Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is that why Bush wanted to grant Amnesty? Or was it to please his best bud Fox in Mexico?
Casper
The Dems are getting crazier by the minute. On one hand they condem Bush as the anti-christ, yet praise Obama for sticking to his policies. You can't make this stuff up!
The GOP doesn't have squat except for a bunch of puppets serving thier masters.
Wait. That's the Democrats.
Wait. That's the middle class.
Wait...we are all f***ed!
There are several problems with the GOP.
#1 Democrats giving away the treasury for 40+ years has been a force hard to compete with (of course that has bankrupted the country).
#2 Many there are beltway hacks with no spine and like most all politicians they are there for self enrichment it seems and reelection.
#3 The Democrats are basically leading us toward the same things communists would, and Republicans don't always understand you don't meet in the middle with a communist.
If a balanced budget and smaller functioning government is (Food), then growing government, government employees and constant 1000% red budgets are (poison).
Should there be a middle ground between food and poison? I don't think so because I think a little poison is no good either.
Obama caused a huge ground roots movement to come about and they are trying to get into both the Republican and Democrat party to become more fiscally conservative.
We need a Balanced Budget Amendment with everything on budget. We have small groups that will grow within both parties that will get us there.
There has never been in the history of this country to have such a petty, childish, divisive, rank partisan sitting in the White House.
He just can't help himself...for some reason he thinks this goes over well with the American people...but really, it's only his far left fringe support that likes this kind of divisiveness.
So he has alienated the more sensible liberals (in the GOP vernacular, that is an oxymoron) that initially voted for him?
Well I think we all heard him say in that clip that he has taken care of illegal immigration and anyone who asks him to do more is unreasonable. i don't think that is a very persuasive position.
I sincerely doubt anyone will ask him in detail to do anymore, or anything at all. They know they can't deliver, nor will they fund it, nor will many of their constituents like it. If every single illegal immigrant was deported by 5 PM tonight, people would be screaming even louder by tomorrow evening.
There are several problems with the GOP.
#1 Democrats giving away the treasury for 40+ years has been a force hard to compete with (of course that has bankrupted the country).
#2 Many there are beltway hacks with no spine and like most all politicians they are there for self enrichment it seems and reelection.
#3 The Democrats are basically leading us toward the same things communists would, and Republicans don't always understand you don't meet in the middle with a communist.
If a balanced budget and smaller functioning government is (Food), then growing government, government employees and constant 1000% red budgets are (poison).
Should there be a middle ground between food and poison? I don't think so because I think a little poison is no good either.
Obama caused a huge ground roots movement to come about and they are trying to get into both the Republican and Democrat party to become more fiscally conservative.
We need a Balanced Budget Amendment with everything on budget. We have small groups that will grow within both parties that will get us there.
RCCCB. This is closer to agreement for us. Responsible, sensible fiscal policy is something we can all get behind. However, the concentration of wealth in this country continues to go to the wealthiest leaving the middle class footing much of the bill and left out in the cold. This seems to be regardless of the party in office or controlling the house and senate. It seems something more drastic needs to be done. Short of anarchy, I am not sure what that is.
He didn't lie, but you did. The number of agents has been increased at the southern border, the fence has been expanded, and electronic surveillance has been boosted.
Has that solved the problem?
Does any of that matter when the border is still basically wide open?
NO.
Don't go around praising yourself for a job 1/100th done.
But then again, patting himself on the back seems to be what he does best.
Read the Mexican constitution and then tell me who the more inclusive peoples are.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
