Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:04 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,117,461 times
Reputation: 9409

Advertisements

Stupid firefighters. Yeah buddy...that's what we need! Thank you Liberalism for your AMAZING FORESIGHT!

The resentment will be palpable......and the ire towards these new-hires 100% deserved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:04 PM
 
3,498 posts, read 2,217,449 times
Reputation: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Sounds to me like the city should have chosen one qualifier and stuck with it.
If the 'real' score required for hiring was in the 80s, then that should have been the cut-off.
Can't change the rules in the middle of the game and expect to get away with it.
Why did the city change the qualifications during the hiring process?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Fairfax, VA
3,826 posts, read 3,386,868 times
Reputation: 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
I think it's ridiculous, race should not be a factor in qualifying you for a job.





So we lower the bar until enough black candidates qualify?

.... and how does lowering the bar make the white applicants more stupid? They will still be the best candidates for the job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:05 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,032,070 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
Sounds to me like the city should have chosen one qualifier and stuck with it.
If the 'real' score required for hiring was in the 80s, then that should have been the cut-off.
Can't change the rules in the middle of the game and expect to get away with it.
They shouldn't have a qualifying score at all and just picked the highest scores, end of story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,695,649 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Puppy View Post
Why did the city change the qualifications during the hiring process?
That, I would imagine, is the $64,000 question and most likely the basis for the decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:07 PM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,974,480 times
Reputation: 4555
The argument is these black candidates make the "qualification" thresehold to do the job. Therefore, hiring should be proportional to the percentage of blacks in the community. Nobody hiring here, is claiming the potential job candidates are ranked in order. The candidates that were not hired are making the claim due to their aptitude scores and/or job qualifications making them "more qualified". I don't disagree with their argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:09 PM
 
3,498 posts, read 2,217,449 times
Reputation: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
They shouldn't have a qualifying score at all and just picked the highest scores, end of story.
The standard practice of the city seems to be random selection if they meet the qualifications. The current crop of firefighters were selected thsi way, including the White ones. You don't seem to have a problem with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:10 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,992,148 times
Reputation: 7060
Ditto to the 'quotas doesn't work' theme, and diversity for diversity sake should never take precedence over a person's abilities and qualifications. People's lives are at stake, here. Fighting fires is not the time to be politically correct.

Asian firefighters see no racism in the FDNY
Pols believe lack of participation is a cultural issue.
Brett Munsey, 43, who is of Filipino descent has been with the department for five years and said he greatly enjoys his job and at no time during the testing process or his time in uniform did he ever experience racism by the FDNY or his fellow firefighters. He even has a co-worker that is of Korean decent.

"From my perspective, there is no bias toward any ethnic group," Munsey said. "It's open to everyone and anyone who is eligible."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:10 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,032,070 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsRock View Post
.... and how does lowering the bar make the white applicants more stupid? They will still be the best candidates for the job.
I'm not sure what you mean? The people to get the job were randomly selected from those applicants that scored above 89. Apparently many black applicants did not score above 89 so you had disproportionate amount of black applicants that did not qualify. The only way to get them to qualify is to lower the score needed to qualify.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2012, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,475,534 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Puppy View Post
Why did the city change the qualifications during the hiring process?
they Did NOT 'change' the hiring in the middle

like ANY firm (to include the federal governmet) you have LEVELS of applicants:

not qualified
qualified
and HIGHLY qualified

they stated at it STILL GOES that 65 was qualified...they HIRED the HIGHLY qualifed of 89 and up




its in the op(NYT) story

The city said anyone who had scored above 65 was considered “qualified,” but chose its initial hires from random sets among candidates who scored 89 or better, a group it deemed “highly qualified,” court documents say.



if I have a guy scoring 90 and is highly qualified...should I HIRE the guy who made a 65 instead????? just for the sake of a quota???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top