Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-11-2016, 08:27 AM
 
4,287 posts, read 10,773,520 times
Reputation: 3811

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert137 View Post
Probably an unfortunate necessity.
This is how I feel. Its really not fair to those who have the pensions as COLA was promised, but it is necessary and apparently legal given the 6-1 ruling.

With COLA not coming back until the funds are 80% funded, the state has a big bargaining chip. There should be another deal worked out to hopefully fix this mess once and for all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-11-2016, 08:44 AM
 
Location: New Jersey/Florida
5,818 posts, read 12,632,212 times
Reputation: 4414
Default There should be another deal worked out to hopefully fix this mess once and for all.

Unfortunately that's the problem. The employees have and always held up their end of the problem but the current administration and prior ones all the way back to Whitman do what they want to and don't hold up their end. Govt. pensions and Social security the employees have the money taken out automatically from the checks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 08:59 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,350 posts, read 16,717,087 times
Reputation: 13394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue biker View Post
"Raise unlimited funds"?????? No the governor has limited municipal budgets increases to 2% if I recall. Any funds raised by debt is voted on either by elected officials or a public question on the general election ballots. The COLA raises were NEGOTIATED by either elected officials or people appointed by elected officials. Generally in a negotiation there is give and take, maybe a raise, day off, or other benefit is given up for some other benefit, either immediate or in the future. An example was the NEGOTIATIONS Gov. Christie made to increase state employees increased contributions to pensions and healthcare benefits with a promise the Gov would increase funding for the pension funds. We see how well that worked out.
2% cap = What a freak joke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 09:06 AM
 
4,287 posts, read 10,773,520 times
Reputation: 3811
Quote:
Originally Posted by JERSEY MAN View Post
Unfortunately that's the problem. The employees have and always held up their end of the problem but the current administration and prior ones all the way back to Whitman do what they want to and don't hold up their end. Govt. pensions and Social security the employees have the money taken out automatically from the checks.
The current scenario is what matters, not what happened 20+ years ago and can not be changed. What you say is true, but ultimately does not matter.

The underfunded pension liability has been a known issue for many years and was inevitably going to come to a head sooner or later. It's not really their responsibility , but the public workers should have insisted that the state adequately fund what they were responsible for when negotiating . Can't sit there and watch a slow motion train wreck for 20+ years and expect nothing to ever come of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Wayne,NJ
1,352 posts, read 1,532,563 times
Reputation: 1833
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
The current scenario is what matters, not what happened 20+ years ago and can not be changed. What you say is true, but ultimately does not matter.

The underfunded pension liability has been a known issue for many years and was inevitably going to come to a head sooner or later. It's not really their responsibility , but the public workers should have insisted that the state adequately fund what they were responsible for when negotiating . Can't sit there and watch a slow motion train wreck for 20+ years and expect nothing to ever come of it.

It did come to a head in 2011, and supposedly a fix was "negotiated", then Christie reneged his end. It seems like a Machiavellian plot to "screw" working people out of their pensions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 09:20 AM
 
Location: New Jersey/Florida
5,818 posts, read 12,632,212 times
Reputation: 4414
Default The current scenario is what matters

We/they thought this in the well publicized bill signing and changes in 2011. My guess is all these govt.(state and feds) sponsored pension plans will come tumbling down at some point. They're only interested in their own hide at the current time. Look at the current election cycle, the candidates would give away their firstborn to get elected. Having govt. handling money is like having a crack head guarding your cocaine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Wayne,NJ
1,352 posts, read 1,532,563 times
Reputation: 1833
First duty of a politician: To get elected.

Second duty of a politician: To get re-elected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 09:29 AM
 
4,287 posts, read 10,773,520 times
Reputation: 3811
Quote:
Originally Posted by JERSEY MAN View Post
We/they thought this in the well publicized bill signing and changes in 2011. My guess is all these govt.(state and feds) sponsored pension plans will come tumbling down at some point. They're only interested in their own hide at the current time. Look at the current election cycle, the candidates would give away their firstborn to get elected. Having govt. handling money is like having a crack head guarding your cocaine.
I think with this ruling the pension system in NJ is now viable. There just needs to be an iron clad constitutional amendment mandating the state pay its share. Perhaps Ain't exchange a deal can be worked out to switch newly hired employees to a hybrid model where they have a less valuable pension, but also offer a 401k with a generous match.

I think it's workable as is, the public workers just need to make sure they fully protect themselves and hold the government accountable to what they say they are gonna do
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Wayne,NJ
1,352 posts, read 1,532,563 times
Reputation: 1833
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiantRutgersfan View Post
I think with this ruling the pension system in NJ is now viable. There just needs to be an iron clad constitutional amendment mandating the state pay its share. Perhaps Ain't exchange a deal can be worked out to switch newly hired employees to a hybrid model where they have a less valuable pension, but also offer a 401k with a generous match.

I think it's workable as is, the public workers just need to make sure they fully protect themselves and hold the government accountable to what they say they are gonna do
In a sense the current pension is like a 401k with a match, only the State hasn't kicked in their side of the match. What makes you think they'd "match" a 401k? They'd claim a budget shortfall again and say they'll make it up later. Like they've been doing since Whitman was in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-11-2016, 09:48 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,566 posts, read 17,245,407 times
Reputation: 17615
seems the issue is with the irresponsible, short sighted and untrustworthy legislators that made the deals with the unions.


Sympathy for those workers screwed by the union leaders and legislators.


Local iron workers union pulled health coverage from its members....but not to worry, union leaders were covered by state and national union.


the vagaries of the economy have made long term financial promises nothing more than a scam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top