The Los Angeles Homeless Containment Thread (calculation, cost of, relocation)

[CA4Now]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

As a landlord who actually owns rental property (have you managed a rental?), that would cover 90% of most non-problem evictions.

Sure have. But why would anyone expect you to have the same experience as any other landlord in southern CA?

[Tulemutt]

Originally Posted by SportyandMisty

I get your point, and my post was partly in jest. My real point is that incentives matter. It is also quite hard to design incentives such that they don't accidentally promote unintended consequences.

Yeah, I know you were poking the rabbit ... and there's a ton of truth to the power of incentives ... like your challenge to legislators

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by CA4Now

With his expertise, he moves into another area. Or if he doesn't do his job, he's out. That IS the real world.

https://www.lahsa.org/leadership

How will his performance be evaluated?

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by CA4Now

Sure have. But why would anyone expect you to have the same experience as any other landlord in southern CA?

Uh because there's a reason the guidelines were setup that way. California is an extremely RENTER friendly state, and you think the guidelines would be setup to NOT protect renters in the majority of cases?

[Tulemutt]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

As a landlord who actually owns rental property (have you managed a rental?), that would cover 90% of most non-problem evictions.

Yeah. And what total % of evictions are those covered vs “problem evictions”?

In other words, your comment is just another opportunity for you to be contentious rather than contributory with purpose.

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by Tulemutt

Yeah. And what total % of evictions are those covered vs “problem evictions”?

In other words, your comment is just another opportunity for you to be contentious rather than contributory with purpose.

Why should "problem evictions" be covered at all?

If someone is going to be a ****up, there should be consequences. That's how the real world works.

[Tulemutt]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

"By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return." - The Boss of Pope John Paul III

And you thus suggest by extension that the “big boss” meant no exception for those of his deepest imperfect creation ... such as the disabled and deformed and mentally incomplete?

[CA4Now]

Originally Posted by CaliRestoration

How will his performance be evaluated?

I'm sure that his performance is fairly well scrutinized.

http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/...isc_6-8-16.pdf

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by CA4Now

I'm sure that his performance is fairly well scrutinized.

http://clkrep.lacity.org/onlinedocs/...isc_6-8-16.pdf

So how many of those projects does he have to complete to be "successful". If he misses half the goals, is he going to get fired?

What if he hits all the goals and homelessness increases (like it has for the past 10 years)? Is that still a success?

[CaliRestoration]

Originally Posted by Tulemutt

And you thus suggest by extension that the “big boss” meant no exception for those of his deepest imperfect creation ... such as the disabled and deformed and mentally incomplete?

How many of those people are mentally and physically "incomplete"? Like give me a percentage based on some data.