Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-25-2010, 05:29 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,698,118 times
Reputation: 5132

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
Your argument is unbalanced and shortsighted as to cause and effect.

Comparison of Civil and Religious Rights

US Constitution
Amendment 1 – Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for redress of grievances.

Sharia Law


Non-Muslims are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. Non-Muslims are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures, or make a public display of feast days or funerals. Non-Muslims are forbidden to build new churches. A non-Muslim may not enter a mosque without permission. The protection for non-Muslims is withdrawn if a non-Muslim commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her, leads a Muslim away from Islam, kills a Muslim, or says anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam. (o11.5 through o11.10)


They cannot live side by side in this country.
They are opposites, with no common ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2010, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,290,293 times
Reputation: 2134
Conservatives love freedom, when it is for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 07:46 AM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,324,078 times
Reputation: 2337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
Sharia Law does not allow for separation of church and state. You should think about that one.
Yeah, the two are melded.

Every wonder where "Mosques" get their money?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,586 posts, read 84,818,250 times
Reputation: 115121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
There's plenty of land. Why do they want to build it there?
Do you think they didn't expect it to be controversial and it might offend many people?
Is there a possibility of them doing that on purpose? You know to divide us even more.
There's plenty of land IN MANHATTAN? You've got to be kidding me.

As to this tired old question of why they want to build it there--the same reason everyone else wants a church or synagogue or mosque in their own neighborhood.

And as has been stated over and over again--THEY ALREADY MEET THERE. They want to build a new building to replace the old, decrepit, damaged building they currently meet in.

A mosque has existed 12 blocks from the WTC for more than 30 years. Then a few years ago this group started to meet in the old Burlington Coat Factory. But now that the neighborhood community board approved the building of the new building and the NY Post got hold of it and put some fancy twists on the story on a slow news day, everyone and their brother is suddenly against the presence of Muslims in lower Manhattan.

About 300 Muslims were killed in the WTC attacks. A lot more ran for their lives out of that building that day--an approximate total 15,000 people got out of those buildings alive--are people so misinformed that they really think that none of them were Muslim???? Are people also so incredibly naive that they think no Muslims are working on the huge rebuilding project at the WTC site in lower Manhattan? How far do we take this? Fire engineers, finance people and construction workers because they belong to the same religion as the one 19 terrorists claimed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,586 posts, read 84,818,250 times
Reputation: 115121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevar242 View Post
Maybe Newt can hear the silent voices of the thousands of dead innocent Americans
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohKnip View Post
Nice appeal to emotion.
Except, I guess, that the voices of the dead innocent American Muslims don't really count, so maybe we should subtract a few hundred. That should lift the emotional distress of the bigots, knowing that some of the people that were killed didn't really count anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 09:28 AM
 
4,814 posts, read 3,844,930 times
Reputation: 1120
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
They are opposites, with no common ground.
Exactly! An article and a law suit you might enjoy reading.

Quote:
Top Ten reasons why Sharia is Bad for all Societies
American Thinker: Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all societies
The lawsuit is in regard to David Yerushalmi and the Thomas More Law Center lawsuit against the US government's acceptance, promotion and advancement of sharia (Islamic law and finance).

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/f...for_filing.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 09:29 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Perhaps Newt opposes Islam as it looks down on adulterers like himself.

No word yet on Islam's position RE: adulterous hypocritical witch hunters, another Newtie boy specialty
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 09:31 AM
 
1,743 posts, read 2,160,218 times
Reputation: 954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pressing-On View Post
Sharia Law does not allow for separation of church and state. You should think about that one.
Neither do Biblical principles. That is why the USA was founded on secular enlightenment principles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 09:34 AM
 
1,743 posts, read 2,160,218 times
Reputation: 954
Hmm. Maybe Christian churches shouldn't be built on or near Indian reservations or concentration camps in Germany..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2010, 10:02 AM
 
Location: S.E. US
13,163 posts, read 1,698,118 times
Reputation: 5132
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuixoticHobbit View Post
Neither do Biblical principles. That is why the USA was founded on secular enlightenment principles
You'd probably be surprised to know that there are Christian churches that most definitely do NOT want entanglement of church and state, for many good reasons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top