Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: ????????
Obama 41 73.21%
Carter 15 26.79%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2011, 04:24 AM
 
3,767 posts, read 4,533,990 times
Reputation: 1395

Advertisements

It looks like Barack has won ,er lost by a landslide.

Ok we will say he won the worst president award, but unlike his Nobel Peace prize it looks like her really earned this honor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2011, 05:09 AM
 
7,975 posts, read 7,361,148 times
Reputation: 12046
Obama is worse, because he's ruined it for all of the good, qualified African American candidates who run for President in the future. They will have have an awful stigma to overcome. The result of all that media fawning Obamamania has set things back 20 years. I can't see the media flashing the "tingly" card for any deserving African American candidates in future campaigns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 05:23 AM
 
3,767 posts, read 4,533,990 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Skeffington View Post
Obama is worse, because he's ruined it for all of the good, qualified African American candidates who run for President in the future. They will have have an awful stigma to overcome. The result of all that media fawning Obamamania has set things back 20 years. I can't see the media flashing the "tingly" card for any deserving African American candidates in future campaigns.
Well I don't know if I agree as hopefully we will judge the man and not the color of his skin.
I know I certainly will not hold it against any future black candidates because of Barack just as I wouldn't hold it against any future whites becuase of Clinton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 10:49 AM
 
3,153 posts, read 3,597,017 times
Reputation: 1080
Obama - a HISTORIC failure of HISTORIC proportions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 11:02 AM
 
24,832 posts, read 37,372,654 times
Reputation: 11539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Skeffington View Post
Obama is worse, because he's ruined it for all of the good, qualified African American candidates who run for President in the future. They will have have an awful stigma to overcome. The result of all that media fawning Obamamania has set things back 20 years. I can't see the media flashing the "tingly" card for any deserving African American candidates in future campaigns.
I think that is true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 02:47 PM
 
Location: 3rd Rock fts
762 posts, read 1,100,505 times
Reputation: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by liebknecht View Post
Carter was a good president. Very popular over here in Europe. Obama has the ungrateful job of cleaning up after Bush. It's still too early to judge his administration in my opinion.
You'll have to excuse the average American citizen when it comes to Jimmy Carter. You see, if we would have listened to him 30+ years ago (renewable energy/foreign oil dependency) the USA would be a world leader in SMART ENERGY today!

Instead, the USA now has the astute reputation of an animalistic, consumption-driven beast, oblivious to anything/everyone around them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 02:59 PM
 
Location: right here
4,160 posts, read 5,626,452 times
Reputation: 4929
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSOs View Post
You'll have to excuse the average American citizen when it comes to Jimmy Carter. You see, if we would have listened to him 30+ years ago (renewable energy/foreign oil dependency) the USA would be a world leader in SMART ENERGY today!

Instead, the USA now has the astute reputation of an animalistic, consumption-driven beast, oblivious to anything/everyone around them.
Let's see....during his four years in the White House, he presided over the worst economic downturn since World War II-gas prices rose I believe 400%, allowed a bunch of thugs to seize our embassy and our citizens, and supported various dictators (Philippine dictator Fernando Marcos).

Also when a president receives a Noble Peace Prize...he is destined to be a bad president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 03:08 PM
 
3,283 posts, read 5,211,135 times
Reputation: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSOs View Post
You'll have to excuse the average American citizen when it comes to Jimmy Carter. You see, if we would have listened to him 30+ years ago (renewable energy/foreign oil dependency) the USA would be a world leader in SMART ENERGY today!

Instead, the USA now has the astute reputation of an animalistic, consumption-driven beast, oblivious to anything/everyone around them.

no we wouldn't. energy efficiency will only be driven by energy prices. fake constraints like carbon taxes, cafe standards, subsidized public transport and the like will not work. you might think they are popular until they are imposed on the people. when that happens and people see their std of living drop they'll vote the govt out.

if however, the govt stops subsidizing energy. if they stop subsidizing energy infrastructure and the people are forced to pay the full cost to maintain and build the roads they drive on, the gas they consume, the oil supply we protect and the electricity we use, alternatives will emerge on their own. i doubt they will look anything like the high speed rail boondoggles this president wants to build, though. honestly it will be the individuals who will drive energy independence by making simple changes in their lives

technology is only quarter of the solution our attitudes are the other 75%. while we only pay a fraction for the energy we use, there is no incentive for our attitudes to change
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 03:13 PM
 
27,170 posts, read 15,352,042 times
Reputation: 12086
"Barack Obama vs Jimmy Carter"



Is this like that show, "The Biggest Loser"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2011, 03:16 PM
 
3,767 posts, read 4,533,990 times
Reputation: 1395
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
"Barack Obama vs Jimmy Carter"

Is this like that show, "The Biggest Loser"?
Well one of them gets to win this poll!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top