Another Bad Wisconsin Poll For Gov Walker (vs, doctor, own)

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

Note that those are mentioned as possible factors that might explain such a cost differential. There was no indication that teachers were actually getting better benefits for that price.

Which of course are questions that an actual scholarly paper (rather than a propaganda piece) would have endeavored to answer.

[shorebaby]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

Yes. So, I suppose you intend to demonstrate where I have equivocated? Because you do not do so in this post.


Okay... good start.

Now, finish the thought.

What are the difference in the coverage associated wth the differences in premiums?

Come on. You can do it.

None. my friend.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

You've got that backwards, HD. I presented data. You disputed the data, but have failed to make any supported argument for your position.

No... IC.

You have presented no data.

Look it up.

"Data."

It's not that difficult a concept, really.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

No... IC.

You have presented no data.

Look it up.

"Data."

It's not that difficult a concept, really.

There is quite a bit of data in the 2 reports.

You can't support your position. Hmmm...

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

That wasn't the conclusion. Read it again. There was no indication that teachers were actually getting better benefits for that price.

Please... point us exactly to the place in the report where it says "There was no indication that teachers were actually getting better benefits for that price."

[shorebaby]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

No its not. You really need to take a breath and catch up by reading the thread.

Then pause for a moment and consider the deep philosophical implications of being asked to prove a negative.

Then, get a clue.

My you are an angry one, aren't you?

Are you suggesting one can't prove a negative? Be careful......

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by shorebaby

None. my friend.

Awesome!!! You've put a stake in the ground. You have made an affirmative assertion!

Now... prove it.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by InformedConsent

There is quite a bit of data in the 2 reports.

But you haven't presented any of it.

You have only presented the analysis.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by shorebaby

My you are an angry one, aren't you?

Angry?

Oh pulleeeeze!

Originally Posted by shorebaby

Are you suggesting one can't prove a negative?

I am being explicit that in this case IC has lied. He has repeatedly asserted that I said something.

What exactly would you have me point to to prove I never said it?

On the other hand, IC could effortlessly prove he was not lying simply by linking to the post where I actually said what he claims.

The burden of proof is entirely on him... or you since you have positioned yourself as his white knight.

[florida.bob]

Gov Walker's Agri guy, calls the protests in the Capital as "Holocaust" like. A very in tune Admin in Madison?