Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:00 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,320,782 times
Reputation: 2136

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by quigboto View Post
When the sole purpose of that simple sonogram procedure is to be an intervention/confrontation tactic to shame and humiliate women, then yes, indeed they should "whine" about it.
That is only your opinion. It's not about shaming or humilating women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:02 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,320,782 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucidkitty View Post
negative they do not
I already posted a link in here that says they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Humboldt Park, Chicago
3,501 posts, read 3,136,713 times
Reputation: 2597
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
That is only your opinion. It's not about shaming or humilating women.
I respectfully disagree. If that was the case, the arguments for it would be of a medical nature. As it is, most of the arguments for it are the morally passive aggressive "She's already getting an abortion, so she shouldn't mind one little procedure." or "Why shouldn't she have to see the baby before she kills it?" or "What's the big deal? It's no worse than a pap smear!"
The merits of it are being argued on moral grounds, not medical necessity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:05 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,320,782 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
This is key: We actually ARE "free to take another life". We just are. It's the law and had been for quite awhile. Now, operating within the law and exercising that freedom makes it VERY reasonable for people to WHINE about a not so simple sonogram procedure or anything else that politicians decide to throw out there just to make themselves look good and get votes but has nothing to do with actual health care.

You should be whining as well since it's setting a precedent that may bite you in the butt one day. Don't like what someone is doing because "your tax money" is going to a cause in some convoluted, round about way? Make laws that force unnecessary medical or other procedures or processes on you just for discouragement purposes....imagine it.
I ain't buying the excuse by the pro-choicers that this ultrasound is about spending money. Many in here have already admitted the real reason. If one is so confident in their decision to have an abortion nothing will sway them otherwise. If it does, then they had some doubt to begin with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:07 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,320,782 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucidkitty View Post
Except a pap smear is not required by law
So what? If it was, would you object to it? I wouldn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:08 PM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,153,076 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
That is only your opinion. It's not about shaming or humilating women.
What don't you get about FORCING a medical procedure on someone?


Why do you think medical procedures should be FORCED on someone?


Would YOU want a medical procedure FORCED on you whether it was needed or not?



Contrary to what YOU think, a patient has the final say in what is done to them, NOT the doctor and NOT the government.



I know you won't answer any of those questions but do you like MY idea of controlling women's reproduction?

""""I think they should pass a law that forces all women who want to have a baby spend two years supporting 5 foster children , on their own, .....to see if it's really what they want to do.""""
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:12 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,320,782 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeafChick View Post
If a women doesn't want to, she will find another way to terminate her pregnancy and that usually involved unsafe procedures.

Have you forgotten about the illegal medical clinic that prompt this law in the first place?
Then she would only have herself to blame if she went to some quack of a doctor and had it done anyway and she would be breaking the law also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Humboldt Park, Chicago
3,501 posts, read 3,136,713 times
Reputation: 2597
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
I ain't buying the excuse by the pro-choicers that this ultrasound is about spending money. Many in here have already admitted the real reason. If one is so confident in their decision to have an abortion nothing will sway them otherwise. If it does, then they had some doubt to begin with.
So now you admit that the sole purpose of the procedure is to shame and humiliate women into changing their minds about their choice to abort (and to punish them if they don't)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,791,864 times
Reputation: 24863
These laws are about male control of women and their reproduction system. It is a step in forcing women back into home and under control of their fathers, brothers and husbands. Another factor is mediocre men are tired of competing with excellent women for the good jobs. They do not want to lose Mommy and have to compete with Sister.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Humboldt Park, Chicago
3,501 posts, read 3,136,713 times
Reputation: 2597
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
I ain't buying the excuse by the pro-choicers that this ultrasound is about spending money. Many in here have already admitted the real reason. If one is so confident in their decision to have an abortion nothing will sway them otherwise. If it does, then they had some doubt to begin with.
The crux of the argument of the pro-choice side has nothing to do with spending money, and everything to do with an unnecessary procedure being forced upon women seeking their legally entitled access to an abortion. It's about pro-lifers trying to obstruct, shame, and humiliate because they see themselves as self-appointed morality police, and nothing more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top