Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-21-2019, 06:26 PM
 
864 posts, read 867,433 times
Reputation: 2189

Advertisements

Are recaps or info on Lucas' original ideas for 7,8 and 9 available somewhere? Curious to compare to what Disney did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-21-2019, 07:10 PM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,336,890 times
Reputation: 14004
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFtrEFkt View Post
Because he has no part of the franchise. He sold it. It's not his to direct, and they're not interested (nor is he).
I realize he sold it, that was my entire third sentence!

There's plenty of times people sell their company to another company and stay on as a consultant or even higher. I was just wondering what the terms of the sale were and if there was any talk of Lucas staying on to direct 7, 8 and 9 or was it a mutual agreement he didn't want to direct them and they (Disney) didn't want him to.

It was just a simple question.

Last edited by cjseliga; 12-21-2019 at 07:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2019, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,903,106 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
I realize he sold it, that was my entire third sentence!

There's plenty of times people sell their company to another company and stay on as a consultant or even higher. I was just wondering what the terms of the sale were and if there was any talk of Lucas staying on to direct 7, 8 and 9 or was it a mutual agreement he didn't want to direct them and they (Disney) didn't want him to.

It was just a simple question.
Lucas thought it was in good hands. I contend it still is. People complained about George Lucas running Star Wars too namely for the prequels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2019, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Maine
22,921 posts, read 28,279,449 times
Reputation: 31249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuero View Post
Are recaps or info on Lucas' original ideas for 7,8 and 9 available somewhere? Curious to compare to what Disney did.
There are some youtube videos summarizing them. Also, if you read THE ART OF THE FORCE AWAKENS book, it gives a pretty good summary as well as some concept art they actually did based on Lucas's initial outline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 01:15 AM
 
2,187 posts, read 1,383,127 times
Reputation: 2347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Way Resident View Post
It was bad. Easily the worst Star Wars movie
This.

Uninteresting, predictable, and cliche.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 02:27 AM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,276,391 times
Reputation: 6681
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Lucas thought it was in good hands. I contend it still is. People complained about George Lucas running Star Wars too namely for the prequels.
Sure, but you have to admire a guy who created the original Trilogy 40 years ago with a small team of unknowns and tight budgets, that hasn't been bettered with huge teams, big actors and a few hundred millions of budget.
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The Rules • Infractions & Deletions • Who's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Buckeye, AZ
38,936 posts, read 23,903,106 times
Reputation: 14125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gungnir View Post
Sure, but you have to admire a guy who created the original Trilogy 40 years ago with a small team of unknowns and tight budgets, that hasn't been bettered with huge teams, big actors and a few hundred millions of budget.
Oh I do. And one of the strengths of Star Wars in most films is their ability to find up and coming actors. I mean Natalie Portman and Ewan McGreggor were creating into being stars when they became Padmé and young Obi-Wan. Hayden Christensen was mostly a nobody before becoming teenage Anakin Skywalker. And this continues today where I can tell you most of the movie going audience for a Star Wars film knew who Daisy Ridley, John Boyega, Oscar Issacs and Adam Driver were. Now most can.

Yes the budgets are bigger now but that was also the case with even Empire and Jedi as well as the prequels.

It is just Star Wars fans hate Star Wars movies because they didn't go the way they wanted them. The only thing safe so far is The Mandalorian series on Disney+.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,276,391 times
Reputation: 6681
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Yes the budgets are bigger now but that was also the case with even Empire and Jedi as well as the prequels.

It is just Star Wars fans hate Star Wars movies because they didn't go the way they wanted them. The only thing safe so far is The Mandalorian series on Disney+.
Well, budget wise Jedi was the most expensive of the original trilogy about $42M at the top end, bottom end was $32M, not even the most expensive movie made that year (that would be Superman III). Indeed by Rise of Skywalker Standards, the combined top end budgets for the three movies would have produced 35 minutes of a movie, and even when adjusted for inflation it still only makes a 90 minute movie (not 141 minutes).
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The Rules • Infractions & Deletions • Who's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 11:21 AM
 
8,609 posts, read 5,619,873 times
Reputation: 5116
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
I realize he sold it, that was my entire third sentence!

There's plenty of times people sell their company to another company and stay on as a consultant or even higher. I was just wondering what the terms of the sale were and if there was any talk of Lucas staying on to direct 7, 8 and 9 or was it a mutual agreement he didn't want to direct them and they (Disney) didn't want him to.

It was just a simple question.
You either knew the answer to your own question before you finished typing your post, or you were merely thinking aloud.

Either way, my response covered the post-sale situation clearly in many fewer words.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2019, 11:23 AM
 
8,609 posts, read 5,619,873 times
Reputation: 5116
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Lucas thought it was in good hands. I contend it still is. People complained about George Lucas running Star Wars too namely for the prequels.
Arguable. Once they get out of their fanfic rut, maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Movies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top