Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They actaully showed since conseption in just 2008 that they are a force to be reckoned with. Its the republican party that ran those rejected by them. Just look at the number of democrats that losss that actaully has chairmanships . Then look at now close mnay of the races they losss were. That and the governorships are a basis fo0r celebration in a two year old monve,ment that people made fun of when it started.Palin had more effect as a losing vice president than former presidentail candaidtes and presidents.Hard to believe that a lossing vice presdidentail canidate had this kind of politcal power when they usually are seldom heard from much ater lossing.
I don't think so, because even if O'Donnell had won they still would be the minority. Did any other Tea Party Senate Candidates lose yesterday?
Linda McMahon in Conn, Sharon Angle, John Raese in WV, Buck in CO and it looks like Miller in Alaska--most of the biggies that Palin supported. Rand Paul won in KY, but that was largely because the Dem made some really dumb campaign moves.
I don't think so. I think Angle cost them Nevada and O'Donnell cost them Delaware, but that still wouldn't have been enough to take the Senate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.