Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Taxing everyone earning $1 million would have what impact on the deficit?
$1.65 trillion (we might even have a surplus) 10 27.78%
$1.3 trillion 1 2.78%
$1 trillion 4 11.11%
$800 billion 0 0%
$500 billion 1 2.78%
Less than $200 billion or less than 12% of the deficit 20 55.56%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-18-2011, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,940,293 times
Reputation: 16587

Advertisements

Obama appears to be putting anyone earning $1 million or more against the wall next to the IRS building.

We we taxed everyone earning $1 million and more at a 80% tax rate what impact would this have on the national deficit?

It should be noted if taxed at 80% anyone filthy enough to earn over $1 million dollars would be left with close to nothing once state and local taxes were paid.

As for the nations current financial position consider the following:

US Tax Revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
Federal Budget: $3,820,000,000,000
New National Debt: $1,650,000,000,000
National Debt: $14,271,000,000,000

We need $1.650 trillion to balance the budget.

How much would an 80% income tax (no deductions either) raise?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2011, 07:26 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,854,052 times
Reputation: 20030
not a whole lot. understand that those making more than $1 million per year will figure a way to either get close to, but not make that thresh hold, or will move their companies out of the country so they dont have to pay the surtax. every time a millionares tax has been instituted, the millionares left the area. witness what happened in maryland and other states when that happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 07:33 PM
 
12,997 posts, read 13,649,010 times
Reputation: 11192
We'd raise more than $1.65 trillion, but that tax rate is too high. (It takes a lot for me to say that.) Why don't we reinstate the estate tax at a 50 percent rate for estates over $2 million instead?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,184,310 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
We'd raise more than $1.65 trillion, but that tax rate is too high. (It takes a lot for me to say that.) Why don't we reinstate the estate tax at a 50 percent rate for estates over $2 million instead?
No it wouldn't. According to 2009 data on the IRS website, there were 236,883 tax returns with AGI > $1M, representing $727M of income. Multipling by 80% would result in $582M of tax revenue. Not additional tax revenue, total tax revenue, since that money is already taxed. That income generated $177M in taxes in 2009. So the OP's proposed rate, assuming he means total tax rate, will generate about $405M of additional tax revenue.

I think a tax rate like that would be devastating to the economy. Money would leave the USA faster than you can imagine.

As for the estate tax - I could entertain higher estate tax rates on "dynastic" wealth transfers (say > $1B), but I full expect to die with more than $2M of wealth and I think I should be able to pass it on to anyone of my choosing without taxes paid by the recipients. It does not matter whether or not they earned it or not. I did - by virtue of working a lifetime to earn it and pay taxes on it multiple times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
We'd raise more than $1.65 trillion, but that tax rate is too high. (It takes a lot for me to say that.) Why don't we reinstate the estate tax at a 50 percent rate for estates over $2 million instead?

Better yet, why don't we reduce government spending... no need to increase anybody's taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 08:06 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,057,820 times
Reputation: 10270
Another great depression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 08:13 PM
 
12,997 posts, read 13,649,010 times
Reputation: 11192
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
No it wouldn't. According to 2009 data on the IRS website, there were 236,883 tax returns with AGI > $1M, representing $727M of income. Multipling by 80% would result in $582M of tax revenue. Not additional tax revenue, total tax revenue, since that money is already taxed. That income generated $177M in taxes in 2009. So the OP's proposed rate, assuming he means total tax rate, will generate about $405M of additional tax revenue.

I think a tax rate like that would be devastating to the economy. Money would leave the USA faster than you can imagine.

As for the estate tax - I could entertain higher estate tax rates on "dynastic" wealth transfers (say > $1B), but I full expect to die with more than $2M of wealth and I think I should be able to pass it on to anyone of my choosing without taxes paid by the recipients. It does not matter whether or not they earned it or not. I did - by virtue of working a lifetime to earn it and pay taxes on it multiple times.
I'm not sure where you are getting your figure. According to a very rightwing source: "The Total Taxable Income for millionaires was $626,464,479,000 in 2009. So, if the Federal government taxed millionaires at a 100% tax rate, it would pay for 53.5% of the 2009 deficit."

I was assuming millionaires get taxed at 80 percent and everyone else still gets taxed at the same rate they are currently being taxed. If that were the case, we'd run a huge surplus.

That's a stupidly high rate though. How come when someone suggest raising taxes on millionaires by a few percentage points, we have to talk in hyperbolic extremes of more than doubling their current rate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 08:17 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,944,845 times
Reputation: 12828
They could be taxed at 100% and all their wealth confiscated and it would not pay off the national debt.


"Class warfare may make for good politics, but it is rotten economics." Eric Cantor today on Twitter

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,292 posts, read 20,749,540 times
Reputation: 9330
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
I'm not sure where you are getting your figure. According to a very rightwing source: "The Total Taxable Income for millionaires was $626,464,479,000 in 2009. So, if the Federal government taxed millionaires at a 100% tax rate, it would pay for 53.5% of the 2009 deficit."

I was assuming millionaires get taxed at 80 percent and everyone else still gets taxed at the same rate they are currently being taxed. If that were the case, we'd run a huge surplus.

That's a stupidly high rate though. How come when someone suggest raising taxes on millionaires by a few percentage points, we have to talk in hyperbolic extremes of more than doubling their current rate?

Do a little research. When you tax the uber wealthy at ridiculous rates, they go away. Try treading about NJ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 08:22 PM
 
12,997 posts, read 13,649,010 times
Reputation: 11192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Do a little research. When you tax the uber wealthy at ridiculous rates, they go away. Try treading about NJ.
I agree with you, Roadking. You can't tax anyone, rich or otherwise, at that ridiculous rate. I seem to recall rich people running around before Bush though. I think we can safely go back to the pre Bush tax rates -- for everyone, not just the rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top