Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-20-2013, 02:08 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Pelham Parkway,The Bronx
9,247 posts, read 24,082,631 times
Reputation: 7759

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOkidd View Post
The area is gentrifying fast so make your move before all the affordable spots are gone. Now that MTV has a reality show based there, it is bound to become the next hip area in Manhattan, leaving even less space on the island for poor and middle-class folk. Some people will tell you that west of Broadway is better than east, but in my experiences both sides are perfectly fine - much more stable than neighbourhoods to the south, but be aware that there is a huge drug scene there, and the neighbourhood is home to more than a few big-time traffickers. This is especially true for heroin.
LOl,you sound like a real estate huckster.

I guess it's all a matter of perspective( as in age maybe ?) but I can't imagine anyone thinking Washington Heights is gentrifying "fast". I've been hearing about and reading about this gentrification for at least 10 or 15 years now but really things haven't changed much at all.It's got some decent pockets for sure but most of Washington Heights has an abundance of the same quality of life issues it had 10 years ago.I'd call the gentrification process there painfully slow.

Last edited by bluedog2; 02-20-2013 at 02:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2013, 02:37 PM
 
8,743 posts, read 18,380,404 times
Reputation: 4168
I agree...its not gentrifying fast by any means. It is a solidly Dominican nabe today, and will be 10 years from now (barring some sort of random mass airlift due to a terrorist attack, meteor strike, tsunami, or other such act of god). All those tenement buildings are well protected with rent stabilization...you are not getting anyone out unless they want to leave..and considering that population is a couple generations away from anything remotely close to "upwardly mobile status", they are here to stay. Indefinitely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2013, 04:47 PM
 
156 posts, read 285,750 times
Reputation: 92
Watched "The Heights"--made it through the first 20 minutes of the premiere before saying, "No way can I watch this trash." Too bad because I liked the thought of a show set in our neighborhood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2013, 05:14 PM
 
1,431 posts, read 2,619,083 times
Reputation: 1199
From the bits I've seen, I'm pretty sure The Heights is a force AGAINST gentrification, not for it.

Which is fine with me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2013, 05:20 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,199 posts, read 9,089,772 times
Reputation: 13959
There are sectors in Wash Heights that are gentrified like Hudson Heights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2013, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Pelham Parkway,The Bronx
9,247 posts, read 24,082,631 times
Reputation: 7759
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ryu View Post
There are sectors in Wash Heights that are gentrified like Hudson Heights.
Hudson Heights was not "gentrified". It was always a good neighborhood and never went down hill so there was/is no need for it to be "gentrified"."Gentrification" implies the turning around of a neighborhood that was down and out.Husdson Heights never needed to be turned around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2013, 09:00 PM
 
Location: Planet Earth
3,921 posts, read 9,131,897 times
Reputation: 1673
Quote:
Originally Posted by spook617 View Post
Is The Heights actually worth watching?
I live in WH now, and its not that bad. The express trains stop at 168 and. 163. There is smaller Dominican restaurants and stores, and there is bigger chains like CTown and Assosiated. I do spend most time in UWS though since no nightlife. (Although a bar opened up in Harlem at 149/Broadway which is great for those of us in the heights:-)
163rd is a local stop. The (A) stops at 145th, 168th, 175th, 181st, 190th, Dyckman, & 207th. (Though at times, it can be pretty slow for an express train, especially if there's congestion outside 59th Street)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
9,847 posts, read 25,248,887 times
Reputation: 3629
Quote:
Originally Posted by SobroGuy View Post
I agree...its not gentrifying fast by any means. It is a solidly Dominican nabe today, and will be 10 years from now (barring some sort of random mass airlift due to a terrorist attack, meteor strike, tsunami, or other such act of god). All those tenement buildings are well protected with rent stabilization...you are not getting anyone out unless they want to leave..and considering that population is a couple generations away from anything remotely close to "upwardly mobile status", they are here to stay. Indefinitely.
I don't think gentrification is really the right word. It's been a mixed income area for a long time, probably always. Will likely remain so. I will say this, in Wash Heights, as soon as a Dominican family can't pass their apartment to someone or an older person croaks and the apt hits the market the landlords are in there rehabbing and the apartments easily fetch market rent once they hit. It's a process but it's ongoing. In 25 to thirty years it probably won't be majority Dominican neighborhood anymore.

Also I've noticed in your comments you say Dominican like it's a bad word. Watch yourself, some might get offended. Not that you care...

Last edited by NooYowkur81; 02-21-2013 at 07:39 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 07:28 AM
 
Location: Bergen County, NJ
9,847 posts, read 25,248,887 times
Reputation: 3629
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog2 View Post
Hudson Heights was not "gentrified". It was always a good neighborhood and never went down hill so there was/is no need for it to be "gentrified"."Gentrification" implies the turning around of a neighborhood that was down and out.Husdson Heights never needed to be turned around.
You know how it is, people just throw around that word willy nilly now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 07:35 AM
 
Location: Toronto
2,801 posts, read 3,860,502 times
Reputation: 3154
Yeah, I guess gentrification was the wrong word for what I meant. It's a low-income, mostly Dominican area that is starting to attract higher income earners, young upwardly mobile people looking for cheaper rents in Manhattan, and a more diverse influx of residents fleeing the rising rents of other parts of the city. While it may not be true gentrification yet, give it time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top