Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-06-2013, 11:45 AM
 
419 posts, read 552,055 times
Reputation: 307

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
People always tell me to step out of my "East End Bubble" when I tout our city as being progressive, but the fact remains that nearly 100% of the people I know here in the East End ARE progressives, and we East Enders comprise more than half the city's population. In the Democratic mayoral primary Bill Peduto touted himself as being a "progressive" while his supposedly formidable opponent said he was "still evolving" on issues like same-sex marriage. Guess what? Peduto crushed Wagner by a double-digit margin (including in many areas OUTSIDE the East End). The embarrassing "God, gays, guns" old yinzer types that formerly would have launched Wagner into mayorship are dying off and being replaced by children who, while potentially not "progressive", are certainly much closer to center politically than their parents and who want to see Pittsburgh on the same level as Portland, Austin, Boulder, Asheville, Ann Arbor, Ithaca, Minneapolis, etc. on the national publicity radar to help entice new residents (including entrepreneurs) to move here and continue our renaissance.

I grew up in an upper-middle-class suburb of Scranton, which in and of itself is considered a "Democratic stronghold". It's served as the home at one point or another to PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane, U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, Vice President Joe Biden, and Hillary Clinton, all of whom are progressive Democrats. Nevertheless Pittsburgh blows Scranton out of the water in terms of being forward-thinking and intellectually-enriched. Since the cities are otherwise so comparable in terms of background, history, and composition I often tell people that Pittsburgh is like "Scranton on steroids---while waving a rainbow flag and smoking cannabis instead of beating you over the head with a Bible".

While places like Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, Lancaster County, Williamsport, the Central Susquehanna Valley, the Laurel Highlands, the PA Wilds, Cranberry Township, Endless Mountains, etc. may be "clinging to God, gays, guns", I find that there are still plentiful other parts of the state (beyond just Philadelphia and Pittsburgh) that are helping to pull us into the 21st Century. Places like State College, Lewisburg, New Hope, Bethlehem, Milford, Harrisburg, and even Erie. The majority of those "red" areas are declining while the "blue" areas are either stabilizing or growing.
I hope one day we can get out of this red vs. blue mentality. Many of us agree with views on both sides. Is red really a bad thing and is blue a good thing? I think the younger generation is much more moderate and progressive in terms of social issues, putting them more in the "blue" category. However, there is a split in terms of economics, taxes, job growth, and the appropriate size of government. That's where you will see some clinging more to the libertarian wing of the Republican Party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-06-2013, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Marshall-Shadeland, Pittsburgh, PA
32,620 posts, read 77,632,563 times
Reputation: 19102
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghdude28 View Post
I hope one day we can get out of this red vs. blue mentality. Many of us agree with views on both sides. Is red really a bad thing and is blue a good thing? I think the younger generation is much more moderate and progressive in terms of social issues, putting them more in the "blue" category. However, there is a split in terms of economics, taxes, job growth, and the appropriate size of government. That's where you will see some clinging more to the libertarian wing of the Republican Party.
I'm socially liberal and fiscally conservative. I don't believe the Bible has any place in legislative discussion in a nation that isn't a theocracy. Score one for the Democrats. I also don't believe in perpetually spending more money than you earn, building up debt that will have to be paid off by our posterity. Score one for the Republicans. I really don't fit in anywhere. I just wish Republicans would stop being such knuckle-dragging knuckleheads and back off the same-sex marriage fight because I'd probably ally myself to them otherwise. Their party is doomed if they don't back off the "God, gays, guns" mantra because the majority of younger people today (the future electorate) couldn't care less about those things. I happen to like (most) of Governor Corbett's fiscal policy because he's had to make very tough (and unpopular) decisions in terms of spending cuts in order to make us more fiscally-sound. On the other hand when he opens his mouth he perpetuates the "Pennsyltucky" stereotype by comparing my long-term relationship to incest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2013, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
1,723 posts, read 2,226,730 times
Reputation: 1145
What makes it even more ridiculous is that he apparently thought it was an improvement on the administration's previous analogy, which was comparing two gay adults to two children filing for a marriage license, which, although still somewhat negative at least wasn't completely demeaning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2013, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
7,541 posts, read 10,263,524 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
I'm socially liberal and fiscally conservative.

Not a winning strategy, if you were running for office statewide. The real trend is against fiscal conservatives, as the number of recipients of government programs has really gone up in recent years in Pennsylvania.

This is particularly in the center of the state, they reached their economic peaks a hundred or more years ago and are in very long term economic slump. The population in Bradford, PA, e.g., is less now than it was in 1880. There are few African Americans in those areas, because there was little sense in moving to a place during the great migration period, that didn't have much need for labor.

If both parties had the same view of the social issues, and the only differences were fiscal, the Democrats would do a whole lot better and the Republicans wouldn't stand a chance when all the votes were counted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-06-2013, 09:13 PM
 
58 posts, read 78,264 times
Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCityRising View Post
I'm socially liberal and fiscally conservative. I don't believe the Bible has any place in legislative discussion in a nation that isn't a theocracy. Score one for the Democrats. I also don't believe in perpetually spending more money than you earn, building up debt that will have to be paid off by our posterity. Score one for the Republicans. I really don't fit in anywhere. I just wish Republicans would stop being such knuckle-dragging knuckleheads and back off the same-sex marriage fight because I'd probably ally myself to them otherwise. Their party is doomed if they don't back off the "God, gays, guns" mantra because the majority of younger people today (the future electorate) couldn't care less about those things. I happen to like (most) of Governor Corbett's fiscal policy because he's had to make very tough (and unpopular) decisions in terms of spending cuts in order to make us more fiscally-sound. On the other hand when he opens his mouth he perpetuates the "Pennsyltucky" stereotype by comparing my long-term relationship to incest.
Anyone who consistently wants to raise taxes is not 'fiscally conservative'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top