Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Chromekitty is right about the Mexican trucks, per the agreement. Truckers on roads in places like Texas were rightly screaming bloody murder about it. They are not, nor is anyone as safe on our roads as they were before Mexico's trucks were let in.
WikiLeaks Exposes North American Integration Plot (http://thenewamerican.com/world-mainmenu-26/north-america-mainmenu-36/7336-wikileaks-exposes-north-american-integration-plot - broken link)
U.S. & Canada Agree to Common "Perimeter" (http://thenewamerican.com/index.php/world-mainmenu-26/north-america-mainmenu-36/6274-us-a-canada-agree-to-common-perimeter-biometric-tracking - broken link)
FTR, none of those are credible sources.
That said, they didn't address my question anyway. Who would it benefit, and how?
The North American Union (NAU) is a theoretical economic union
You can use the resources you were given and do your own research or not, makes no difference to me.(there is plenty out there if you don't like the "resources") But at the end of the day the union does in fact exist and instead of worrying who it benefits perhaps you might be better to worry who does it harm. Answer....we the people.
Think of the posters of whom you are requesting participate in critical thinking and discussion. Drive by hyperbole is more their style, not substance.
Thats your specialty, when you're not accusing someone of trolling because they disagree with you.
You have been hearing it for years because you sought out the loons that spew this non-sense and decided to believe it without even the basic work of confirming facts like a normal adult sentient human being would. If I heard some one spouting weird crap on street corners the least I would ask myself is if this is true (not from other people raving the same crap), not think they have the right idea. Especially crap sourcing from well known mentally ill ranters like Alex Jones and David Icke about the laughable tin foil hat classic Zeitgeist.
The better thing to do is not believe stupid crap instead of complaining when it is pointed out how foolish you have been to believe in it.
If you want to be taken as a serious adult then act like one, not a foolish gullible child that can't tell mentally deranged raving from reality.
We are so glad we have Libs from Portland who are world travelled and so openminded to straighten us out and tell us the truth
In response to the last repition I received, thank you, and yes, your right, I don't believe many people are aware of where we are headed...I've read about this in many books, when my son was small...heard many people talk about this, and I'm not about to dismiss Kennedy's last speech...he was trying to tell us something, which is what got him killed....he wanted to make changes...and those changes went against what others were striving for...
but it is coming very soon...the change I've seen in a lifetime is frightening to say the least...can't imagine what it's going to be like for our grand children...
Thanks for your consideration and believe me, I'm not brave, just don't care anymore what people think...I don't need to be popular to be successful...and the more people come into a thread like this and are unkind to it's posters, the more it makes me think, no wonder they were able to be successful with this...
Americans are stupid...well, a better word is naive....
No, stupid is indeed the correct word to describe most Americans these days.
I repped you for being able to think for yourself, like me, and see what is coming
what you gave me is garbage. AKA, lies. Bullsh*t. Nonsense. Non-factual claims.
No, it doesn't. It never has. Hence the word, "Theoretical."
One link you gave me , dated 2006, said it was a "Secret Policy of George W. Bush." Hah! If it's a secret, then how does the author know about it?
I did not ask you to take my word as gospel, as I stated....it is simply an avenue for you (others have posted information
for you as well) to begin your own research. What you are telling me is that you are doing nothing more than posting your opinion, which you are certainly entitled to but that does not make it correct.
Further, the article dated '06' how many years was babybush in office? And if you did your homework you would also find that this along with nafta was one of his father's babies. Willful ignorance.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Drive by hyperbole is more their style, not substance.
