Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,827,269 times
Reputation: 12341

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Nope, just pointing out that you like obama care....and now want to opt out and not pay....which you will still do in obama care.
I won't call it Obama Care, largely because of republicanism embedded in it. I would, and prefer it, if it included at least public option.

So, why are you opposed to implementing this republican redprint for Medicare/Medicaid deform within five years and a provision to opt out if bureaucrats must dictate my "premium" based on inflation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:23 AM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,411,323 times
Reputation: 6388
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Still refuses to offer any revenue increase, only cuts. There is no similarity to Simpson-Bowles. He again would assure the demise of Medicare. Nothing new, oh except now they call the "Death Panels", unelected bureaucrats. I guess so they can confuse their minions...apparently it works .. ^^
Bob, just stop it. Paul Ryan on CNBC this morning made it as clear as a bell that under the proposed budget MORE revenues would be collected from the income tax BEFORE any dynamic scoring. Simpson Bowles and the Gang of Six and Rivlin's commission ALL called for taking the garbage out of the tax code, reducing deductions and exemption and loopholes, cutting the marginal rates, AND COLLECTING MORE ACTUAL DOLLARS. This is the Ryan formula as well.

SOme people are so fixated on jamming a high marginal rate down the country's throat that they are not paying attention to the arithmetic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,874 posts, read 26,521,399 times
Reputation: 25774
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
I don't actually see this as a mistake, unless you take honesty as a mistake.

Many Republicans, many on this board in fact, can not settle on the fact that Americans like social security and medicare.

Ryans plan would cut both, and allow opt outs, etc. Its a good starting point for a compromise. But this is generally the Republican motto. Allow private investment outside of social security, if not end it. Allow for private options of medicare, if you can find any. And increase military spending. All the while, hardly, if ever, raise taxes.

Democrats just spend and spend and spend, without raising taxes, and without cutting programs.

There are realistic cuts and changes to the medicare and social security programs. We should cut defense, instead of increase it, and taxes are simply going to have to be raised, probably on everyone, to pay down our national debt.

Thats the hard truth, and Ryan's plan lays out some hard truths. But where its politically a problem is that they seem to think that if they keep telling people that privatizing social security and medicare are good options, and the real truth is 70% of Americans support those programs EXACTLY the way they appear today.

I'm not saying that we should leave well enough alone, because they are hardly well enough, but the cuts and changes he proposes simply are supported by Americans.

I agree with your comments. The concern is with what you indicate...that many people support these plans as they are today. But the plans we have today are not economically viable. To keep the same benefits, SS and Medicare taxes would have to be increased rather dramatically. Yet, due to policital expediency we have CUT those taxes for the last two years. I hope most people are smart enough to realize that this can't continue, and that "sticking it to the rich" won't solve our problems.

Equally as big an issue is Medicaid, something no one wants to talk about. Both federal and state expenditures have increased excessively over the past decade, and we aren't even willing to look at ways of reigning in spending.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by marcopolo View Post
Bob, just stop it. Paul Ryan on CNBC this morning made it as clear as a bell that under the proposed budget MORE revenues would be collected from the income tax BEFORE any dynamic scoring. Simpson Bowles and the Gang of Six and Rivlin's commission ALL called for taking the garbage out of the tax code, reducing deductions and exemption and loopholes, cutting the marginal rates, AND COLLECTING MORE ACTUAL DOLLARS. This is the Ryan formula as well.

SOme people are so fixated on jamming a high marginal rate down the country's throat that they are not paying attention to the arithmetic.
Please .... "A pig by any other name, is still a pig".

Paul Ryan’s budget: Should the poor pay for deficit reduction? - The Washington Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:33 AM
 
4,734 posts, read 4,332,501 times
Reputation: 3235
I love it. Keep 'em coming. The republicans are just showing themselves to be the house of loons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,861,032 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by chickenfriedbananas View Post
I love it. Keep 'em coming. The republicans are just showing themselves to be the house of loons.
I know. For those who haven't read this years version, don't worry, just look up last years. It's the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:43 AM
 
46,302 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11133
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
I won't call it Obama Care, largely because of republicanism embedded in it. I would, and prefer it, if it included at least public option.

So, why are you opposed to implementing this republican redprint for Medicare/Medicaid deform within five years and a provision to opt out if bureaucrats must dictate my "premium" based on inflation?
I'm not saying yes or no...either way.....

All I'm saying is that 1 bill you like and the other you don't.....one you don't want to opt out and the other you do.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:47 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,827,269 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
I'm not saying yes or no...either way.....

All I'm saying is that 1 bill you like and the other you don't.....one you don't want to opt out and the other you do.....
And you're different, I assume? Really? That you like both or neither?

Personally, I don't see how Affordable Care Act affects me adversely. As I said, it is far from being perfect, and the least we should have gotten is a public option. As for this Paul Ryan idiocy (that you likely "like", but you don't like ACA), my questioning starts with... why start 10 years down the road? Too much of a voting bloc to deal with, if we were to start 3-5 years down the road instead?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,218,912 times
Reputation: 8537
Mr. Ryan's answer's to questions were loaded with spin and non-answers. He has defered to committee the loop holes which he wouldnt comment on. Give me a break at least the Pres. has put out a starting budget, it may not pass but it gives you 2 different views. I think the Repub. budget will pass the house but not the senate.
It is Repub. economic polices that didnt work and that are still hurting our country and creating the debt that is being created now.
I want to see what happens when the Bush taxes end and the cost saving occurs in 2013
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2012, 09:51 AM
 
8,631 posts, read 9,141,307 times
Reputation: 5990
What is Ryan's tax plan for American companies who've moved their operations overseas?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top