Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Even a tea party website clarified the story and stated that the city had not intended the ban to apply to people carrying signs, but to signs being affixed on structures. Newsmax = rag.
Spin master award goes to you! The Tea Party in question GOT AN EMAIL clarifying the situation. Newsmax didn't get that same email. The story broke before it was UPDATED.
This entire thread is about signs that have been deemed "too controversial", you brought up race in a thread that had nothing to do with it whatsoever.
This entire thread is about signs that have been deemed "too controversial", you brought up race in a thread that had nothing to do with it whatsoever.
I asked for examples of racist signs at the teachers rally and you came up with this.
No, but it's pretty flippin' controversial. Of course Palin was raked over the coals by the hypocritical left for the same thing but it's fine here because they are union lefties....
Even a tea party website clarified the story and stated that the city had not intended the ban to apply to people carrying signs, but to signs being affixed on structures. Newsmax = rag.
read the article. the city had banned the signs until Tea party brought the law suit. The News max article was before the Law suit was filed
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.