Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:37 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,894,256 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
I'll be here waiting for the "dude" to come up with a coherent response.
Well, I'll come up with a coherent response.

Even if there were only one fossil that supported the theory of evolution rather than the millions of them, that would be more concrete evidence than you've offered to support the existence of a creator. The argument that a creator MUST exist is not an argument. It's an assertion. A creator MUST exist because something had to create the universe? What you are saying is that "A" must exist because "B" exists. But that's not true. "B" can exist whether "A" exists or not. And if you introduce causality into the relationship between "A" and "B", then you cannot dismiss the question of causality between a "pre-A" and "A". If "A" can exist without causality, then "B" can exist without causality, unless you can proffer some hard evidence that "B" cannot exist without causality. You can cite the laws of thermodynamics ad nauseum, and yet they don't support your argument because they don't put forth any hard evidence that "B" cannot exist without causality. The laws of science describe the world around us as it is today. And science has gaps. Our understanding of our world, or our universe, is incomplete. As humans, we endeavor to fill in those gaps, to make our understanding of the universe more complete. For many people, part of that understanding involves a god. Each of us see the world around us in a subjective way, and the belief in a god is subjective. Science strives to be objective. Yes, it fails. Science is a methodology practice by humans, by subjective humans who cannot escape their own personal perspectives, but the methodology itself is not subjective. (Except a lot of scientists are somewhat elitists, and look down on certain disciplines. Humans, huh? Always trying to best one another.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Hillsboro, OR
2,200 posts, read 4,424,276 times
Reputation: 1386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
Run from what? You and the others whining because you can't or won't understand it? That's pretty typical atheist strategy. You guys whine and moan about the argument regardless of the facts....then claim victory when we grow tired of your stubborness.
Is it our fault you have based your entire argument on logical fallacies and no evidence?

Nope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:39 PM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,391,265 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
I honestly don't feel like typing a nice long post to get ignored by you or anyone else. But I'm not surprised that your response is "well, you just don't understand it because you must be dumb". Very typical elitist attitude that you guys tend to take on. Believe it or not, you might not be the smartest guy in the room. It is possible for a smart person to reject a fairy tale like evolution.
I think he is saying you just don't understand it, because you keep proving that you don't understand it... with all your posts on the topic.

You don't need to be particularly intelligent to understand Evolution. But taking your fingers out of your ears and opening your eyes certainly helps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Hillsboro, OR
2,200 posts, read 4,424,276 times
Reputation: 1386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
I think he is saying you just don't understand it, because you keep proving that you don't understand it... with all your posts on the topic.

You don't need to be particularly intelligent to understand Evolution. But taking your fingers out of your ears and opening your eyes certainly helps.
That might be a challenge for them. It requires brain processes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,085,613 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
Run from what?
Addressing the simple fact that the cosmological argument is internally contradictory and self refuting. The specific contradiction has been pointed out to you countless times, and you run away from it every time. Two different posters have raised it in this thread alone, and you ignored both.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist
You and the others whining because you can't or won't understand it?
We understand it perfectly. And we also address it directly. We do not run away. We do not ignore. We do not pretend posts were never made.

We answer you.

You on the other hand run away. Every time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:48 PM
 
Location: Hillsboro, OR
2,200 posts, read 4,424,276 times
Reputation: 1386
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Addressing the simple fact that the cosmological argument is internally contradictory and self refuting. The specific contradiction has been pointed out to you countless times, and you run away from it every time. Two different posters have raised it in this thread alone, and you ignored both.


We understand it perfectly. And we also address it directly. We do not run away. We do not ignore. We do not pretend posts were never made.

We answer you.

You on the other hand run away. Every time.
...or they constantly repeat the same question over and over again, pretending they didn't hear/see anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:51 PM
 
Location: The Heartland
4,458 posts, read 4,193,044 times
Reputation: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quan12 View Post
Since when is clinging to creationism thinking "outside the box"? That's been the normative story for thousands of years. Science and the prospect of no creator is actually the true "out of the box" thinking.
You think spewing Darwin is "out of the box thinking"? There are no other possible ideas or theories? I hope not because learning will become stagnant if that is all we do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Long Beach, CA
195 posts, read 186,506 times
Reputation: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
Run from what? You and the others whining because you can't or won't understand it? That's pretty typical atheist strategy. You guys whine and moan about the argument regardless of the facts....then claim victory when we grow tired of your stubborness.
Except that is exactly what you are doing.

You accuse others of not being able to understand, then dismiss their explanations and say that it can not be understood... you accuse them of being stubborn, even as you dismiss, insult, and demean them rather than consider what they say.... you accuse them of declaring "Victory" without cause, why you at the same time declare you have "proven" your claim when you have not for the reasons they have mentioned.

I also love your assertion that anyone that disagrees with you must be an Atheist or at the very least the hasty generalization of implying that most are. You do realize people could both believe in God or have faith... and still find flaw in your logic or disagree with your claims right?

You have not provided any facts regarding your claim, you have presented correlation and parlayed that into assertion to make a claim that your opinion is factual without proving a single claim you have made. That is the point... there is no "proof" for God as the only logical possibility for cause, just as there is no logical proof why a dogmatic belief should be presented and taught as science.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:54 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,085,613 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUEGRITT View Post
You think spewing Darwin is "out of the box thinking"?
Actually... yes.

If you actually understood Darwin, you would never have asked that question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUEGRITT
There are no other possible ideas or theories? I hope not because learning will become stagnant if that is all we do.
There are always other possible ideas or theories. But there is often only one best theory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 03:56 PM
 
Location: The Heartland
4,458 posts, read 4,193,044 times
Reputation: 760
Quote:
Originally Posted by psulions2007 View Post
That might be a challenge for them. It requires brain processes.
You must have a low self esteem problem, I find that with people who like to attempt to belittle anyone who does not think like they do. The great ones had and have ideas of their own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top