Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-16-2016, 09:26 AM
 
5,894 posts, read 6,883,891 times
Reputation: 4107

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by xdv8 View Post
What makes think widening or lane expansion solves anything? More lanes just makes people drive more, it's called induced traffic and it's very real and very ignored. There is a reason why Atlanta is a sprawling mess, and a lot of it has to do with your logic. If you build bigger roads people feel more comfortable living further away creating more traffic.
You do realize that the proposals being discussed in this thread are interchange fixes/improvements not adding road lanes or expanding capacity right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-16-2016, 09:29 AM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,987,872 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by xdv8 View Post
What makes think widening or lane expansion solves anything? More lanes just makes people drive more, it's called induced traffic and it's very real and very ignored. There is a reason why Atlanta is a sprawling mess, and a lot of it has to do with your logic. If you build bigger roads people feel more comfortable living further away creating more traffic.
No need to use Atlanta as an example since we have a prime example right in Pittsburgh with the relatively newly built 279N that goes to Cranberry. That entire region exploded along that road and created the north hills from cow pastures. Did they build something better along the route? Certainly much better schools out that way and virtually no violent crime, so people did escape some things. Was it good for the city? Did it promote growth for the city in general since it is sort of a safe heaven away from crime and more people spending money in the city for work? I think I agree with you xdv8, that creating these roads could actually be backwards thinking. Couldn't the money be better spent to access the airport via public transportation of a better type than just some bus? The airport is so isolated. On the other hand I am a hypocrite because I want a fix at the Highland Park bridge area to make 28 4 lanes all the way from the city to north. At least I recognize my selfish ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2016, 09:30 AM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,987,872 times
Reputation: 17378
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKyank View Post
You do realize that the proposals being discussed in this thread are interchange fixes/improvements not adding road lanes or expanding capacity right?
lol, I guess my last post was regarding expansion. Still that seems like a lot of money, but there is a ton of waste in projects like this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2016, 09:33 AM
 
Location: East End, Pittsburgh
969 posts, read 772,565 times
Reputation: 1044
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKyank View Post
You do realize that the proposals being discussed in this thread are interchange fixes/improvements not adding road lanes or expanding capacity right?
Yes, I do understand that. Which is why I only quoted that part for my response.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2016, 09:36 AM
 
96 posts, read 73,617 times
Reputation: 99
New highways are one thing, I understand why many are against them.

But this is different. It's moderinizing an existing highway that isn't going anywhere any time soon. Better to improve safety and try to improve congestion a little bit. Maybe a decade from now driverless cars will render these types of improvements futile, but for now, they need to be addressed.

For Carnegie, it would be wonderful if they could eliminate the fact that part of the on-ramp is a residential street. This will be the most challenging project due to the space constraints and the railroad tracks below the highway.

Greentree should be a simple and elegant solution.

Banksville...cannot WAIT to see the renderings for the redesign! The lane switching is a big problem that needs to be addressed, but pretty sure the monster will still live there and we will still see backups for no reason other than that.

Maybe next they will move to the Parkway East and fix some of those convulted and outdated interchanges too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2016, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,157,682 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by xdv8 View Post
I do. But do I think the trip is so onerous that we need to spend that kind of money for a temporary fix, no. I'd support $100mm going towards public transit improvement, but not to encourage MORE driving. People drive more when road access is improved. Do you think we need more people driving more often?
So you think people are going to quit driving because the current design is garbage? I'm not one for building new swaths of highway out of nowhere, but the Parkway East and West are woefully inadequate for the area and have been that way for some time and need interchange improvements like this desperately. PA has some of the worst and most dangerous highway interchanges I have ever seen.

IIRC, a report rated the Parkway East and West amongst the worst interstates for congestion in the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2016, 09:54 AM
 
Location: Downtown Cranberry Twp.
41,016 posts, read 18,218,646 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by gg View Post
lol, I guess my last post was regarding expansion. Still that seems like a lot of money, but there is a ton of waste in projects like this one.
What should the project cost?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2016, 10:11 AM
 
Location: East End, Pittsburgh
969 posts, read 772,565 times
Reputation: 1044
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
So you think people are going to quit driving because the current design is garbage? I'm not one for building new swaths of highway out of nowhere, but the Parkway East and West are woefully inadequate for the area and have been that way for some time and need interchange improvements like this desperately. PA has some of the worst and most dangerous highway interchanges I have ever seen.

IIRC, a report rated the Parkway East and West amongst the worst interstates for congestion in the country.
I just don't think people should get overly excited for these improvements. I'm not going to cheerlead for spending 9 figures for on-ramps or road improvements at the periphery of the city. Too much money is spent on highway spending and too little on every other type of transportation. The idea of us building our way out of this driving culture mess has been proven to not work as every road eventually reaches capacity. But by all means, let's keep trying the same thing over nd over again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2016, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
12,526 posts, read 17,551,932 times
Reputation: 10634
I'm just hoping for more bike lanes in McCandless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2016, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,157,682 times
Reputation: 4053
Quote:
Originally Posted by xdv8 View Post
I just don't think people should get overly excited for these improvements. I'm not going to cheerlead for spending 9 figures for on-ramps or road improvements at the periphery of the city. Too much money is spent on highway spending and too little on every other type of transportation. The idea of us building our way out of this driving culture mess has been proven to not work as every road eventually reaches capacity. But by all means, let's keep trying the same thing over nd over again.
So we should let roads rot away instead? Not everyone can live in the East End and take transit everywhere they need to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top