Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-09-2018, 06:09 AM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,920,304 times
Reputation: 4528

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by robr2 View Post
Burlington is now the place where wanna be Lexingtonians now buy because the $800K 3 BR Cape with the pink bathrooms just doesn't make sense. Those $400K ranches are the tear down targets. Closer to $500K is where people can just squeak into town and if they are willing to spend $470K for a 3 BR/2 Bath Cape, there are overspending IMHO. That listing is simply greedy.
+1

Burlington hasn’t really been affordable since the recession. Both Bedford and Burlington are the clear beneficiary of the commercial boom in Burlington, and the continued rise in prices in towns like Lexington. Woburn and Billerica are also seeing a large upward swing for the same reasons, though Woburn is no longer a cheap alternative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2018, 06:14 AM
 
23,561 posts, read 18,707,417 times
Reputation: 10824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shrewsburried View Post
Clinton could revitalize purely on the back of it's neighbors - Bolton, Sterling, Boylston all have high median incomes which can support a small and robust main st.
I have a feeling Clinton could take off a little more when people discover how close to 495 much of it actually is (<10 min., no red lights or anything). You are already seeing stuff going on like the lofts at Lancaster Mills, etc. Yes there is the school thing, but Hudson was in the same predicament not long ago (now they are considered very solid).


Saying that, places like Clinton, Ayer, Worcester, Fitchburg, Leominster are what I consider affordable now. Hudson has been expensive for several years now. Framingham is long past that point too, unless you are comparing it with its neighbors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
82 posts, read 77,977 times
Reputation: 118
Tewksbury
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 07:49 AM
 
298 posts, read 341,673 times
Reputation: 364
Default mills?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaseyB View Post
I've been saying Millis for years and I think prices have already risen there.
Just be aware, Millis has some of the very worst roads in this area. A lot of them are minefields. I don't need a town line sign to know when I've crossed into Millis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 11:31 AM
 
6,573 posts, read 6,740,252 times
Reputation: 8793
Quote:
Originally Posted by robr2 View Post
Burlington is now the place where wanna be Lexingtonians now buy because the $800K 3 BR Cape with the pink bathrooms just doesn't make sense. Those $400K ranches are the tear down targets. Closer to $500K is where people can just squeak into town and if they are willing to spend $470K for a 3 BR/2 Bath Cape, there are overspending IMHO. That listing is simply greedy.
Following your real estate link, I see a lot of the new construction is over one million dollars in Burlington....cripes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 11:39 AM
 
349 posts, read 320,987 times
Reputation: 616
I would say Back Bay, especially along Commonweath ave. Defining affordable as providing value with an eye towards long term appreciation. Boston is an excellent city, and Back Bay will continue to set the benchmark of an outstanding combination of location, amenities, and quality construction. Back Bay has been up and coming for over 200 years, and that's where I'd put my money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 11:51 AM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,920,304 times
Reputation: 4528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave Stranger View Post
Following your real estate link, I see a lot of the new construction is over one million dollars in Burlington....cripes.
It's crazy.

In fear of offending anyone in Burlington, I really can't imagine spending $1M+ on a house in the town. I'd say the same thing about Chelmsford or Wakefield. That is just a lot of dough for what I feel to be a very normal, middle class suburb with limited cohesiveness, no real core, and adversely not a ton of large lots with mega benefits that come to mind. At least in Carlisle I can own my 5 acres, enjoy the hills, and walk to get farm fresh eggs from the neighbors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 11:55 AM
 
6,573 posts, read 6,740,252 times
Reputation: 8793
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwj119 View Post
It's crazy.

In fear of offending anyone in Burlington, I really can't imagine spending $1M+ on a house in the town. I'd say the same thing about Chelmsford or Wakefield. That is just a lot of dough for what I feel to be a very normal, middle class suburb with limited cohesiveness, no real core, and adversely not a ton of large lots with mega benefits that come to mind. At least in Carlisle I can own my 5 acres, enjoy the hills, and walk to get farm fresh eggs from the neighbors.
Yup....was not expecting to see that price-point in Burlington on the upper end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 12:10 PM
 
23,561 posts, read 18,707,417 times
Reputation: 10824
Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowstatus View Post
I would say Back Bay, especially along Commonweath ave. Defining affordable as providing value with an eye towards long term appreciation. Boston is an excellent city, and Back Bay will continue to set the benchmark of an outstanding combination of location, amenities, and quality construction. Back Bay has been up and coming for over 200 years, and that's where I'd put my money.
Back Bay affordable, OK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2018, 12:12 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,962,945 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by massnative71 View Post
Back Bay affordable, OK.

Well, does anyone think back bay is going down in price in the next 50 years?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top