Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i dont have a problem with oreilly going after weiner.
i just wish he would be fair and balanced regarding attacking both the left and right, which he is not.
you heard nothing from oreilly when that republican up in ny-26 resigned over the craigslist sex scandal.
with weiner though, a more notable congressman who is liberal, oreilly goes after him multiple days.
thats why nobody buys that dumb fair and balanced tag.
You may have a point here, I don't remember his coverage of that or lack of coverage. Perhaps a difference here is that, as you mention, Weiner is "a more notable congressman." In addition, that guy resigned and was gone while Weiner has claimed his account was hacked then wouldn't answer questions about whether or not the picture was him and became combative with the press. Personally, I don't care what Weiner does, as stupid as this move would be, but his handling of it has made it drag on.
Regardless of your platform, what Weiner did was stupid and wrong. No one is dumb enough to think he didn't send these photos.. there is no other explanation. He should resign.. I understand he is desperately trying to deflect the issue and keep his job but seriously.. he should resign.
If he actually did send the picture, it would indicate that he was pretty dumb. If we had all dumb members of Congress resign, we wouldn't have many left ..... Hmmmm, on second thought....ah, but then it becomes an argument about, is your member dumber than mine.
Oh really, is that breaking news? I haven't read anything about him being found guilty.
That's how you want to play it? Ok.
The entire basis of that idiot's rant was something that O'Reilly was involved in back in 2004. According to O'Donnell, that case was settled. NO ADMISSION OF GUILT, and no jury trial.
So, using your own criteria, the idiot O'Donnell shouldn't even be talking about it, much less spending as much airtime on it as he did, but here you are, defending him and his rant like there's no tomorrow.
Spin away. I can't wait to see how you try to rationalize your defense of O'Donnell's rant after having your hypocritical position thrown in your face.
The entire basis of that idiot's rant was something that O'Reilly was involved in back in 2004. According to O'Donnell, that case was settled. NO ADMISSION OF GUILT, and no jury trial.
So, using your own criteria, the idiot O'Donnell shouldn't even be talking about it, much less spending as much airtime on it as he did, but here you are, defending him and his rant like there's no tomorrow.
Spin away. I can't wait to see how you try to rationalize your defense of O'Donnell's rant after having your hypocritical position thrown in your face.
O'Donnell is hypocritical for pointing out O'Tidely's hypocrisy?
The entire basis of that idiot's rant was something that O'Reilly was involved in back in 2004. According to O'Donnell, that case was settled. NO ADMISSION OF GUILT, and no jury trial.
So, using your own criteria, the idiot O'Donnell shouldn't even be talking about it, much less spending as much airtime on it as he did, but here you are, defending him and his rant like there's no tomorrow.
Spin away. I can't wait to see how you try to rationalize your defense of O'Donnell's rant after having your hypocritical position thrown in your face.
It's been widely reported that O'Reilly settled with Andrea Mackris for MILLIONS, let's see
what Bill O has to say tonight on The Factor....
Weiner has shown himself to be a creep, liar, and an incompetent fool, so what do you do if youre a lib? Ignore or deflect or defend.
This wouldn't be so funny if it weren't for the mass of people on this thread picking on such relevant factors such as the manner in which O'Donnell speaks. Honk honk!
It's been widely reported that O'Reilly settled with Andrea Mackris for MILLIONS,
No doubt. To pay someone off with multi-millions of dollars to keep their mouth shut would only happen in a very serious case. I'm sure we're talking marriage ending, fired from fox, long term prison sentence actions.
The entire basis of that idiot's rant was something that O'Reilly was involved in back in 2004. According to O'Donnell, that case was settled. NO ADMISSION OF GUILT, and no jury trial.
So, using your own criteria, the idiot O'Donnell shouldn't even be talking about it, much less spending as much airtime on it as he did, but here you are, defending him and his rant like there's no tomorrow.
Spin away. I can't wait to see how you try to rationalize your defense of O'Donnell's rant after having your hypocritical position thrown in your face.
Let's play lawyerball! Are you so naive to believe that wealthy guilty people don't pay off the victims and the judicial system to avoid prosecution for their crimes? Few innocent people settle for millions out of court.
It's been widely reported that O'Reilly settled with Andrea Mackris for MILLIONS
As it pertains to this discussion, and more specifically the point you made about Weiner not having been found guilty of the offense in question, it doesn't matter. Don't deflect - it's unbecoming.
Your implication is that since Weiner hasn't been convicted of anything, then he shouldn't be attacked. O'Reilly also wasn't convicted of anything, yet you've got a man-crush over O'Donnell for doing exactly what you're saying that people shouldn't be doing.
The hypocrisy that you're demonstrating is just dripping.
Let's play lawyerball! Are you so naive to believe that wealthy guilty people don't pay off the victims and the judicial system to avoid prosecution for their crimes? Few innocent people settle for millions out of court.
Are you so naive to believe that wealthy innocent people don't "pay off" extortionists to keep from having to deal with the stress and expense of fighting such a battle? Not to mention the damage done to their reputation, regardless of the outcome.
But again, whether or not O'Reilly actually did what his accuser(s) claim, IT DOESN'T MATTER. He did not admit guilt, and there was no jury trial.
Hypocrisy stinks, and this thread reeks of it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
