Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All your sources are from left to far left sources so I won't waste time reading any I haven't seen before. That would be none.
Nice handwaving. That's what you always do in the face of the truth.
Funny, the right calls SNOPES far left and the LEFT calls Snopes Far right. Yet both can never refute their articles (which are footnoted with where they get their information from).
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,839,921 times
Reputation: 6438
I once read an article somewhere that said Snopes was actually a creation to prove Obama correct, and the rest was just window dressing to hide the fact that that's all the site was created for. And that it was created years prior to him actually becoming president, to give it more street cred for when he became president.
And my brain ass-ploded.
Seriously though, I love birthers. Within seconds, you know they are raging loons simply by what they type. And hey, they can focus on this foolish crap while the big people handle the hard stuff. I think it keeps their widdle hands busy.
Last but not least, what if they were right? America would look like the world's biggest dumbass. Maybe that's what they want the world to think of us, I dunno. Think about it..... you had a man who was a Senator and a President and he wasn't legit? HAHAAHa they'd be laughing at us for years.
As an outsider (I'm Canadian) I can only conclude the the problem birthers have with Obama is the fact that he is not white....I see no other reasonable explanation since we all know now, and have seen evidence of when and where he was born..
If you birthers have another explanation please enlighten me.
Birthers are racists because you're confused?
Here it is in a nutshell.
The issue came up that he may not be eligible.
Since he is/was going to be President some American people want the assurance that he is indeed eligible.
Because the issue came up there is a question.
Difficulty in having it directly addressed is the problem of why the question is unresolved to the dissatisfaction of many.
There is no reason why the People can not demand a definitive answer.
The are a lot of people in the U.S. outside of those considered "Birthers" that have doubts and curiosity.
The issue came up that he may not be eligible.
Since he is/was going to be President some American people want the assurance that he is indeed eligible.
Because the issue came up there is a question.
Difficulty in having it directly addressed is the problem of why the question is unresolved to the dissatisfaction of many.
There is no reason why the People can not demand a definitive answer.
The are a lot of people in the U.S. outside of those considered "Birthers" that have doubts and curiosity.
How is he not eligible? So tell me then since neither his birth certificate, nor the birth announcement recorded in the newspaper do not satisfy you, then what would satisfy you...Do you need a time machine to go back and actually watch his birth?
I have been called a liar right in a post on this thread for saying that I didn't really think about progs getting into this thread first so took a chance. Had I thought that a bunch of Obamaites would get here first and steal the thread for one of their "He is legal threads" I wouldn't have done it. It just happens that I really didn't think this would turn into a non-link watching celebration and will try to be more careful so as not to rile you Obamaites in the future. Nope, last night I was just tired and didn't think about what might happen.
Go ahead and call me a liar. It took my turning the first person to call me a liar twice and one of you helping out to get that one taken down. Maybe you can sneak in one if I don't catch it soon enough. Call me anything that makes your little hind end wiggle and I will usually let it stand.
What does being called a liar have to do with anything, I just think you're perhaps a bit clueless, and certainly a paper tiger.
As far as the hind end comment, that was in very poor taste, and a very weak attempt at an insult.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
Sorry, but I don't read National Review and had never seen that one. I am too busy dealing with progs here to read many things other than Townhall and Newsmax but will try to look in on yours when I can.
Honestly, I had never seen that one up to now. Now you have another chance to call me a liar. Let 'er fly.
You sure dont like to be corrected, do you, why is that?
You really should try to read more, and obsess about others on here less, for your own well-being, if nothing else.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Birthers aren't necessarily racists...
