Quote:
Originally Posted by solibs
People should have the choice to live in a place where you pay a lot of taxes but you get a good return on your investment - or to live in a place where you pay next to nothing in taxes but don't expect much in return.
But people should look at the differences between a high tax state like NJ and a low tax state like Oklahoma:
Murders per 100,000:
OK - 6.1
NJ - 4.4
(note that while the numbers are small that represents a 25% difference)
Rape per 100,000:
OK - 43.1
NJ - 12.1
Infant mortality per 1,000
OK - 8
NJ - 6
Adult literacy rate
OK - 80%
NJ - 99%
Poverty rate
OK - 16%
NJ - 9%
Child poverty rate
OK - 23%
NJ - 12%
|
I agree with you. Lower taxes equals fewer services. Everyone has to decide for themselves what's important. Thankfully, the provety rate and literacy rate doesn't affect us. Our particular town has a VERY low crime rate, a decent income level, and the public school system is fine -- I have a 16 year old daughter in the high school. I know Oklahoma has its problems, but we're very satisfied with our move, and as I said, just about everyone I've met is happy with their life here. The discontents I've met are mostly from California, who are amazed that their low tax bill in OK won't cover the types of services they got in California.
A major consideration for us is higher education. NJ state colleges (Rutgers for example) full year tuition (in state) $13,000 (approximate); University of Central Oklahoma, full year tuition (in state) $4500 (approximate).
Instead of comparing the entire state, we compared our town here in OK to our town in NJ. The services we received in NJ wasn't worth the hefty tax bill we had there. But everyone's situation is different. If I had an autistic child, for example, NJ would be a better choice for us.