Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-23-2012, 03:55 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,940,850 times
Reputation: 3416

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSparkle928 View Post
What makes you think the remaining US would have to ask for your oil? Same thing we should have done with Canada. Much easier to just take it, with or without your permission. (Though it would be much easier on the TX population if they just surrender it.
When you find out what a refinery actually does, and you still don't understand , Oh nevermind.. enjoy your rant..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-23-2012, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,768,347 times
Reputation: 5691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
I thought this thread was about Texans betraying the United States?
Nah, they are not treasonous and wishing for demise of the USA, just an amicable split. It is all a thought experiment.

So many of the right wing threads here talk about a world where Rush Limbaugh could write the Constitution, everyone would pull their weight, and no gays would kiss in public. Such a libertarian world has never existed anywhere, so a free Texas is as close as we will ever get to that Conservatopia dream, IMO. So, this thread is about what they would do, and how would we respond. Let's assume another Civil War is not an option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2012, 04:23 PM
 
Location: West Egg
2,160 posts, read 1,956,413 times
Reputation: 1297
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
Yes, it would be interesting given that 3 refineries were just shut down on the east coast and the majority of the remaining refineries are in Texas.. When you're right, you're right... It would be interesting.
This is so completely wrong ...

First off, only one refinery has been shut down -- the Conoco Phillipps in Philadelphia, which is now on the market. CP believes it can sell it (to someone, obviously, who will start it up again). Sunoco will shut down its Marcus Hook refinery in June, while Hovensa announced in January that it will shut its Virgin Islands refinery.

Now, those three jurisdictions -- PA, NJ and VI -- produce a total of 1.8m bpd; that's 10% of the U.S. total, and includes all refineries in those jurisdictions, not just the ones closing.

Texas refines 4.7m bpd, or 26% of the U.S. total. So the total U.S. refining capacity outside of those states/territories where some (but not all) of the refineries have been shut down and outside of Texas totals over 11m bpd, well over twice the capacity of Texas.

Fortunately, these numbers are public so people can verify whether claims made here are true or not:
U.S. Number and Capacity of Petroleum Refineries

Of course, those refineries only operate in order to sell product. If borders changed, the sales would continue. Refusing to sell product isn't much of a business model, after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2012, 04:23 PM
 
4,042 posts, read 3,531,260 times
Reputation: 1968
Yeah, and let's do our best to assure that there is no sequel to the Alamo, either. That illegal immigration problem is more than outta hand.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2012, 04:27 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,940,850 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Onions View Post
This is so completely wrong ...

First off, only one refinery has been shut down -- the Conoco Phillipps in Philadelphia, which is now on the market. CP believes it can sell it (to someone, obviously, who will start it up again). Sunoco will shut down its Marcus Hook refinery in June, while Hovensa announced in January that it will shut its Virgin Islands refinery.

Now, those three jurisdictions -- PA, NJ and VI -- produce a total of 1.8m bpd; that's 10% of the U.S. total, and includes all refineries in those jurisdictions, not just the ones closing.

Texas refines 4.7m bpd, or 26% of the U.S. total. So the total U.S. refining capacity outside of those states/territories where some (but not all) of the refineries have been shut down and outside of Texas totals over 11m bpd, well over twice the capacity of Texas.

Fortunately, these numbers are public so people can verify whether claims made here are true or not:
U.S. Number and Capacity of Petroleum Refineries

Of course, those refineries only operate in order to sell product. If borders changed, the sales would continue. Refusing to sell product isn't much of a business model, after all.
You're right on the numbers, but think about the end result. I'm not argueing your numbers.......Then there comes the question of what the rest of the states with other refineries would do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2012, 07:40 AM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,087,778 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post
You'd need a passport to fly through Texas. Plus don't forget tarriffs, etc. For the borders.
And we could charge them for use of the Colorado River. Wait, what? Ah, it originates in Colorado.
All your "water rights", etc. would have to be rescinded and reworked out again. Interesting.

They also would have to face shipping out of a Coast and fishing out on a coast that was not part of them. Those are US waters.. not Texas waters. US coast guard would not give one crap about ya, heh. Neither would the military.
Plus,the Border Patrol would leave and when Mexico "officially" invaded them (instead of just sneaking in a couple thousand a night )the US military wouldn't care...Texas would be the new base for the Mexican drug war and the Cartels would divide it all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2012, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Texas
5,872 posts, read 8,098,605 times
Reputation: 2971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunnysee View Post
Yeah, and let's do our best to assure that there is no sequel to the Alamo, either. That illegal immigration problem is more than outta hand.

Agreed. That Alamo problem w/ the traitorous squatters in the Alamo is what sparked it all along.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2012, 07:53 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
I don't think there is anyone here that realizes Texas was a Nation before it was a State. The Texas Constitution has remained the same and keeps the right to once again become a nation. It still calls Texas, the Republic of Texas, not the State of Texas.

Not in the boundaries set today, that define Texas. The boundaries that included Oklahoma and part of what is now Colorado.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2012, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Democratic Peoples Republic of Redneckistan
11,078 posts, read 15,087,778 times
Reputation: 3937
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
I don't think there is anyone here that realizes Texas was a Nation before it was a State. The Texas Constitution has remained the same and keeps the right to once again become a nation. It still calls Texas, the Republic of Texas, not the State of Texas.

Not in the boundaries set today, that define Texas. The boundaries that included Oklahoma and part of what is now Colorado.
Everyone is aware of that BB...today is a different day by a few years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2012, 08:24 AM
 
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas
933 posts, read 1,534,372 times
Reputation: 1179
If Texas were to secede, I'd proudly relocate to the United States. I'm an American and intend to stay one.

If Texas seceded, it would be a single-party state controlled by the Texas Republican Party and they would feel free to do whatever they pleased without any checks or balances (Texas Supreme Court is partisan). That thought alone terrifies me. It would turn into a Theocracy fast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top