Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:25 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,950,438 times
Reputation: 3159

Advertisements

This will take $1000 out of the pockets of working men and women in this country.

1 republican voted for extending the tax reduction and three democrats voted against it. All but one Republican voted against giving on average $1000 for working men and women in this country.


Payroll Tax Cut Extension Rejected In Senate Vote
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:26 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
It was temporary. We'll just go back to what we had a mere 11 months ago.
Should be NBD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:35 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,198,598 times
Reputation: 7693
What the Huff Post article fails to report is the second vote

Quote:
In a surprising result, Democrats and more than two dozen Republicans voted 78-20 to kill the $120 billion GOP alternative that would have simply extended the existing 2 percentage point payroll tax cut, financed by freezing federal workers' pay through 2015 and reducing the government bureaucracy.
Senate rejects payroll tax cut extension for now - CBS News

Could this actually signal compromise?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:35 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,950,438 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It was temporary. We'll just go back to what we had a mere 11 months ago.
Should be NBD.
You mean on average $1000 in our pocket. Sorry, I like the $1000 I had 11 months ago. Republicans are so quick to take from the middle class but dead set against taking anything from the people who can afford it the most. Lets see how quick they are to let the Bush tax cuts expire, which benefits the rich disproportionately.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:40 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,198,598 times
Reputation: 7693
^^^ Oh boy, more OWS rhetoric...

I guess it would be OK when obama raises taxes and takes your money another way...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:43 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,464,090 times
Reputation: 4586
We need permanent, not temporary, tax reductions. Anything so temporary isn't going to do much good for the economy. Perhaps these Republicans understand that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:44 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,950,438 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
What the Huff Post article fails to report is the second vote

Senate rejects payroll tax cut extension for now - CBS News

Could this actually signal compromise?
Good cite. The Democratic plan would have given on average 1500 back to working americans and the republican plan would have given 1000 back and they both differed on where the money to pay for it was going to come from.

Interestingly, almost half of the Republicans did not support the republican plan. There is some real division in the Republican party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:46 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,024,526 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
You mean on average $1000 in our pocket. Sorry, I like the $1000 I had 11 months ago. Republicans are so quick to take from the middle class but dead set against taking anything from the people who can afford it the most. Lets see how quick they are to let the Bush tax cuts expire, which benefits the rich disproportionately.
If the Bush tax cuts expire, all taxes will be raised, even those on the lowest income. So, while the argument is made that the rich benefit most from the tax cuts, wouldn't the converse be true? That the lowest incomes are impacted the most by the expiration of the Bush tax cuts? After all, they would be going from 10% to 15% and the new 10% group would be eliminated, with the lowest income tax bracket at 15%. Seems like, if the you didn't want to raise taxes on the poor and middle class, you would be in favor of the Bush Tax Cuts.

Here's a good summary of all the changes from Bush Tax Cuts.

Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:46 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,198,598 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Good cite. The Democratic plan would have given on average 1500 back to working americans and the republican plan would have given 1000 back and they both differed on where the money to pay for it was going to come from.

Interestingly, almost half of the Republicans did not support the republican plan. There is some real division in the Republican party.
Can't get to say the word compromise can you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2011, 09:48 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,950,438 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
If the Bush tax cuts expire, all taxes will be raised, even those on the lowest income. So, while the argument is made that the rich benefit most from the tax cuts, wouldn't the converse be true? That the lowest incomes are impacted the most by the expiration of the Bush tax cuts? After all, they would be going from 10% to 15% and the new 10% group would be eliminated, with the lowest income tax bracket at 15%. Seems like, if the you didn't want to raise taxes on the poor and middle class, you would be in favor of the Bush Tax Cuts.

Here's a good summary of all the changes from Bush Tax Cuts.

Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oh I am in favor of keeping the tax cuts for the poor and the middle class but not for the wealthy, but if they will not agree on that...let them all expire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top