places in the world you can go enjoy such.

And with a mere 85 people in the world holding as much wealth as 50% of the population, I think $50 an hour might be doable - and would actually result in a far more robust economy for all who like consumer lifestyles.

If you are concerned with the middle class, you'd better consider where all their money is disappearing. Hint: check under the mattresses of those 85 wealthiest. Because steadily, much of that middle class will be earning less than that $15 hourly minimum wage. And the whole machine will start grinding to a halt because: where'd all the money go to support the economy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2015, 06:37 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
1,235 posts, read 1,770,349 times
Reputation: 1558
Yeah, hell my grandfather came of age in the Great Depression...we could use a man like Herbert Hoover again.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1F9vRVyV914
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2015, 06:58 PM
 
4,213 posts, read 8,309,577 times
Reputation: 2680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exitus Acta Probat View Post
Poll: Most People Want County's Minimum Wage at $15.25 | Brentwood, CA Patch

Why stop at $15.25? Let's make it $50 and hour, and with all the other entitlements many people in transitional jobs get (thanks to the tax paying middle class), let's see just how much more quickly the middle income tax base leaves, so we'll have a two tier economic system consisting of peasants at the bottom and Bolsheviks at the top.

Welcome to the post-American America, not your grandfather's America.
Sounds great. I look forward to $10 big macs and $15 subway foot longs.

The income inequality in LA county is a big problem. Wages haven't kept up with cost of living. But forcing the minimum wage up will only lead to inflation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2015, 07:39 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,741 posts, read 16,361,136 times
Reputation: 19831
Quote:
Originally Posted by disgruntled la native View Post
Sounds great. I look forward to $10 big macs and $15 subway foot longs.

The income inequality in LA county is a big problem. Wages haven't kept up with cost of living. But forcing the minimum wage up will only lead to inflation.
In case you haven't noticed, inflation happens as part of a healthy fractional reserve banking economy such as we, and the entire world now runs on. There hasn't been runaway inflation since, well, practically about forever in the US or other leading economic powerhouse nations. There has, however, been a steadily severe rise in income inequality over the past two + decades. Which income inequality is killing the middle class - which IS turning us toward neo-feudalism. And no, that is not too strong a term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2015, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
8,558 posts, read 10,984,238 times
Reputation: 10813
The one important thing(at least to seniors) is no one touting a raise in the minimum wage has uttered one word as to how it would effect those living on a fixed income.
Everyone except seniors would be getting a raise in pay, which would be offset by higher prices for all goods and services.

This rise in the cost of these things will hit everyone, but because seniors were not a part of the hike in payroll, they will still get stuck paying more for everything.
The cost of living increase seniors get in January every year, doesn't come close to the rise in inflation, so those of you thinking seniors are right up there with the rest of the population when it comes to income, are flat out wrong.

I have approach every city, and county representative on this issue, and not one response.
Seniors are not even considered when it comes to how a rise in the minimum wage will affect them.

Bob.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2015, 08:19 PM
 
14,317 posts, read 11,714,153 times
Reputation: 39160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
And with a mere 85 people in the world holding as much wealth as 50% of the population, I think $50 an hour might be doable - and would actually result in a far more robust economy for all who like consumer lifestyles.
Figure out a legal and moral way to get the money away from those 85 people, and then we can talk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2015, 08:24 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,741 posts, read 16,361,136 times
Reputation: 19831
Quote:
Originally Posted by saibot View Post
Figure out a legal and moral way to get the money away from those 85 people, and then we can talk.
"Legal and moral"? Like how they acquired it through engineering the system? Right.

Well, you can start by increasing the minimum wage. Legal. And moral.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2015, 08:32 PM
 
14,317 posts, read 11,714,153 times
Reputation: 39160
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
"Legal and moral"? Like how they acquired it through engineering the system? Right.

Well, you can start by increasing the minimum wage. Legal. And moral.
That would be great if the people paying the increased wages were the top 0.0000001%. But what you're suggesting is taking a lot more money away from mostly middle- to upper-middle class folks who then have no choice but to let employees go and/or raise prices for their goods and services. Or, in the worst case, to close their businesses.

My husband owns a small business, so we have personal experience with the cost involved in hiring employees. It's bad enough; you want to make it worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2015, 09:30 PM
 
Location: On the water.
21,741 posts, read 16,361,136 times
Reputation: 19831
Quote:
Originally Posted by saibot View Post
That would be great if the people paying the increased wages were the top 0.0000001%. But what you're suggesting is taking a lot more money away from mostly middle- to upper-middle class folks who then have no choice but to let employees go and/or raise prices for their goods and services. Or, in the worst case, to close their businesses.

My husband owns a small business, so we have personal experience with the cost involved in hiring employees. It's bad enough; you want to make it worse.
Funny. Smart businesses don't carry expendable employees. If you can "let employees go" and still remain in business, then you're better off without them. That's what the big boys do. You adjust pricing and find all other efficiencies,

Anyway, we're talking minimum wage here. Do you pay your employees only minimum wage now? This change would mostly affect certain segments of specific industries and services that have substantial percentages of their workers being paid minimum. Large companies like that are generally rolling in dough if they are surviving at all.

If you have a small company with say, 15 employees and five of them are minimum wage, raising those five probably affects your payroll expense by less than 15%. Considering that payroll is only one of many expenses, change in your total costs could range down as low as a few percent. Don't have to change pricing much to cover that.

Disclosure: I ran my own printing / graphics business for more than half of my more than working 50 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top