Former ACORN employee sues O’Keefe and Giles (lawyer, fence, speech)

[SourD]

Originally Posted by mlassoff

Not in this case. The original unedited video has been located. That can be directly compared to the edited version. In this case its not he said-she said. It's "Let's go the video tape!"

let's go to it, nobody here has seen it and no information has been released about it's contents.

[SourD]

Originally Posted by chielgirl

I guess you missed the opening post.
Editing can easily be proven; police records can be proven.



Please look at my previous link about libel and slander.
It's against the law to edit a video for the purposes that they used it.
I guess right wing morality is a bit different from my view of morality.

If editing is illegal, then MSNBC should be sued for editing that video of a black man holding an AR-15. Wouldn't you agree?

[chielgirl]

Originally Posted by whatyousay

And editing is against the law? They didn't change what the ACORN workers said on tape, did they?

They falsified records, didn't they.
HIGHLY EDITED = lied.

[chielgirl]

Originally Posted by SourD

let's go to it, nobody here has seen it and no information has been released about it's contents.

OMG, it's like Obama's birth certificate.
Now they want to see the original tape that's currently in the court system.

Crazy, man, just crazy.

[Sid and Nancy]

Originally Posted by SourD

And so????? What is his grounds for suing? NONE!

The recording of the convesation was illegal. I provided links to the California statue.

[AuDiBelle]

Originally Posted by chielgirl

They falsified records, didn't they.
HIGHLY EDITED = lied.

Wow, so now you're the judge, jury and executioner? All without even seeing the "evi-dunce" too.

Care to prove they falsified anything?

[SourD]

Originally Posted by chielgirl

OMG, it's like Obama's birth certificate.
Now they want to see the original tape that's currently in the court system.

Crazy, man, just crazy.

That's how it works. You need to see the evidence. Crazy, man, just crazy..

[SourD]

Originally Posted by Sid and Nancy

The recording of the convesation was illegal. I provided links to the California statue.

The links you provided do not apply to this situation. He didn't make any money off this or any personal gain. So what is he suing for again?

[AuDiBelle]

Originally Posted by Sid and Nancy

The recording of the convesation was illegal. I provided links to the California statue.

That's not Vera's place to sue someone for breaking a law. That's the State of California's responsibility. Again, if he was wrongly fired because of it, he would first have to prove that by suing ACORN and then going after O'Keefe and Giles. As it stands, he has NO grounds for a lawsuit from what I've read.

[SourD]

Originally Posted by chielgirl

They falsified records, didn't they.
HIGHLY EDITED = lied.

Just like MSNBC did right?